Comments on: Dov Hikind: Jewish Racist Advocates Religious Holy War, Building Third Temple

By: MuzzleWatch » Terrorist-supporting assemblyman Dov Hikind helps give adjunct professor the boot

Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:19:49 +0000

[...] Hikind is a bigot and a supporter of terrorism. He stood by 5 Jewish teenagers who severely beat a young Pakistani man with brass knuckles in a [...]

By: FASCIST RESPONSE TO ‘POLITICAL ISLAM’ « Desertpeace

FASCIST RESPONSE TO ‘POLITICAL ISLAM’ « Desertpeace — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:24:00 +0000

[...] At the Upper West Side event, Rabbi Shlomo Einhorn of the West Side synangogue will be speaking–despite telling someone organizing a protest against the event that the Kahane memorial is “not a west side institutional event” and that “somebody is renting our ballroom.” Also speaking will be Helen Freedman of Americans for a Safe Israel, a right-wing group that supports “Israel’s right…to the territories won in the 1967 war”; the talk-show host Barry Farber; and Brooklyn Assemblyman Dov Hikind, a right-wing Orthodox Jewish follower of Kahane who has advocated for the racial profiling of Arabs and Muslims in New York City. Hikind is an advocate for illegal Jewish settlement in occupied Palestine, and his wife runs “Ateret Cohanim, one of the chief Jewish groups forcibly Judaizing East Jerusalem,” as blogger Richard Silverstein put it. [...]

By: Upper West Side Synanogue and Brooklyn Jewish Center to Host Memorial Events for Far-right Extremist Meir Kahane | Alex Kane

Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:32:17 +0000

By: Greg

Greg — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:41:31 +0000

[your 2nd comment violation in as many days and it is an exact repeat of your previous one. Your comment privileges are suspended.]

By: Mary

Mary — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:47:04 +0000

They say something to start a “real discussion.”

By: Greg

Greg — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:25:52 +0000

[Ed. comment deleted for violation of comment rules.

No one here needs to read a litany of out of context quotations from long dead diplomats purporting to claim Israel's right to the Occupied Territories. We've debated each of the quotations you offered before and there's absolutely no need to do so yet again for what feels like the 100th time. If you have something personal to say from your own mouth, do so. But a comment consisting of 10 quotations from other sources is eye-glazingly dull & not the way to start a real discussion.]

By: Mary

Mary — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:11:38 +0000

Greg’s comment about the “valuable waterfront property” was so silly that I simply ignored it. If he was talking about the coast of the Gaza Strip, he should remember that Gaza is the world’s biggest open-air prison, and no one is about to be selling time shares for condos on the coast of the Gaza Strip.

Led by tyrants? Gee, I think putting 1.5 million people under siege, starving them, cutting off medical help, educational supplies, building supplies, destroying their infrastructure, throwing their elected government into prison, carpet bombing the whole thing, while in another area setting up hundreds and hundreds of checkpoints, demolishing homes, stealing water and land, indiscriminately shooting unarmed civilians and committing numerous other cruelties on a daily basis is pretty damned tyrannical. But we’re not talking about Fatah or Hamas, are we? We’re talking about benevolent, peaceful Israel.

By: Richard Silverstein

Richard Silverstein — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:54:34 +0000

If the issue were territory it would not be an issue since the Arabs control miles of valuabe waterfront territory. They just don’t do anything constructive with it since they would rather fight to have what they can’t have, Israel.

You know, I don’t mind people from the pro-Israel right coming here and arguing with us in the threads. In fact, I encourage such debate w. intelligent fair minded people. But it’s people like you who seem to think we’re total rubes and insult our intelligence w. such nonsense that really tick me off. The amt. of sheer ignorance & stupidity in this comment is boundless.

except they haven’t had to suffer the same experience.

Perhaps not. 6 million killed in the Holocaust. Only 700,000 expelled in the Nakba. But who’s counting, right? Would you accord more respect to Palestinian suffering if they too lost 6 million in the Nakba? Or would Jewish suffering still be sui generis?

The current situation is due to the Arabs not wanting to incorporate the “Palestinians” any more than Israel does.

Actually, the Arab states have absolutely no obligation to “incorporate” the Palestinians (btw write a comment here again with the word Palestinians in quotation marks & you’re history–read the comment rules before commenting) because they didn’t expel the Palestinians & Israeli Palestinians. Israel did that in 1948 & after. So it’s Israel’s responsibility to make some accomodation.

Jerusalem will never have divided rule again so long as Israel is in control

Ah yes, dream on. We have another Jim Bowie here prepared to fight to the end for his few yards of Jewish God-given land. BTW, Jerusalem WILL NOT BE divided, but it will be shared. Maybe over yr dead body. But it will be.

Why should anyone have sympathy for people lead by tyrants?

Tyrants? Palestinians are led by tyrants? Which one? And whichever one you choose, do you seriously mean to say that they’re any more tyrannical than Israeli leaders responsible for rivers of Palestinian and Israeli blood shed in wars & such?