Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for August, 2009

Israeli Soldier Kidnapped

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

UPDATE: The Jerusalem Post is claiming that all IDF soldiers have been accounted for and the kidnapping apparently was a false alarm.  Thanks to reader Nathan for bringing this to my attention.

An astonishing development in Israel: the IDF has announced and a Palestinian militant group confirmed that it abducted an Israeli soldier in the center of Israel.  Though the police have thrown up roadblocks throughout the area, given the announcement from the abductors that they’d completed the operation, it seems likely they have made their escape.  It goes without saying that this new development complicates everything.  It complicates the negotiations for Gilad Shalit’s freedom (the other abducted IDF soldier held by Hamas).  It complicates U.S. attempts for a settlement freeze.  Whenever Israel’s security is threatened, Israelis retreat into a security shell and are unwilling to entertain the idea of flexibility in any form.

This kidnapping is unlike the previous Shalit event because the latter was captured while on duty on the Israeli border with Gaza.  This one occured within Israel proper and means that the kidnappers infiltrated the country and procured a car.  All this would entail a fairly extensive operation involving a number of co-conspirators.  This will shock Israel and rattle the nerves of the entire country.  The Shin Bet will be on the carpet for this major breach of national security.  Policitians will outdo themselves in nationalist bellicosity.  There will be calls for retaliation and worse.  It will get ugly.

Almost no one in Israel will face the nasty truth that the status quo is not viable.  That there will always be horrible events like this unless there is real peace with real negotiations and real compromises in which each side gives up something it doesn’t want to give up.  Israelis naturally prefer to be lulled by things as they are.  They don’t like to contemplate giving up anything for the sake of an unknown.  It seems almost an impossibility to convince them otherwise in the midst of such trauma.  How do you ask a human being to look past the current woe to see that the only way to avoid future woe is by stepping into the unknown; and that the unknown is better than the known because the former will only lead to more such trauma?

David Brumer and His Acolytes Rant

Thursday, August 13th, 2009
Brumer (or his acolytes) speak

Brumer (or his acolytes) speak

David Brumer is an executive committee member of StandWithUs/Northwest and the Seattle chapter of the American Jewish Committee.  He is one of Seattle’s leading enforcers for the pro-Israel right, making sure that anyone dissenting from the party line gets a good whack in the shins.  While I was always under the impression that social workers were practitioners of the healing arts, he also serves in that capacity at the Jewish federation funded Kline Galland Home which, aside from his employment there, actually has a good repuation for geriatric care.

Brumer has made it his business to smear me with epithets like “deranged,” and suggested I may be “fascinated” with gay porn, and that I should be spanked for my supposed hostility to Israel.  But now Brumer’s acolytes have gotten into the act.  Someone posting here as Brum Speaks has published scores of smutty comments here which I think the world should see.  Given the IP address, this probably isn’t Brumer himself (he may be a bully but he isn’t that stupid).  But this genius clearly is a devout follower of Brumer and his blog since he gives the impression that he speaks in Brumer’s name and offers a link to that font of Jewish blogging wisdom.

Unfortunately, no one in either the federation or Kline Galland Home leadership seems concerned enough about this to rein Brumer in. Which says a great deal about the quality of local leadership and its willingness to turn a blind eye to such bizarre behavior.

Mary Robinson Wins Medal of Freedom

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009
Human rights campaigner, Mary Robinson, wins Presidential Medal of Freedom (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

Human rights campaigner, Mary Robinson, wins Presidential Medal of Freedom (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

I’m delighted to report that Pres. Obama has honored international human rights campaigner Mary Robinson with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. There was a campaign waged by the pro-Israel lobby to derail her nomination calling her anti-Israel and other scurrilous, unfounded epithets. But the president stayed true to his convictions and honored her along with 15 other deserving recipients including Sidney Poitier, Desmond Tutu, Steven Hawking, Sandra Day O’Connor, Harvey Milk (posthumously) and Ted Kennedy.

The Irish Times wrote about Robinson’s honor:

US PRESIDENT Barack Obama has hailed former president Mary Robinson as “an advocate for the hungry and the hunted, the forgotten and the ignored” who is showing the way to a better future for the world.

Presenting Mrs Robinson with the Medal of Freedom, the highest US civilian honour, Mr Obama suggested that her family background may have helped to prepare her for life as a civil rights campaigner.

“The only girl in a family of four brothers, Mary Robinson learned early on what it takes to make sure all voices are heard. As a crusader for women and those without a voice in Ireland, Mary Robinson was the first woman elected President of Ireland, before being appointed UN High Commissioner for Human Rights,” he said.

“When she travelled abroad as president, she would place a light in her window that would draw people of Irish descent to pass by below. Today, as an advocate for the hungry and the hunted, the forgotten and the ignored, Mary Robinson has not only shone a light on human suffering, but illuminated a better future for our world.”

Her award citation read:

“For Mary Robinson, the fight to end discrimination and suffering is an urgent moral imperative. She has been a trail-blazing crusader for women’s rights in Ireland and a forceful advocate for equality and human rights around the world,” the citation said.

“Whether courageously visiting conflict-stricken regions, or working to inject concern for human rights into business and economic development, Mary Robinson continues this important work today, urging citizens and nations to make common cause for justice.”

Kol hakavod lach (“more power to you”), Mary Robinson.  I reported yesterday that seven Israeli human rights NGOs lauded Robinson’s career and her right to the award.  James Wolfensohn and Ruth Messinger joined in supporting her.

Among the reprobates who have hectored and fulminated about her award are such moral luminaries as John Bolton, Gerald Steinberg, Abe Foxman, Mort Klein, the Republican Jewish Coalition, Elliot Engel and 45 Republican members of Congress.  A veritable rogues’ gallery of the Jewish right.  With naysayers like this, you know you’re right.  When any one of them has done 1/100th of what Robinson has done on behalf of the world’s poor and displaced then they can begin to talk.  Till then, they oughta give it a rest.

Correction: Rupa Shah notes that I erroneously credited Robinson with oversight of UNWRA as part of her responsibilities as UNHCR high commissioner.  But the two are entirely separate agencies.

Israel Shuns Syrian Negotiations

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009
Lieberman emcapo di tutti/em Danny Ayalon (Yisralel Beiteinu)

Lieberman capo di tutti Danny Ayalon (Yisrael Beiteinu)

The Netanyahu government has done a total about face from the previous Olmert government and not only rejected the idea of Turkish mediation in Syria-Israel peace negotiations; it has blamed Syria for the so-called failure of the previous rounds of talks.  Thus Israel has shut the door on the possibility of a Syrian peace process.  What is especially and bitterly ironic about all this is you now have a complete turnaround in attitude on the part of Israel and the U.S.  Previously, the Bush administration was adamantly opposed to a Syria-Israel peace track but Olmert pursued it anyway (half-heartedly, but he pursued it).  Now you have an Obama administration very interested in prying Syria from Iran’s orbit and normalizing relations with the former nation with Israel balking.

Here is yet another example of the gathering storm in U.S.-Israel relations not just over a settlement freeze, but over the very idea of making peace with any Arab entity whether it be Palestine, Syria or whomever.

In the foreign ministry statement on this matter, Danny Ayalon made the typically stupid claim that because Syria was the culprit in the “failure” of the mediated talks, the only way future talks could resume is if they were direct and unmediated.  How that would make a difference in Syria’s willingness to be forthcoming is a complete mystery.  Clearly, Ayalon knows that Syria prefers mediation and is less likely to be willing to talk directly to an intransigent Israeli government.  So in this instance Israel gets to blame Syria AND heads off the chance of any substantive negotiations with that country’s leadership that might lead to the unthinkable (for an Israeli nationalist) possibility of Israel actually returning conquered territory to an Arab state and thereby gaining peace.

Barghouti Ousts Old Guard in Fatah Leadership Vote

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009
Marwan Barghouti wins senior leadership role in Fatah

Marwan Barghouti wins senior leadership role in Fatah

Marwan Barghouti and his fellow Young Guard have beaten the Old Guard decisively in a vote for positions on the Fatah executive committee. Barghouti, in an Israeli prison for allegedly directing terror attacks against Israelis, and his cohort won 13 of 18 positions and half the Old Guard candidates lost. Most prominent among them was Ahmed Qureia, who saw himself as heir apparent to Mahmoud Abbas.

Barghouti’s new role places him in a strong position to assume leadership of Fatah if Abbas falters or retires. That, of course, would require the Israelis to release him from prison. Many Israeli politicians have urged this prospect, among them today Avishay Braverman, a minister in the Israeli government. Given the rightist complexion of the current government that seems unlikely.

If the Israeli government really does believe that Fatah is its last best hope for a real peace partner, then releasing Barghouti is almost a necessity since there are no other leadership candidates who enjoy overwhelming support as he does. As long as it keeps him in prison, analysts and observers of the conflict may justifiably maintain that Israel talks a good game (and little more than that) when it says it supports Fatah.

Israeli Human Rights NGOs Endorse Mary Robinson for Medal of Freedom

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

The Obama administration recently announced it would award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Mary Robinson for their work on behalf of human rights. Tutu was one of the spiritual leaders of the anti-apartheid movement and has also opposes the Israeli Occupation. Mary Robinson, though lesser known, is a former Irish president and UN High Commissioner for Refugees. Part of her latter role was to operate UNWRA, the major Gaza agency aiding the tens of thousands of refugees there.

Though pro-Israel advocates like Mort Klein and Abe Foxman equally detest Tutu and Robinson, perhaps as a Nobel laureate they felt the former’s position was less assailable. Robinson however has no such protection. Therefore, they’ve gone after her hammer and tong.  And the pro-Israel necons have joined in: John Bolton wrote the usual detritus in today’s Wall Street Journal attacking her not only for being anti-Israel, but for being anti-American, which is rather remarkable considering that she now lives and works in New York City.  Here is one of the proofs that Bolton adduces for her anti-Americanism:

In particular, she objected to the Bush administration’s “war paradigm” for dealing with terrorism, saying we actually “need to reinforce the criminal justice system.”

Yes, it certainly is pro-American to argue that the only way of dealing with acts of terror is waging merciless war  And it certainly is anti-American to advocate arresting and prosecuting those guilty of plotting violence against this country..

As in the Chas. Freeman affair, there are many other considerations contributing to the storm over Robinson’s award. First, the pro-Israel advocacy community is tremendously exercised by Obama’s alleged hard-nosed position toward Israel. Raising a ruckus over Robinson, they hope, takes the president off his game and derails his policy goals. The administration’s current attempt to engineer a settlement freeze can only be damaged if pro-Israel groups can stir up a full-fledged scandal. So far, in this case they haven’t dragged out any supposedly embarrassing quotations from Robinson, though Lord knows they’ve tried.

Into the breach sail seven courageous Israeli human rights NGOs (among them Yesh Din, B’Tselem, Gisha, Association for Civil Rights in Israel, and Physicians for Human Rights), who write to the president congratulating him for nominating the former UN official for her award. They write:

We…support your choice of Mrs. Mary Robinson to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom award. Mrs. Robinson deserves this
honor for a lifetime of unflagging support to the cause of human rights in its many dimensions.

We are greatly saddened by the media furor that has been generated by statements from AIPAC and the ADL, who have referred to Mrs. Robinson’s “long public record of hostility and one-sided bias against the Jewish state,” and “animus” towards Israel, respectively. These statements contain factual errors and are misleading…Such rhetoric distracts attention from the real issues that need to be addressed to foster peace and security for Israel and its neighbors.

…We…met with Mary Robinso…when she visited Israel in 2008 as head of a delegation of eminent women leaders. We saw firsthand her genuine commitment to human rights principles. During her 2008 visit, we understand that Mrs. Robinson met with a broad spectrum of Israelis including officials like Mayor of Sderot Eli Moyal, Israeli Supreme Court Chief Justice Dorit Beinisch, as well as members of the Peace and Security Council, a group of retired senior military officials who provide expert opinions on security matters, and with human rights activists.

We urge those who voice this unwarranted criticism to turn their attention to finding constructive solutions to the challenges that stand in the way of peace and acknowledge Mary Robinson – who has worked diligently for the promotion of human rights and conflict resolution – as the deserving recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Let everyone who reads of these attacks understand that they are the product of the pro-Israel lobby desperate to change the subject. For them, the news is all bad and anything they can do to change the subject gives Israel a welcome (for them) respite.

In their rush to demonize the Irish human rights advocate, the pro-Israel crowd should remember that Robinson is one of the world’s foremost proponents of women’s rights. Coincidentally, one wedge Israel is using in the propaganda war with the Arab states is their rather dismal record regarding gay and women’s rights. Israel supposedly is a veritable bastion of such rights. So let the Foxmans and Kleins remember that if they want to attack a women’s rights advocate they’re damaging their credibility when it comes to questioning these rights in the Arab world. Progressives will be only too happy to point out when they do so that the emperor’s wearing no clothes.

Aish HaTorah Erects Third Temple

Monday, August 10th, 2009


Yes, you read that headline right–almost.  Aish’s goal appears to be to hasten the birth pangs of the messiah, a new Middle East and Holy war. A hat tip to Rabbi Haim Beliak for pointing me to Linda Gradstein’s eye-opening radio story (mp3) (PRI’s The World) on Aish HaTorah’s dedication of a scale model of the Temple on the rooftop of its International Outreach Center just a stone’s through (literally and figuratively) from the Western Wall in Jerusalem. This is not just a papier mache “model.”  It took a year to build, weighs a ton, and contains the same gold, silver, and marble as the original.  It cost “a lot of money” to quote Gradstein.  In fact, Robert Zarnegin’s family (he was a Southern California real estate mogul) won the right to put his name on the Temple model with his single $360,000 gift (presumably there are others as well), which gives you an idea of how much “a lot” is.  This clearly is serious business and not just wishful thinking on the part of a few crazy messianists.

But in case you’re worried, Rabbi Ephraim Shore, Aish’s Israel director, wants to make clear (ahem, ahem) that the group is by no means advocating the erection of a Third Temple in Jerusalem.  Certainly not:

It’s true that in Judaism there is a concept that there will again be a Temple on this spot, but most religious authorities, and that’s…Aish HaTorah certainly goes into this…is that that’s God’s job to do.

Apparently, other Jews attending the model dedication didn’t get Shore’s memo. One woman said after the model was lifted into place by a construction crane:

What we just witnessed is just a little tiny taste of what’s to come. Hopefully, speedily and in our days…the real Temple come down from above just like that one did, standing right there where that gold shiny thing is [she points in the distance to the Muslim Dome of the Rock].

What she neglects to mention is that the real Temple would presumably have to supplant that “gold shiny thing,” a development that would not be welcomed by a few Muslims. Aish understands this is an issue fraught with tension and conflict and it would never contribute to such inter-religious hostility, now would it? In fact, Rabbi Shore invites Muslims to visit the Temple model which he apparently believes they’ll find spiritually uplifting:

We invite people of all religions, Jews, Christians, Muslims to come and visit and see this spot and learn more about the Temple that stood here. And we don’t really anticipate any controversy because after all the Temple, and Judaism and the Torah is part of the heritage of Christians and Muslims.

I have no doubt whatsoever that Muslims around the world will welcome the idea that a right-wing extremist Jewish group supporting the settler enterprise and fomenting hatred against Muslims and Barack Obama in the last election campaign, will welcome the Temple model as an expression of the peace-loving intentions of the Jewish people.

Gradstein also interviews a rabbi from the Temple Institute who has done all the research necessary into the vessels, ritual objects and ceremonies that will be needed for the rebuilt Temple. Ateret HaCohanim Yeshiva has trained rabbis who will become the priests for the Temple, God willing, when the time comes. They’ve got the whole thing worked out, I tell ya.

The only thing they don’t have worked out is the religious war that will ensue as soon as Muslims believe the Jews are crazy enough to bring this project to fruition. So thanks to Aish HaTorah for playing their constructive role in bringing that moment just a little bit closer to reality. When you think of Aish, think of Holy War, because that’s what these Jewish zealots are advocating whether they acknowledge it or not.

Let’s keep in mind this is the same Aish which created the Clarion Fund, which produced the two anti-Muslim films, Obsession and Third Jihad. The same group which distributed tens of thousands of DVDs of the former film to voters in swing states before the presidential election. How can anyone doubt that Aish’s intentions are anything but honorable and absolutely non-political in everything they do?

“We have no political intentions whatsoever,” he [Shore] said.

Just like they had no intention whatsoever of taking sides in the presidential election–except when the Third Jihad website compared the security policies of Obama and McCain and found guess whose wanting?? These are very slick, cool operators. They’re down and dirty and dangerous. And there will never be peace until they are exposed for all the Jewish world to see.

Dissenting Israeli Diplomat Reassigned to Siberia

Monday, August 10th, 2009
Mr. Consul General, we're transferring you from Boston to Siberia (Moshik/Maariv)

Mr. Consul General, we're transferring you from Boston to Siberia (Moshik/Maariv)

Sol Salbe sent me this funny cartoon about the imagined fate of Israeli consul general (Boston) Nadav Tamir, who wrote a leaked memo to the foreign ministry complaining that Netanyahu government provocations were driving a deep wedge between Israel and the U.S. If you imagine Lieberman offering Tamir a down jacket, snow boots, gloves and ski goggles, then it becomes even funnier.

As I wrote yesterday, Lieberman has already publicly asked for Tamir’s resignation so Tamir may not be long for the diplomatic corps. I have no doubt though that such an honest man can find honest work in another field (though I hope, as a major in the IDF, it isn’t in the Israeli military defense contracting business).

Prof. David Newman of Ben Gurion Univ. has published a terrific column in the Jerusalem Post (!) defending Tamir and laying out the salient policy issues:

The fact that Israel only continues to portray itself as the weak and threatened country, subject to continuous terror attacks and, more recently, a potential nuclear attack from Iran just doesn’t sell well when, at one and the same time, the government continues to undertake policies which negate many basic international standards of human rights for Palestinian civilians who are subject to its control.

Were Israel, as the strong power, to make real meaningful concessions on the issue of Palestinian statehood, the world would much more readily accept the very real security threats that the country faces and it would not be so antagonistic. But recent policies and statements by our leaders have sent a very different message to the world, and it is now our supporters and allies, not our enemies, who are criticizing us.

WHY SHOULD we be surprised when a worried diplomat sends a private letter back to his superiors in Jerusalem informing them of the damage being inflicted each and every time Netanyahu, Avigdor Lieberman or Uzi Arad are interviewed or make public statements?

No diplomat has a problem with representing Israel’s legitimate right to security and its right to defend itself against terror…But when the government undertakes dubious policies which harms Israel’s reputation even among its allies, it is not only legitimate, but the clear duty of the diplomat to warn his/her government of the damage which is being done to Israel’s cause.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE