Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for November, 2009

Obama’s First Year: an Appraisal

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

A year ago, I wrote a post for Comment is Free expressing my hopes and dreams for an Obama presidency.  Most of my comments revolved around the then upcoming Israeli elections.  The editors asked the same authors to follow up a year later with an appraisal of Obama’s first year in office.  What follows are excerpts of my post from a year ago followed by my one-year appraisal published a few days ago:

…Though Obama campaigned as somewhat of a hardliner on issues like Iran and Jerusalem to ensure support from the Jewish community, I do not believe he will govern or implement policy as a hawk. Nor will he be the anti-Israel pushover imagined by McCain and Jewish Republicans. He will not govern from ideology or even primarily from a sense of altruism. He will be a hard-headed realist trying to hold fast to a set of overarching principles.

…If Netanyahu, the leader of the Likud opposition and until recently the frontrunner in the polls, wins, then it will be a cold day in hell before peace agreements are signed with either the Syrians or Palestinians. In addition, we can expect continuing bellicosity toward Iran (and vice-versa). Certainly an Israeli attack against Iran is in the cards, along with escalating violence toward the Palestinians. One should expect Hamas to forgo its six-month-long truce and return to Qassam and terror attacks.

No matter how deft Obama’s policy is, I don’t see any way he can make progress with the rejectionist Likud in power. No one should make any mistake that Netanyahu is capable to doing a Sharon and becoming a pragmatic moderate when faced with governing (as opposed to campaigning, which always brings out the worst in Israeli politicians). Netanyahu is no Sharon. He is an opportunist and ideologue at the same time, but he is not pragmatic in the way that Sharon was.

♦  ♦  ♦

Obama Israeli-Arab Scorecard: A for Vision, C for Execution

Barack Obama earns a grade of A for vision and C for execution on his performance in his first year in office regarding the Israeli-Arab conflict.  He earns top marks for vision based largely on his magnificent Cairo speech, which was easily the most remarkable public statement any U.S. president has ever made on the subject.  But he earns a C for execution because hardly anything voiced in that speech has been translated into concrete accomplishment.

The major element of Obama administration efforts over the past few months has been a settlement freeze, which Israel’s Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu has successfully resisted.  The U.S. also made the foolhardy decision to lean on PA leader Mahmoud Abbas to scuttle the Goldstone Report on the Gaza war, for which Abbas took a drubbing in the Palestinian street.

It is beginning to dawn on U.S. policymakers that they may have to jettison the settlement freeze and move directly to final status negotiations.  But neither side seems willing to do so.

Israeli leaders are expert in the art of obfuscation and delay—which has been a hallmark of Israeli policy since 1967 (not that the Palestinians don’t deserve their share of blame as well).  The current Israeli government is both unwilling and unable to provide any positive leadership toward that end.  It seems interested in maintaining the status quo at all costs.

Reluctantly, tough love seems the only answer.  The path to an agreement will be massive, coordinated pressure on both sides by the U.S. and its European allies (including Russia).  This could involve withholding U.S. economic and military aid to Israel and other forms of temporary sanctions.  It could involve a peace agreement imposed on both sides and enforced by international peacekeepers.  The reason why such a solution could work is that both sides essentially know the outlines of a final agreement, which has been formulated both in the Clinton talks and the Geneva Accord.  Despite knowing, neither side seems able to get to Yes, which may be why the international community has to intercede.

Such an eventuality will make Israel’s supporters howl in protest and, as a supporter of Israel, I don’t relish the prospect either.  But nothing has worked thus far, neither moral suasion nor step-by-step negotiation.  If I believed Israel had a possible political alternative in the form of a more liberal governing coalition that could come to power and move the process forward, I might say hold off.  But given that Ehud Olmert’s last government was a centrist coalition that made no progress on these matters, I can’t say that waiting for Tzipi Livni to take the reins at some future date will lead to better results.

That is why if Barack Obama really wants a peace agreement he will have to be much tougher than he has till now.  Instead of the visionary Obama, we need Obama the doer.  Results are far more critical than glowing words.

What Do You Get When You Cross Vidal Sassoon With Global Jihad?

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Sassoon: looking for anti-Semites in all the wrong places

Sassoon: looking for anti-Semites in all the wrong places

Some very bad scholarship.  If only Vidal Sassoon had stuck to hair styling and not attempted to burnish his reputation by creating an academic program in his name…Then we would not have to suffer the utter narischkeit of passages like this, penned by Robert Wistrich, director of The Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism at the Hebrew University:

Today, shocking to relate, the specter of such apocalyptic anti-Semitism has returned to haunt Europe and other continents, while often assuming radically new forms.

In the Middle East, it has taken on a particularly dangerous, toxic and potentially genocidal aura of hatred, closely linked to the “mission” of holy war or jihad against the West and the Jews.

Islamist anti-Semitism is thoroughly soaked in many of the most inflammatory themes that initially made possible the atrocities of Crystal Night and its horrific aftermath during the Holocaust.

For example, the pervasive use of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion with its perennial theme of the “Jewish conspiracy for world domination;” or the medieval blood-libel imported to the Muslim world from Christian Europe; or the vile stereotypical image of the Jews as a treacherous, rapacious, and bloodthirsty people engaged in a ceaseless plotting to undermine the world of Islam.

To these grotesque inventions one must add the…slanderous identification of Israel with Nazism or the “ethnic cleansing” of the Palestinians. This modernized version of inverted anti-Semitism which sails under the mask of “anti-Zionism” and anti-Americanism, is today a global phenomenon, but it has special resonance in the Middle East as a result of the unresolved “Palestinian question.”

The scale and extremism of the literature and commentary available in Arab or Muslim newspapers, journals, magazines, caricatures, on Islamist websites, on the Middle Eastern radio and TV news, in documentaries, films, and educational materials, is comparable only to that of Nazi Germany at its worst.

Yet the Western world largely turns a blind eye to the likely genocidal consequences of such a culture of hatred, much as it did 70 years ago. My own extensive research into this phenomenon has, unfortunately, convinced me that the Holocaust did not truly succeed in neutralizing the scourge of anti-Semitism.

In a sinister and sometimes devious manner, the widespread defamation and demonization of Israel has in effect revived fantasies of completing the murderous work of the Third Reich. This is especially palpable in the case of Iran. Hence, the anniversary of Crystal Night raises two fundamental moral questions for the future of human civilization. Are we at all capable of learning from history, and will the Jewish people once again have to stand alone in the face of concrete threats to annihilate it? On the answer to these questions much may depend.

Ah, the sky is falling, Chicken Wistrich calls to all his Jewish brethren.  One gets the impression that Iran specifically, and radical Islam in general, provides excellent fodder for the Abe Foxmans and Robert Wistriches of the world, who use it to stoke the fears and open the purses of the world’s guilty and wealthy Jews.

I have a sneaking suspicion that Vidal Sassoon was better at his chosen profession than Prof. Wistrich is at his.

Who’s Defending Jack Teitel?

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Jack Teitel’s legal defense team presents some interesting characters from the extreme settler movement.  According to the Rosh Pina Project (full disclosure: this is a site affiliated with Messianic Jews), Teitel is being represented by Ami Kedar, who is linked to Honenu.  This group encourages IDF soldiers to defy military orders in enforcing discipline against settlers, including during the Gaza evacuation.  It defends IDF soldiers accused or convicted of crimes against Palestinian civilians.  It also raises funds for wonderful specimens of humanity like Rabin assassin, Yigal Amir:

Who or what is Honenu?

It is an Israeli legal group which campaigns for the release of Jewish murderers from Israeli jails when Arab murderers are released. They are headed up by Shmuel Meidad, known in right-wing circles as ‘Zangi.’ Meidad has previously spent time in prison, as has Ariel Groner, responsible for handling prisoner affairs in Honenu, who was arrested in 2006 and spent three months under house arrest. Groner was recently arrested after he was noticed handing out leaflets inciting violence against homosexuals, as was Teitel.

A Haaretz reporter quotes this justification for the mindset of Jewish terrorists:

As far as Hanenu is concerned, it [Jewish terror] derives from “mistaken judgment against a background of compromised security, or personal factors related to judgment and the sense that one needs to exact revenge.”

Honenu had the chutzpah to attempt to piggyback onto the Gilad Shalit negotiation, demanding that if Palestinian militants were freed by Israel that Jewish terrorists should be as well.  I kid you not.  There should be a special place in hell reserved for chutzpaniks like this.  For someone not involved in the day to day politics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and even for the average Israeli such outrageousness appears to be little more than that: strange behavior from a ragtag group of far-right extremists.  People don’t understand the real implications of these views and the danger they pose for the greater society.

The Teitel family was also defended by Nadia Matar of Women in Green.  Interestingly, Phil Weiss offered a recording of Matar speaking at a New York synagogue during a fundraising event, during which she advocated assassinating Mahmoud Abbas.

These are not harmless, slightly aberrant individuals playing out their delusions on a small stage.  These are individuals planting the seeds of destruction of the secular Israel state.  They can’t achieve their aims alone.  But taken together with the internal divisions and contradictions within Israeli society itself, these people pose a real and present danger to the State.  They have never been confronted with the full force of state authority.  Hell, the State often aids, abets and encourages them.  That’s the reason why Teitel could run rampant for 12 years without detection.

For more on the nexus between Judean settlers extremists and American Jewish tax-exempt groups like the Moskowitz Foundation, read Max Blumenthal’s eye-opening post.  The U.S. tax-exempt Central Fund for Israel has made contributions to Honenu (page 18), meaning that your tax dollars and mine are indirectly subsidizing a group that defends Jewish terror.

Congress Denounces Goldstone, Baird Courageously Dissents

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

In what universe is the U.S. House of Representatives?  The rest of the world and American citizens look at Operation Cast Lead and see massacre (a Rasmussen poll during the war found 55% of Americans opposed it and only 33% supported it).  Congress sees only the green of pro-Israel campaign contributions and dutifully calls the sun the moon for all the world to see.  That’s why HR 867, which denounces the Goldstone Report, passed today despite the opposition of pro-Israel groups like Peace Now and human rights groups like Human Rights Watch.

Every Israeli human rights NGO denounced the Gaza war and supports the Goldstone Report.  Yet, the U.S. Congress, whose members haven’t bothered to read the Report, arrogate to themselves the right to claim superior knowledge on the issue:

…Lawmakers approved a non-binding resolution that calls the report “irredeemably biased and unworthy of further consideration or legitimacy.”

The symbolic measure also urges President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “to strongly and unequivocally oppose” any discussion of the report or action on its findings in any international setting.

“I think the UN report is unbalanced, and unfair, and inaccurate,” said Democratic House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer.

“It’s unfortunate that the United Nations deals with Israel, in my opinion, in a totally biased and unbalanced way. And it is the only country in the world, Israel, that has a special focus by the United Nations,” he added.

There is one silver lining: 36 courageous lawmakers lined up against this smear (22 others voted “present” a milder form of protest).  That makes 58 politicians willing to buck the wrath of the Israel lobby.  Sol Salbe has also noted that there were 133 members who did not vote at all, which is an even milder form of opposition (but it’s still opposition).  And who knows, if J Street’s position had been stronger, there might’ve been a few other votes in the right column.  But I join Phil Weiss is praising these Congressmembers.  They deserve our gratitude.  Among them are:

Earl Blumenauer
Jim McDermott (my House member)
Brian Baird (another Seattle-area member)
Lois Capps
Betty McCollum
Keith Ellison
Charles Boustany
Pete Stark
George Miller
John Dingell
Dennis Kucinich
Bob Filner (who spoke at the J Street conference)
Lynn Woolsey

As I read the list, only one Jewish member opposed HR 867, Bob Filner. Even more kudos to him.

Brian Baird said this in opposition to the Resolution:

“I have been to Gaza and I have read in its entirety the Goldstone report and I will tell you he says many things, that though unpleasant, are true, and must not be obstructed,” countered Democratic Representative Brian Baird.

Baird bolstered his speech against the resolution with photographs of dead Palestinian children and Israeli children seeking shelter during a suspected Palestinian rocket attack.

How many other House members have bothered to go to Gaza? You could count them on the fingers of one hand. How many actually read Goldstone? Probably only Baird.

I read passages of HR 867 and it is utter garbage.  It could’ve been written by an Israeli foreign ministry lawyer (and probably was).  It mistates facts and gets virtually everything it says about the Report wrong.  It regurgitates Israeli propaganda against Goldstone.  It makes no attempt to be in the least fair or balanced.  Which is a less than can be said for Goldstone, which bent over backwards to incorporate the Israeli narrative when it could (considering Israel refused to cooperate this was made difficult).

This is Congress at its worst. This is why U.S. policy toward the Israeli-Arab conflict has been so abysmal for so long.

The Goldstone Report seeks to end Israeli impunity.  It seeks to bring international law to bear on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  It seeks to place limits and constraints on Israeli behavior during war.  This is a struggle on which the IDF, the Israel lobby, and U.S. Congress are on the losing side of history.  This is not Congress’ finest hour.

Lou Dobbs Leaves CNN for Cartoon Network

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

From the pen of Andy Borowitz:

NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report) – Controversial TV host Lou Dobbs announced today that he was leaving CNN and would soon be joining the primetime lineup of The Cartoon Network.

Mr. Dobbs will be joining a schedule that includes such programs as Tom and Jerry and What’s New, Scooby-Doo?
While a press release from The Cartoon Network called Mr. Dobbs’ show “a perfect fit,” Davis Logsdon, the chairman of the media studies department at the University of Minnesota, took a dimmer view.

“I think the addition of Lou Dobbs will be a tremendous blow to The Cartoon Network’s credibility,” he said.
In other broadcast news, on Sunday the Fox News Channel reported that an American won the New York marathon and a Kenyan won the U.S. presidency.

Earlier on Sunday, Fox marked Daylight Savings Time by setting its clocks back 400 years.

If at First You Don’t Succeed, Try, Try Haq Again

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

The Seattle district attorney tried Naveed Haq, accused Seattle federation attacker once and the trial ended in a mistrial.  Despite the fact that Haq has a long history of mental illness along with mental health professionals who testified in the first trial to the fact that his illness destroyed his ability to apprehend reality, the county prosecutor is trying again.  I fear that he is doing so because this has become a political, as much as a legal trial.  He doesn’t want to be perceived by the local Jewish community as being soft of Muslim extremism (even though Haq was so disturbed that he at one time renounced his religion and became a Christian).  The organized community leadership is leading the charge, in my opinion, in calling for judgment against Haq.  They were not satisfied with the mistrial and they’ve pressured the King County prosecutor for a second attempt.

The prosecutor betrays the willful confusion of its case:

Senior deputy prosecutor Don Raz argued that although Haq clearly suffers from mental illness, his actions cannot be attributed to his disorder. Rather, the shootings were a deliberate choice made out of anger, not delusion.

“Naveed Haq’s mental illness did not cause him to attack the Jewish Federation,” Raz said. “His anger did.”

Anyone with even a limited understanding of mental illness understands that irrational rage or anger is one of the most common symptoms of mental illness especially mental illness that manifests itself in violent acts.  Unless you want to argue that Haq is a Muslim extremist programmed to kill Jews, it is clear his mental illness led him to the attack.

If you polled most of the victims of this tragedy or the individual members of our community I have little doubt that most would say: plea bargain this out and get him locked away in a mental health facility and stop treating him like he’s Al Qaeda.  Haq should be treated as any mentally disturbed violent individual would be.  He should be monitored closely and incarcerated as a dangerous person.  But this retrial is a betrayal of our understanding of mental illness and doesn’t characterize the liberal attitude prevalent in our community on such issues..

Who Supports Jack Teitel? ‘After All, It’s You and Me’

Monday, November 2nd, 2009
Alleged settler killer Jack Teitels arsenal (Walla)

Alleged settler killer Jack Teitel's arsenal (Walla)

For those of you of an age you’ll remember the classic Rolling Stones song, Sympathy for the Devil:

Who killed the Kennedys?  After all it was you and me.

I’d like to rephrase the lyric: who made Jack Teitel the vicious killer he is?  After all, it was you and me in the sense that he was the product of an ultra-Orthodox upbringing in Florida.  He made a home in a West Bank settlement, Shvut Rachel, that was also the home of yet another Jewish terrorist, Asher Weissgan, convicted of massacreing five Palestinian laborers in a 2005 terror incident.

You’ll hear countless choruses of “not me” from the settler movement.  I wasn’t responsible for him.  He was a lone gunman.  He was mentally imbalanced.  He kept to himself and never told anyone what he thought.  His own brother in law claims he never even had a meal in his home.  We’re not responsible.  Not me.

That won’t work.  There is a cancer in the midst of this movement.  I don’t expect the settlers themselves to uproot this cancer.  But Israel should be expected to take a stronger role in combatting the illness.  And if Israel won’t, then the U.S. government should in ways I’ve already outlined here.

Kudos to the Israeli news site, Walla, for breaking the gag order on this case and publishing news of it.  The Shin Bet, for their trouble, hauled in Walla staff for questioning since usually the Israeli press is compliant with such military censorship.  I’m glad in this case someone refused to drink the Kool Aid, otherwise the Shin Bet could’ve kept this case under wraps forever.

Jack Teitel in custody (European Pressphoto)

Jack Teitel in custody (European Pressphoto)

The Israeli judicial system also deserves black marks for refusing Teitel legal representation for two weeks at the behest of the Israeli attorney general.  No matter this guy’s alleged guilt, in a democracy you provide even the worst criminal a lawyer.  I would agree with Teitel’s settler supports on this point.

Here you see part of Teitel’s arsenal (unfortunately, they’ve omitted the bomb-making materials at which Teitel had become proficient in two previous bombings).  Who provided this to him?  Even if he bought this himself, could we not expect the Shin Bet to monitor such an arsenal and the person amassing it?

And finally, you and I made the Jack Teitels of the radical settler movement in that the U.S. government continues to bestow tax deductions on tens of millions of donations from U.S. Jews to settlements like Shvut Rachel and countless others which are used to amass arsenals like the one he had along with other military equipment used to harrass, intimidate and even kill Palestinian civilians in the Territories.

Such inaction on the part of the IRS and federal government at ending this indirect subsidy of terror is shameful and should be ended posthaste.

StandWithUs: On the Side of the [Financial] Angels

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Eli Clifton has written a terrific piece of investigative journalism uncovering the financial sugar daddies and mommies of StandWithUs, the pro-Israel “truth squad.”  He notes the irony that SWU and others like Lenny Ben David, the former political enforcer for Aipac, have called J Street to task for accepting funding from Arabs, while SWU itself accepts funding from wealthy American Jews who support the worst forms of racist attack on Muslims:

…An IPS investigation into the tax records of the donors to StandWithUs, which professes to be ideologically neutral, found a web of funders who support organizations that have been accused of anti-Muslim propaganda and encouraging a militant Israeli and U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.Some of these organizations have tied the origins of Palestinian nationalism to Nazi ideology, and suggested that a vast Muslim conspiracy — in a similar vein to the anti-Semitic Protocols of the Elders of Zion — is mobilizing to undermine the U.S. constitution and impose Sharia law.

SWU’s annual budget is around $3.4 million.

Among such donors are Susan Wexner, heiress to the Wexner family clothing empire, who contributed $850,000 between 2005-2008:

Wexner also made contributions to the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), and the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD).

…Critics say [MEMRI] is a propaganda outlet, and accuse it of mistranslation and overstating the prevalence of anti-Semitism in Middle East media.

Independently, I have verified that Wexner contributed $600,000 to an Israeli group aiding the settlers of Gush Katif, many of refuse to resettle permanently in protest of their forced evacuation from Gaza.  She’s also one of those who believes there’s no left or right when it comes to Israel, but that there is only one morally correct position–being pro-Israel.

Returning to MEMRI, Roz Rothstein’s defense is touching, if self-serving and inaccurate:

“MEMRI is used by every news publication on the planet. People don’t look at MEMRI as right-wing. It’s just verbatim Arabic translation. They’ve never been cited for inaccurate translation.”

In 2007, CNN correspondent Atika Shubert and Arabic translators accused MEMRI of mistranslating portions of a Palestinian children’s television program.

“Media watchdog MEMRI translates one caller as saying — quote — ‘We will annihilate the Jews,”’ said Shubert. “But, according to several Arabic speakers used by CNN, the caller actually says ‘The Jews are killing us.”’

Wexner also supports CAMERA, a group which lies about the record of Palestinian Canon Naim Ateek, a leading Catholic anti-Occupation cleric:

CAMERA, another media watchdog group, has caught criticism for denying reliable reports of settlement expansions, leading the executive director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Donald Wagner, to describe CAMERA as “a well-known source of extremist pro-Israel propaganda that is routinely challenged by Israeli and international human rights and peace organizations for its consistent misrepresentation of the facts in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

She has also supported the leading neocon think-tank, the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies:

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies is a policy institute “founded shortly after 9/11 by a group of visionary philanthropists and policymakers to support the defense of democratic societies under assault by terrorism and militant Islamism,” according to its website.

However, the group has frequently been cited for pushing a hawkish U.S. foreign policy in Iraq and Iran, and the Christian Science Monitor called it one of the “top neocon think tanks.

Another top SWU donor is the wealthy Los Angeles funder and Aipac powerhouse, Larry Hochberg, who’s given $400,000 to SWU:

Larry and Andrew Hochberg contributed over 400,000 dollars to StandWithUs since 2005 and also contributed to FDD and Honest Reporting, another watchdog group that monitors the media and “exposes cases of bias” against Israel.

Much like MEMRI, Honest Reporting has come under attack for taking words and phrases out of context and for producing the documentary “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West.”

Twenty-eight million copies of the film were distributed by direct mail and newspaper inserts before the U.S. presidential election last November.

Honest Reporting, Aish Hatorah and Clarion Fund share a cozy ideological relationship (two brothers run all three groups) supporting extremist settlements, Islamophobic films like Obsession and Third Jihad, and Judaizing East Jerusalem.  They were also involved in lobbying for John McCain’s presidential candidacy through one of their websites.  To this day, no one has been able to uncover who contributed well over $15-million to manufacture and disseminate these DVDs.

SWU’s third-largest donors are Lawrence and Susan Post who:

Contributed just under 70,000 dollars to StandWithUs since 2005 and contributed to MEMRI and Christians United For Israel (CUFI), a U.S. “pro-Israel” Christian organization founded and chaired by controversial pastor John Hagee.

Rothstein has the chutzpah to blow smoke up our rear ends with this disingenuousness:

Asked if the philanthropy of their donors reflected a right-wing political leaning by StandWithUs, Rothstein rejected the idea.

“I don’t think it’s fair since our tent is pretty broad,” she said. “Some people call us ‘left of center, others call us ‘right of center’ and some call us ‘center.’”

“We see it as our job to help people understand that the founding document of Hamas calls for the elimination of Israel,” Rothstein added. “If J Street is interested in negotiating with Hamas — who are absolute fundamentalists and violent — it’s like a phony dream to want to sit down with someone who is intending to kill you.”

Some, like me call SWU what it is: far right pro-Israel.  As for Hamas, J Street isn’t “interested in negotiating with Hamas.”  But it does, along with Israeli military and intelligence analysts like Ephraim Halevy and Lt. Gen. Shlomo Brom and many others see a pragmatic purpose to Israel remaining open to talk to Hamas.  In fact, an Israeli poll found that Israelis themselves were willing to have their government talk to Hamas if it would help free Gilad Shalit or guarantee a ceasefire.  Which means that SWU is a Likudist, far-right phenomenon.  No one should be confused by Roz Rothstein’s smokescreen.  She ain’t just pro-Israel.  She’s pro-Likud and pro-settler.  And Eli Clifton’s investigation puts a few more nails in the group’s ideological coffin.

Eli also makes clear that each of these and other donors could have contributed much more than the amounts he discovered if they gave through donor directed funds or other means which would have concealed their specific connection to the contribution.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE