Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for August, 2009

46% of Israelis Believe Homosexuality “a Perversion”

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

We’ve had a lively debate in this blog over the past week or so about the issue of how homosexuality is perceived in Israel.  The discussion coincidentally coincided with the horrific killings at the Tel Aviv gay suppport center which still, almost inexplicably, remain unsolved.

Several of my more pro-Israel readers have chafed at my description of Israel as a largely conservative, traditionalist (not just in a religious sense) society which frowns on homosexuality (among other modern phenomena).  One reader claimed that the fact that Israel permitted gays to serve in the military meant that Israel had quite a progressive approach to gays.  Another pointed to a survey in Wikipedia which ranked countries by their tolerance of homosexuality.

As far as I’m concerned, the truth has been laid out in a survey reported by Haaretz which found that 46% of Israelis believe that being gay is a “perversion:”

Almost half of the Israeli population believes that homosexuality is a perversion. A Haaretz-Dialog poll, conducted under Prof. Camil Fuchs finds that 46 percent of the people surveyed answered the question “Do you see homosexuality as a perversion?” in the affirmative, while 42 percent answered that it was not a perversion. Twelve percent said they did not know.

The survey also finds that 71 percent of the ultra-Orthodox population believe homosexuality is a perversion. So do 67 percent of the religious (Orthodox), 64 percent of the Arabs, 57 percent of the Russian-speaking immigrants, 44 percent of the observant (traditional) Jews and 24 percent of the secular population…

An international survey conducted in 2007 revealed that the positions regarding homosexuality in Israel were less liberal than in other Western countries, but more liberal than in Russia, Ukraine and South Korea. The level of homophobia in Israel is close to the level in Bulgaria, he said.

This comparative ranking is NOT something to write home about.

Nevertheless, an Israeli gay leader did try to look on the bright side and you’ve got to admire him for trying:

Yaniv Weizman, head of Tel Aviv’s gay youth organization, said “It comes as no surprise to me that almost half the public thinks I’m mentally ill and should be imprisoned, treated or killed. However, I feel we’ve made some progress. If 26 percent of the religious and 27 percent of the Arabs say we’re not perverts, you can say we’ve achieved something.”

Undoubtedly these attitudes will further liberalize over time as they are here in the U.S. and in other western countries.  But to claim that Israel is an oasis of tolerance in the Middle East or to claim as the Israeli foreign ministry and the hardline pro-Israel group StandWithUs does, that gays should rally in Israel’s favor and against Iran because of the intolerance with which they are treated in the latter country–is entirely bogus.

In truth, Israel has much more work to do before it can be recognized as a tolerant society.  And the tolerance is called for not just regarding gays, but regarding ALL minorities including the country’s Palestinian citizens.

The Tablet and David Axelrod’s Bubbeh’s B.O.

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

I know The Tablet is a project of Nextbook, which has a fairly serious reputation among Jewish literati and that it features Alana Newhouse as editor, whose work I admired when she helped edit The Forward (disclosure: she was the only editor who ever accepted anything of mine for publication there for which I am ever thankful).

But the writing, political orientation, and editorial choices of Tablet strike me as bordering on the bizarre.  I suppose they’re competing with sites like Heeb, Zeek, Jewcy and Jewlicious for the most outre, hip, cool iterations of Jewish identity. But I find the attempt falls flat.

Last week, I took Tablet to task for featuring a major story on the wondrous achievement of the first gay porno flick featuring an all-Israeli cast and the producer’s boast that his efforts amounted to doing Israel a favor by promoting its extraordinary beauty and vital society.  You’ll have to excuse me while I giggle over the self-serving hypocrisy involved in this self-promotion.

This week, the magazine continues along a similar path by promoting the launch of one of the flimsiest excuses for an organization to grace the Jewish stage in a long time.  Z Street (no accident that they chose the last letter of the alphabet as all the others undoubtedly refused to participate), presents itself as the uber-tough guy among hardline pro-Israel groups.  Its “leaders” are two of the most laughable Jews ever to beg for media attention.  The Tablet snippet about the group does contain a great deal of perhaps inadvertent comedy (at Z Street’s expense):

Lori Lowenthal Marcus telling it like it isnt

Lori Lowenthal Marcus telling it like it isn't

Z Street founder Lori Lowenthal Marcus…compares her efforts to those undertaken by American Jews who fought to draw attention to Nazi atrocities during World War II.

Ah yes, the ever-popular-with-right-wing-pro-Israeli-types Nazi meme.  They’re shouting from the rooftops about the world’s perfidy against Israel and the mortal danger in which the tiny, vulnerable state finds itself.  Bravo for these brave Warsaw ghetto heroines!  Lowenthal Marcus’ blog is titled (seriously) No More Boxcars.

But how will her group be different from political allies like the Zionist Organization of America and Young Israel? “We intend to be more activist, not so involved with the academic side and the lobbying side,” Marcus told Tablet.

I really had not idea there was any “academic” component to ZOA or Young Israel.  I frankly was under the impression that Mort Klein was a pandering, ranting, fulminating maniac.  I had no idea he had a PhD (he doesn’t) and did rigorous research to come up with his pro-Israel tirades.

“We want to have people’s attention grabbed and then confront them with the facts that have been obscured by the current discussion on the Middle East.”

Lowenthal Marcus wouldn’t know a fact if it jumped up and bit her, especially not one related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Currently, she’s working to get comedians in on the effort: “Humor is not a tool that’s been used from the [sic] staunchly pro-Israel organizational efforts.”

Now, THAT is truly funny!  I can see it now: the comedy stylings of that staunch (and FUNNY) anti-jihadi Islamophobe Jackie Mason, at a benefit concert hosted by Daniel Pipes and David Horowitz on behalf of the Jewish Bobbsey Twins of Z Street.

The Tablet does get a dig in at Lowenthal Marcus’ partner in pro-Israel “crime,” Allyson Rowen Taylor, for her accusation against Adam Horowitz that he supported the murder of his fellow Jews through his work for the American Friends Service Committee.  By the way, Cecilie Surasky and I provided that information to The Forward reporter who wrote the original story about that nasty smear.

Is it any wonder that after I wrote my first post ridiculing Z Street that this sort of garbage graced by spam filter:

Z Street
[email protected]
66.45.240.66

We at Z Street are offering for sale Richard Silverstein’s foreskin with his penis still attached. It is our way of saying thanks to all those who support our now campaign against treason and self-hatred.

Probably not quite the pornographic style even of low-lifes like Rowen Taylor and Lowenthal-Marcus, but birds of a feather do flock together.  By the way, there are a number of other similar offerings also written in Z Street’s name.

If you’d like to be “entertained” by more anti-J Street Jewish wingnut hysteria get a load of Pam Geller at Atlas Farted (er, Shrugged).

Finally, the Tablet features an entirely tasteless and unfunny attempt to portray David Axelrod as the self-hating Jew that Bibi Netanyahu has called him.  The short piece is meant as parody, but there is entirely no humor or wit in it which is very sad.  It was written by Gabriel Sanders who’s written for The Forward and even Vanity Fair.  Suffice to say, this isn’t his best effort.  The following purports to be from Axelrod’s personal diary:

Woke up at 5:30. Total of three hours of sleep. Finished health care strategy memo around 2 and then spent a half hour reading Mondoweiss on the separation wall. Good stuff. Examined face through bloodshot eyes. That beak! It’s not getting any smaller. Thought the mustache would maybe minimize it, but all it does is make me look more hairy. Caught glimpse of Washington Monument out the window. Kind of reminds me of the mezuzah that hung on the door of grandma’s Lower East Side tenement. What a horror show that place was. Reeked of cabbage and B.O.

Well, you get the idea.  I kinda thought that jokes about bubbeh’s B.O. would be treif for all sorts of reasons.  But I guess when you’re desperate everything’s game.  Alana, you can do better.

H/t Joel Katz.

Israeli Peace Activist’s Head Slammed into IDF Jeep During Anti-Wall Demonstration

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009
Palestinian villager confronts Israeli soldier during anti-Wall demonstration (<a href=

Palestinian villager confronts Israeli soldier during anti-Wall demonstration (Activestills.org)

Haggai Matar is an Israeli peace activist.  Almost by accident, I happened on his Hebrew language account (temporarily taken down until it is published), then called Chronicle of Violence, of a brutal attack on him by the IDF during an demonstration against the Separation Wall in the West Bank village of Masara last week.  An IDF soldier slammed Matar’s head into the door of a jeep multiple times drawing large quantities of blood and requiring medical treatment.  The brutality of the incident and the surrealism of an IDF videographer videotaping a subsequent assault, while simultaneously asking him how he had been previously injured, made a very strong impression.  It’s a beautiful piece of writing.  The photo accompanying this story is from the same demonstration and is part of a powerful gallery documenting the day’s events.  The angle at which the photographer shot the picture conveys the dominance and brutality of the looming Israeli soldier over the nonetheless defiant Palestinian woman.  She somehow refuses to acknowledge her powerlessness as she holds her hand against his gun as if to ward it off.  This is the story of the Occupation writ small.  Matar’s story will be published in the Israeli paper, Ha-Ir this week.

I am publishing the English translation by Dimi Reider and Rela Mezali here:

The soldiers charged the wedding procession using their rifles to push people back. Behind the procession, two couples of newlyweds, two suits, two bridal gowns, looked on in shock. It was horrifying. I was standing even further behind, taking pictures, but I couldn’t bear the sight of what I was witnessing. One of the soldiers threw back my friend A., and she nearly fell to the ground. The line of soldiers continued its approach and within seconds I was getting my share too. I started shouting, “What are you doing?! It’s a wedding! It’s these people’s day of celebration!” I don’t know why I picked that phrase, but I kept on shouting “it’s their day of celebration” time and time again as the soldiers pressed on with their assault. I saw clearly that they couldn’t care less, that they didn’t understand that it was these people’s day of celebration, and in the heat of it all I yelled out, “Assholes!”. I don’t normally do things like that. Over the ten years in which I’ve been roaming the West Bank I have always managed to keep my calm with the soldiers, to explain as best I can what we are struggling for. But this time the situation was so absolutely intolerable that it just came out. And it got their attention. “Bring him in,” the officer said and the soldiers charged. They were pulling me one way as the wedding procession-demonstrators pulled me the other way.

The soldiers won. On the way to their military jeep they twisted my arms and beat me. I kept calling out that I wasn’t resisting the arrest, until a hand clutched my throat and I suddenly couldn’t breathe much less shout. Soldiers who passed by the group dragging me to the jeep pulled at my hair or added their own punch or two. Eventually I was placed upright behind a military jeep, far from the crowd, and I thought that at least I was over the worst. Then it landed; the first blow. My head was smashed against the jeep door. “What are you doing?! I’m not resis…,” I tried to protest when once again a hand from behind bashed my head onto the door. Two policemen approached, one of them hoisting a video recorder. The one who wasn’t recording asked me to put my hands out in front of me so that I could be handcuffed, but the soldiers started twisting them behind my back again. I asked the policeman to help me, but he just stood there and watched. Eventually the soldiers allowed me the liberty of placing my hands in the handcuffs.

Then I saw the blood. First a few drops on my hands and then more and more, totally soaking first my t-shirt then my trousers. This frightening warmth streaming down my face, dripping off my beard onto my clothes, my hands, the asphalt. The policeman with the recorder asked what had happened and I began to explain. From behind me, an un-shaven reservist with a pierced ear, probably the soldier who had done it, interrupted and said I’d fallen and bruised myself. I couldn’t take it. No more of these sickening lies. I shouted that he was a liar, a piece of shit. He slapped me hard, right in front of the camera, my head still bleeding, my hands cuffed. I tried to make the policeman understand the gravity of what had just happened and to file a complaint for assault, but he just went on filming. A military medic came by, protesting and grumbling about having to treat me. He wiped some of the blood off my forehead and stuck a piece of adhesive tape on the wound. “I’m sorry to say you’ll live,” he said, and walked away. The soldier who had been beating me gave me some water to drink and to wash my hands with.

A few minutes later two more friends were arrested, and they took us to the local police station. We were informed that we were being accused of entering a sealed military zone (though no one had declared one while we had been there), and of assaulting the unit commander.

Gaza, My Love, Haggai Matars bloodstained t-shirt after IDF physical assault

"Gaza, My Love," Haggai Matar's bloodstained t-shirt after IDF physical assault

We spent the long hours at the station arguing with our guards, a Russian-born reservist and a Russian-born policeman. In fact, we were conducting two very different and parallel debates. The reserve soldier was arguing philosophy, heatedly defending an extreme capitalist notion that each individual determines his own fate, that no individual life can be compared with any others, and that whoever is strong enough is perfectly entitled to crush other, weaker people. Yes, the Nazis too, he confirmed. The policeman was arguing local politics. “How do you know the border is where you say it is? How do you know we’re outside Israel?” he asked. He had no knowledge of the 1967 borders or of their legal status in Israeli and international law. And he didn’t care. He did care about the Palestinians’ theft of water. “Why should I have to pay for water only to find out, on my patrols with the Civil Administration, that the Arabs install pirate connections to our water lines and steal our water?” He didn’t care that this was water that belonged to the Palestinians in the first place, that they are allocated five times less water than the neighboring settlers, and that they are forced to pay four times as much for ever cubic meter. A law’s a law.

After the interrogation we spoke to the local officer, a pleasant, apparently intelligent man. When we told him that I needed medical attention he made sure we were released as soon as possible (not before being slammed with a restriction order banning us from the village and from the area of Gush Etzion for two weeks). Seeing us off to the station gate he asked us if we were really welcome in the Palestinian village. He couldn’t come to grips with the idea of us being wanted guests there, that we sometimes sleep there, that we’ve formed friendships there now going back three years, that one of the village activists and I call each other “brother”, and that friends from the village were here in their car to pick us up at the police station. His expression, as he shut the gate, was still bemused.

At the hospital in Tel Aviv, I was welcomed by a male nurse, who – I immediately recognized – was a Palestinian citizen of Israel. He was touched by my bloodied T-shirt inscribed “Gaza Habibti” (which, in Arabic, means “Gaza, my love”). We spoke in Arabic about what had happened, about the soldiers and about resistance. He said how important it was that there’s resistance, and that he himself would not join – he was too scared of finding himself in a predicament like mine. But he supported us, he really did.

Friday night in the ER is a weary time. There’s an accident here, some party-goers there, and everything takes forever. Three and a half hours, and I’m finally in the stitching room. I’m lying on the bed, the physician injects me local aesthesis and covers up my face with a cloth with an opening around the wound. “So what kind of a protest was it?,” the student nurse asked. “I’d really rather not talk about it just now,” I replied, not relishing this discussion while being stitched up. “So, you’re like an anarchist?” she insisted. “I wouldn’t call it that, no.” “So what would you call it?” “A person who cares, a social activist, a Leftist activist.” “Hold on, what’s Right and what’s Left? Which ones want to give away our country to the Arabs?” “The Left. They’re really smart, and never wrong about anything, and they want peace and justice,” the physician chimed in as he made his stitches. “Like the hippies in the 1980′s?” the nurse inquired (sic). “No, not really. But they love the Arabs and want to give them the country. Perhaps they should go to Norway, where there are lots more like them. Maybe the Norwegians will give their country to the Arabs, they’ll probably be pleased to.” “What, the Norwegians would do that?” “They haven’t said so, but they probably would. Tell me, are there any Arabs who love peace and who demonstrate?” I knew the last barb had been directed at me. I have a clear memory of observing to myself throughout the entire procedure that I felt as if I was being raped: ‘He’s leaning over me, stitching me up, and all along he’s mocking me, humiliating me, degrading everything I stand for.’ I didn’t know what to do. I replied. “Yes. It was a demonstration and a Palestinian wedding party. I was a there as a guest.” “Oh, so there are Arabs who want to give the country to the Jews?” the nurse mocked. “It’s not that simple,” I managed to mumble. “Of course not,” the doctor declared coyly. “Don’t worry, we’re giving you the best treatment we can, no matter whether you’re Left or Right,” the nurse suddenly noted. “This time,” the doctor said pointedly as he cut off the last thread and got up. I was so appalled I could barely concentrate on the instructions they gave me, repeatedly contradicting each other anyway as they explained them. I think I’m supposed not to wash the area for two days, and to come back six days after treatment to take out the stitches.

That was it. My wonderful friends waited there all along, with me, supporting me, telling stories, trying to speed things up. I can’t thank them enough. I drove those of them who needed rides back to their homes.

As I write this, back at my place, it’s three AM. I know that my trusty biological alarm will wake me up at half past eight. For the first time since it all started, just looking in the mirror, I’ve seen the stitches, the bruises on my face and hands, the caked blood. I’ve washed off what I can without getting the stitches wet. I’m off to bed. My cat joins in. It’s over.

But not really. There are stitches to attend to, a complaint to file with the Military Police against the soldiers who beat me up, a complaint to file against Ichilov hospital… who knows what else.

And it’s not over because they are still out there. Because they said that as of next week there would be a daily curfew from 5AM, to prevent demonstrations. It’s not over because people here don’t have the slightest understanding of borders, whether geographical or otherwise. Perhaps because there aren’t really any borders there anymore.

Eric Cantor Leads Republican AIPAC-Hosted Israel Junket

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Rep. Eric Cantor, who has the distinction of being the last Jew left in the Republican Party–er, Congress–is leading an Aipac-hosted junket** to Israel accompanied by 25 other dutiful Republicans paying obeisance to the Lobby.  They’re touting this as the largest Congressional delegation ever to visit Israel.  Republican pliability when it comes to Israel is meant to contrast with the continuing tension between the Bibi government and the Obama administration.  Bibi is only too happy to roll out the red carpet for Israel’s water carriers in Congress, while he strikes tough guy poses toward Obama. Haaretz too rolled out the red carpet giving Cantor prime editorial real estate to propound his Likudist approach to the Israeli-Arab conflict.

This explains the expulsion of two East Jerusalem Palestinian families who’ve lived in their homes for 56 years only to be thrown on the street by the Israeli police under orders from Jerusalem’s rightist mayor, who wishes to make Arab East Jerusalem safe for Bibilical theme parks funded by Irving Moskowitz and his henchmen.  The Bibi-Barkat plan seems to entail that certain key areas to be made Palestinian-rein.  Maybe after they achieve this goal they’ll create a Museum of the Palestinian as a memorial to everything they’ve destroyed.  I seem to recall an earlier tyrant in European history who planned to create such a monument to Jewish history and culture once he achieved his own diabolical ends.

Not that Bibi-Barkat seeks to exterminate Palestinians as that other mass murderer did.  No, the Israeli rightists only plan to make the Palestinians disappear whereever they stand in the way of plans to establish Jewish dominance in greater Jerusalem.  Not to mention poking a finger in the eye of a troublesome U.S. president who actually demands–gasp!–that Israel honor international law, the Road Map, and previously declared U.S. policy concerning a settlement freeze.

The great tormentors of the Jews too must’ve had their ministers and masterminds who devised their evil plans.  So too do Israeli leaders have Moskowitz, the evil genius of the settler movement.  Mussolini made the trains run on time.  Eichmann ensured that they were filled with Jews on their way to death.  Moskowitz is not as great an evil genius.  He merely provides the funding and the wherewithal for the movement to eradicate Palestinians from East Jerusalem.

Bitter, yes. Cynical, maybe.  But is it not justified.  Look at this video and tell me, even if you’re pro-Israel, that you don’t have a twinge of conscience about this expulsion.

Speaking of expulsion, this is the season of Tisha B’Av, the day of mourning commemorating the destruction of the Holy Temple and the exile of Jews from their land.  We Jews seem to have forgotten in the midst of our own mourning, the suffering we are imposing on the Palestinian people.  For people of Moskowitz’s ilk, there is one true suffering–Jewish suffering.  As for Palestinians, they do not suffer.  Or if they do, it’s their own fault.  If they’d just cooperate with our aims and leave peaceably, there wouldn’t need to be any of this foolishness of forced expulsion.

**”Cantor and Hoyer’s trips will reportedly be underwritten by the American Israel Education Foundation, a charitable organization affiliated with the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee.”
Agence France Press

Seattle StandWithUs Leader Accuses Me of Being ‘Deranged,’ a ‘Fraud,’ ‘Fascinated’ With Gay Porn, Urges ‘Spanking’

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Several weeks ago, a local progressive Jewish congregation, Kadima, hosted a Shabbat talk by Canon Naim Ateek, a Palestinian Christian anti-Occupation cleric.  Two days before the event, the Seattle Jewish federation mailed a letter to Kadima telling it that it was making a big mistake in hosting an anti-Israel, anti-Semitic, Jew-hating Palestinian speaker.  Needless, to say Ateek is none of those things.  Thankfully, Kadima did not cancel his talk.

Unfortunately for the community, very few people knew what the letter actually said since those who wrote it and those who received it refused to divulge it.  A brave soul did provide the letter to me, which is the only way that you know what it said.  I have already critiqued the inadequacies of the letter and criticized those who signed it.  I have also praised those who were asked and refused to sign it.

I singled out for condemnation David Brumer, a signatory of the letter and a board member of the hardline Israel advocacy group, StandWithUs.  Unlike some of the others who signed, Brumer proudly used his employer and job title along with his signature.  He is a social worker at the Kline Galland Home, where he presumably attempts to ease the burdens of elderly Jews in our community.  Apparently, Kline Galland, a federation funded agency, has no problem with Brumer confusing his partisan political activities with his job.  I have written to the Home’s two senior executives to clarify the agency’s policy on this matter.  They haven’t replied.

Brumer took my attack personally, VERY personally.  In fact, in an e-mail to me he called me “deranged,” a “fraud,” and “fascinated” with gay porn.  A word about the latter charge: in a recent blog post I noted that StandWithUs has recruited American gays to take Israel junkets in order to co-opt their support for Israel.  Alongside this, the Israeli foreign ministry has targeted Iran’s intolerance for gays as a point of leverage in its efforts to set the stage for an attack on Iran.  I have little doubt that StandWithUs’ journey into the gay world is directly connected to the efforts against Iran.

I wrote a critical blog post about a gay porno movie filmed in Israel with an all-Israeli cast.  That was how Brumer managed to dredge up the homophobic smear that I had a “subconscious fascination” with gay porn.  Here is the text of his message to me:

Solipsist that you are, it occurred to me that you may remain unaware of the fact that I’ve helped expose you to the world for the fraud, hypocrite, and paranoid narcissist that you are, in my very own blog, BRUMSPEAK. Check it out. It circulates widely.

Btw, the gay porn hasbara shtick is very creative. Only a deranged mind like yours could come up with that one. Perhaps some subconscious fascination with the subject?

Keep in mind, this is a Jewish leader who the federation asked to sign the Kadima letter because it found him to be a credible figure in the community.  Also, keep in mind that Brumer signed a 2004 Derech Eretz statement calling for all signatories to:

…Exhibit…respect and communication, trusting in each other’s good intentions, and rejecting personal or malicious attacks, as we debate issues pertaining to Israel, the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, peace in the Mideast, and the wider Jewish community.

This is a community leader who also called for me to be “spanked” for holding the views I do.  Since he sat on the board of Congregation Beth Sholom at the time (where I am a member), I had to ask the synagogue president to intercede and end the slanders.  Thankfully, she did so.  Now that Brumer is no longer bound by such strictures (he’s off the board), he’s unburdened himself and unbuttoned his mouth.

I freely acknowledge that I have used strong language in my criticism of both Brumer and the attacks on Naim Ateek and Kadima in the federation letter.  I have called some statements by both lies and distortions.  But unlike Brumer, I have documented my claims here in this blog.

In an e-mail, the president of the federation, Richard Fruchter, sensibly tried to distance himself from Brumer saying he is not a member of the Israel committee which created the letter and not affiliated with federation.  The problem is that the federation asked Brumer to sign the letter thereby affiliating itself with him and his extremist views.  Fruchter sees Brumer’s smears against me as a dispute between two individuals in which the agency has no interest.

But the problem once again is that Brumer and federation are locked into a tight embrace.  They invited him to sign.  He co-opted his employer, a federation agency, in signing.  It seems to me that they’re up to their eyeballs in this and somebody should have some explaining to do.

I was tickled by Brumer’s claim that his blog “circulates widely.”  Alexa ranks it 14-million which does not constitute “circulating widely.”  Unless he really meant “circulates widely within my own family and among StandWithUs militants.”  I was also tickled by his references to psychological-therapeutic jargon in attempting to [mis]diagnose me.  It’s as if he needs to dust off all the theories he learned in social work school to prove he can apply them to his clients and wield them as a cugdel against his enemies.  If he keeps this up he might just give the vocation of social work a bad name.

Returning to the federation letter, it was signed by only 12 community leaders (two of whom work for federation).  Yet the letter was circulated to every rabbi and community leader in the city, scores, if not hundreds of individuals.  The fact that only 12 signed is a good sign.  It means that many leaders of our community thought the letter was a bad idea.  I’m hoping there are some federation board members who are asking some pointed questions of Richard Fruchter as I write this.  One question I’d like asked is why the Israel committee is such a monolith.  Why doesn’t it have a mandate that compels it to approach the Israel issue in a diverse way that encourages debate?  Why do the local Israel lobby groups, via this committee, have a stranglehold on the communal agenda on this subject?

One of my major criticisms of the mainstream community is that it exists in an echo chamber.  Jewish leaders largely don’t want to hear diverse voices in their community.  The problem with doing this is that by narrowing the scope of what is considered kosher, you end up with blunders like this letter.

Let’s have a dialogue about this within the community.  Let’s learn a lesson.  Let’s figure out how we can encourage a broad debate about such a critical issue and not smear our fellow Jews just because they don’t see things the same as us.  Instead of seeking ways to exclude Brit Tzedek and Kadima from the community, as the Israel committee was seeking to do, let’s embrace them.  Let’s end the grandstanding and wagging fingers represented by the Ateek-Kadima letter.

I’m looking forward to the next major community program the Israel committee plans providing a balanced, diverse perspective on whatever issue it addresses.  And I don’t mean “diverse” by David Brumer’s standards.  I mean “diverse” by Kadima’s standards or any number of other local Jewish peace organizations who are largely omitted from the organized community’s discussions.  Federation leaders–do you think you can do this?

The federation recently announced it has had a down campaign.  Allocations to agencies are being cut.  Of course, there are lots of reasons for this, many of them economic.  But Jews in this town are sophisticated, articulate, progressive and concerned with social justice.  Many don’t like what they see going on in Israel.  Many don’t agree with the perspective offered by the Israel committee or StandWithUs.  In fact, a number of polls indicate that Jewish young people are more turned off than ever from Israel in the aftermath of the bloody conflicts in Lebanon and Gaza.

If the federation continues preaching to this relatively small choir, it can’t help its Campaign.  It can’t help it’s outreach efforts to the next generation of donors.

Anti-Gay Incitement, the Shame of Shas, and the Tel Aviv Anti-Gay Massacre

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009
At Maran's ("our rabbi and teacher") table (Biderman/Haaretz)

At Maran's ("our Shas rabbi and teacher") table (Biderman/Haaretz)

Dramatis Personnae (with dialogue)

Eli Yishai [Shas leader]: “They are sick people”
Shlomo Benziri [former minister, in prison uniform]: “In the past they used to be stoned”
Nissim Zeev: “They will come back as hares and rabbits”
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef
Ahmadinejad: “We no longer have that phenomenon”

This is a cartoon by Haaretz’s Amos Biderman which takes on the ugly homophobia and incitement by Israel’s Sephardi religious party, Shas, in light of the anti-gay massacre in Tel Aviv yesterday. Eli Yishai, the Party’s current leader and current government minister has, in the past, called homosexuality a disease. The Party’s spiritual leader, Rabbi Yosef (at whose “table” they all sit), has blamed all manner of national catastrophe on gays. Shlomo Benziri (in prison pinstripes) is a former Party leader convicted of bribery and serving a four year jail term.

The crowning irony of this graphic is that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad joins his fellow religious fundamentalists in fundamentally misunderstanding the nature of homosexuality. Though Iran and Israel may be on a collision course, Biderman is telling us that “their” crazies and ours aren’t so different.

After John F. Kennedy was assassinated, Malcolm X said it was a case of the chickens of coming home to roost.  That is, that the very violence that Kennedy had not done enough to avert in the case of American Blacks eventually took his own life.  In the case of Shas, just as in the case of the extremist settlers who likened Rabin to a Nazi and called for his death (and got their wish), so the chickens of incitement have come home to roost.  In politics, words matter even though so many of them are empty lies.  And in this case, some Israeli nutcase very well may have taken to heart the preaching of Shas and similar religious ranters.

In many societies crimes against gays and prostitutes are hardest to solve because the police have a natural antipathy to the victims and also don’t understand the social milieu in which they live.  I only hope that the fact that the killer is still at large is not an indication of this in the case in the Tel Aviv massacre.

Yossi Sarid has written an especially powerful denunciation of Israeli homophobia in Haaretz.  One interesting sidebar of his column is his attack upon an Israeli government plan to use Iran’s intolerance of homosexuals in order to besmirch that nation in the world’s eyes:

I…recently read…that Israel will escalate its public relations campaign against Iran. Our foreign ministry plans to enlist the gay and lesbian community worldwide to expose the persecution of homosexuals led by the ayatollahs and their people. We should hope that this campaign is being undertaken with the blessing of the entire coalition, some of whose members have characterized homosexuals as “deviants who should be put to death.”

The anti-Iranian campaign has now been short-circuited and poured down the drain.

H/t to Sol Salbe.

Israeli Foreign Minister’s Indictment Imminent

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

Israeli police indicate that Avigdor Lieberman’s indictment is near.  For months, rumors have swirled about charges of moneylaundering, influence peddling and outright corruption.  Now the moment that many of us have been waiting for:

Police are close to submitting a recommendation to indict Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on charges of fraud, money laundering, breach of trust and obstruction of justice, sources involved in the investigation said.

According to a police source the investigation is “practically over,” and the body of evidence is sufficient to support an indictment on the charges.

The Haaretz story fleshes out many of the charges against Lieberman:

The indictment taking shape suggests Lieberman managed a well-oiled business machine through front men even after taking public office, and made millions of dollars. Lieberman and his associates are suspected of establishing several companies, some of them shell companies, in order to launder millions of shekels and funnel them into his own pockets. Police have investigated whether Lieberman continued running these alleged operations even after becoming a public official.

In addition, police believe Lieberman and his associates tried to obstruct the police investigation in at least three separate instances, by changing the names of companies he allegedly established in Cyprus after he suspected the police had identified them.

Haaretz has learned that Lieberman earned more than NIS 2.5 million as a salaried employee of his daughter’s company from 2004-2006, when he was neither a Knesset member nor a cabinet minister. According to information obtained by Haaretz, between 2004 and 2007 the company headed by Michal Lieberman, M.L. 1, received NIS 11 million from anonymous sources overseas for “business consulting.”

Another Haaretz probe revealed that in 2001 an Austrian company owned by Jewish gambling tycoon Martin Schlaff transferred $650,000 to a Cypriot company, Trasimeno Trading, which police believe was controlled by Lieberman.

This is yet another tawdry episode documenting the corruption at the heart of Israeli politics (especially Israeli right-wing politics, viz. Olmert’s earlier indictment on similar charges).  If the indictment happens, pressure will mount for Lieberman to resign.  When (not if) he does so, Bibi will have an opportunity to reshape his governing coalition by possibly approaching Tzipi Livni to join his government.  It remains to be seen whether either Bibi or Livni would want to do this.  But if he did and she accepted, then there might be some possibility of forming a government that could actually reciprocate Obama administration entreaties for Israeli moderation regarding settlements and peace negotiations.  But the likelihood of a Bibi approach to Tzipi, her acceptance, and an actual moderation of Israeli policy is very small.

And though we may lose Lieberman from the Israeli political scene, unfortunately there are a hundred more mediocrities just like him or worse lining up to take his place.  The cesspoool that is Israeli politics can’t be cleaned up by the removal of a single corrupt individual, just as the right-wing political mafia can’t be dented by the toppling from power of a single individual, no matter how noxious he might be.

What I would welcome though about a Lieberman indictment is that it would send his ambition to be prime minister absolutely off the rails.  Those of us who did not relish an out and out Kahanist taking the reins of government will be relieved at least in this small achievment .

Tel Aviv Gay Massacre

Saturday, August 1st, 2009
Mourners weep outside Israeli gay community center after killing rampage (Jonathan Nackstrand/AFP-Getty)

Mourners weep outside Israeli gay community center after killing rampage (Jonathan Nackstrand/AFP-Getty)

In this blog, we’ve been having a lively debate about the nature of gay life in Israel (see comment thread).  It’s terribly sad and ironic that our discussion has been punctuated by this horrible news of a homocidal/homophobic attack on an Israel gay community center in Tel Aviv.  A gunman clad entirely in black opened fire with an automatic weapon on a group of gay teenagers who were attending a weekly support group.  A boy and girl died on the spot and a third died in hospital [NOTE: Israeli media say that 2 died, but Agence France Presse claims an Israeli "official" reported a third died.  This appears inaccurate.]

No one should make the mistake of over-generalizing about whether this attack represents a broader trend of homophobia in Israeli society.  As I wrote here earlier, Israel is certainly less homophobic than surrounding Arab states, but less tolerant than many western nations.  Anti-gay attacks have taken place in other places though I can’t remember such a serial murder in the U.S. or other places.

I think it’s best to let a leader of the Israeli gay community speak on the subject:

“It is not surprising that such a crime can be committed given the incitement of hatred against the homosexual community,” the president of Tel Aviv’s gay and lesbian community, Mai Pelem, told reporters.

In the past, swastikas had been painted at the entrance to the center.

The head of Israel’s gay and lesbian national association, Mike Hamel, said: “In our worst nightmares we could not have imagined that the hatred against our community, which is hurting nobody, could go this far.”

Haaretz’s story quotes a survivor:

“At about 10.40 P.M. someone came over, all dressed in black and wearing a black mask,” he recounted the unfolding of the incident. “I thought it was a joke at first, but he immediately opened fire. People took cover under the bed and tables, but there were no screams. I hid under a table with someone else. It’s a small place; there’s just one terrace. Once you’re inside, there’s nowhere to run.”

Gil came to the center every week to take part in activities for teenagers.

…”I love this place,” Gil concluded, “but I don’t know if I will ever go back there. I want to, but it’s too soon to say.

I was disturbed to hear that the police have closed a gay bar that abutted the community center. UPDATE: Reuters reports this deeply distressing development:

Israeli media said police had warned other gay clubs in Tel Aviv to close for fear of a follow-up attack.

Why?  Why should gays slink back to their homes, draw the curtains and retreat to the closet??  You’d think the police would insist that they remain open and provide security to ensure the safety of all customers. Closing the city’s gay bars gives the attacker a victory of sorts and casts doubt on where the priorities of the police lie.

In a comment in another thread here, Hasbara Buster posted this quotation from the Jerusalem Post:

“I warned in a column last year that Israel is a place which, on the one hand has liberal laws, but on the other does not attempt to counter homophobia,” Danny Zak, a gay activist and journalist, told the Post during the demonstration. “A murder was waiting to happen,” Zak added.

“The Shas party has the blood of two innocent kids on their hands,” he said. “Shas has blamed gays for earthquakes and diseases. This is incitement, but no one is put on trial for it,” he said.

Zak has begun to probe the main issue here.  But to go farther, minorities in Israel are always second-class citizens whether they be Arab citizens or gays.  There is no fundamental understanding or appreciation for human rights within Israeli society because there is no constitution that protects them as a foundational principle.  So at best minorities in Israel are tolerated.  Until the Occupation is ended and Israel faces the deficencies in its social contract, there will be more such violence.

And we should make no mistake by seeing the killings of Israeli Arabs on a bus by a homicidal settler or of Palestinian farmers by Israeli settlers as any different than the killing of gay Israeli teenagers.  The killer’s rage may stem from slightly different sources but the problem is the same in every case: Israel does not understand the rights of the individual or the value of the minority.

H/t to Alex Stein.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE