Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for August, 2009

Dutch University Fires Ramadan for Hosting TV Show for Iran-Backed Network

Saturday, August 22nd, 2009
Tariq Ramadan, pawn in Dutch far-right anti-Muslim electioneering

Tariq Ramadan, pawn in Dutch far-right anti-Muslim electioneering (AP)

Here I thought that only the Bush administration ham-handedly overreacted to the alleged threat of Muslim militantcy by denying Tariq Ramadan a visa to teach at Notre Dame. Now, a Dutch university and city have engaged in the same type of ludicrous conduct in firing Tariq Ramadan from a teaching job at the school and from a job helping the city to encourage the intergration of Muslim residents into communal life. Ramadan’s offense: he conducts a TV show about Islam on the Iran-backed Press TV. Apparently, in doing so Ramadan has somehow become an apologist for “mad mullahs” who stole the recent presidential election:

The controversial Islamic theologian Tariq Ramadan has been fired from two jobs in the Netherlands for allegedly endorsing the Iranian regime by hosting a chat show on a Tehran-backed TV channel.

Mr Ramadan…has dismissed the decisions as “simplistic” and driven by the “Islamophobia” generated in Dutch politics by the populist campaigner Geert Wilders.

…The city of Rotterdam and the Erasmus University based in the city have jointly decided to dismiss him from his posts as community adviser and visiting lecturer on religion. This follows several days of heated debate in the Netherlands about Mr Ramadan’s position as a presenter of a political chat show on Press TV, a London-based, Iranian-backed satellite TV channel.

In a joint statement, the city and the university criticised Mr Ramadan for remaining host of Islam and Life despite the “hard-handed stifling” of opposition to the results of the July elections. They said that he had “failed sufficiently to realise the feelings that participation in this television program… might provoke in Rotterdam and beyond”.

This, of course is preposterous reasoning because Ramadan has specifically denounced the Iranian regime’s behavior in rigging the election.  His show too is a free-wheeling one which tackles all manner of issues related to Islam and by no means whitewashes either Islam in general or Iran in particular.

The Islamic scholar has struck out against his detractors and plans to take them to court.  He defends himself:

…Dismissing the allegations as driven by Dutch politics rather than a TV programme devoted to “critical debate” on Islam.”…It is as if I in particular, and Islam in general, were being used to promote certain political agendas in the upcoming Dutch elections. Geert Wilders, who wins votes while comparing the Koran to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, casts a long shadow.”

Mr Ramadan said that he had publicly criticised the repression of opposition in Iran and supported the country’s “long march… toward transparency and respect for human rights”.  His TV show was committed to “critical debate”. His guests had included “atheists, rabbis, priests, women with and without headscarves”. They had debated issues such as “freedom, reason, interfaith dialogue…and jihad…I challenge my critics to scrutinise these programmes and in them to find the slightest evidence of support for the Iranian regime.”

At least two people with divergent political views who I know and respect have been guests on Press TV: Dan Fleshler and Juan Cole.  [CORRECTION: Juan Cole has not been interviewed on Press TV, but Zbigniew Brzezinski, Norman Finkelstein and Noam Chomsky, among others, have.]  Does this mean that they too have drunk the Kool Aid and become raving defenders of the Iranian regime?  C’mon.  As I said above, this is ludicrous.  If a Muslim scholar were to host a regular show on Voice of America does this mean that he would be an American stooge and defender of every outrage perpetrated by this country against Muslims?

Apparently, Rotterdam’s mayor is Muslim and I’m guessing that this is an attempt by his political opponents to embarrass him.  In fact, this entire episode may be more about the mayor and Ramadan may only be a useful foil for the anti-Islamist right.

If he hasn’t already written about this, someone pick up the phone and tell Daniel Pipes that the Islamists have been vanquished at the dikes of the Zuider Zee just before their onslaught on all of European civilization.  Thank God some [Christian] God-fearing souls were willing to stand up against Trojan Horses like Ramadan, who sweet talk their way into the salons of the effete liberal-class, thus dissolving their will to hold the breach against the Mohammedan horde.

Yaalon Withdraws Claim Peace Now is a ‘Virus,’ Really Closer to Very Bad Flu

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

Ah how those Israeli cabinet ministers love to bob and weave after they sucker punch their politial opponents.  The latest is Bogie Yaalon who spoke publicly in honor of Moshe Feiglin, one of Israel’s top proto-fascist settler leaders.  He’s quoted by Haaretz as saying:

Yaron called “the elites” and Peace Now “a virus” and said that when he was in the army, he used to say that “the politicians brought the dove of peace and the army had to clean up after it.”

Well, it turns out Peace Now isn’t really a virus.  It’s actually closer to a really bad cold:

Ya’alon said that he “recognized the importance of democratic discourse and respecting other opinions.”

The Haaretz headline for its article, Vice Premier Retracts Peace Now as ‘Virus’ Jibe isn’t accurate (unless there is more in the original Hebrew version that would justify this claim).  Yaalon didn’t “retract” his jibe against the peace group.  He merely made a vague vacuous statement about what a swell thing democracy is.  That and a couple of shekels will buy him a cup of Turkish coffee.

Peres Tells Medvedev, Iranian Nukes are ‘Flying Death Camp’

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

I’d like to make a proposition: any politician, communal leader, or political partisan who abuses history with a fraudulent analogy should have to pay a fine of $1-million payable from the treasury of their own nation.  We could make the beneficiary some worthy UN agency like UNICEF or the High Commission for Refugees.  If we could persuade the world to accept this notion, then we would rid the world of some of the stupidest, weirdest, most noxious political posturing, and ease the suffering of those forced to read this narischkeit.

The latest example of the genre is from Shimon Peres, Israel’s near-nonagenarian president known to enjoy inordinately the sound of his own voice.  Israel’s president is in Russia attempting vainly to persuade the latter to join the coalition of those willing to destroy Iran’s nuclear capability.  If Peres can’t recruit Russia as an active participant, he at least wants Russia not to interfere in Israel’s plans to cut Iran down to a suitable size.  I say good luck to him.  I doubt very much Russia wants to see one of its better customers for military and nuclear technology bombed back to the Stone Age.

Here is my nomination for the first penalty for fraudulent historical analogy:

During their four-hour meeting, Peres and Medvedev discussed Iran’s nuclear program. Peres said, “A nuclear bomb in the hands of Iran means only one thing – a flying death camp.”

Thomas Harrington has penned a neat satirical piece, New Think-Tank Seeks to Regulate Historical Analogies, which is totally apt in this case.  In fact, I’d propose as an alternate to my above suggestion, that the new think tank offer a prize for worst historical analogy of the year and I’d make Peres the first nominee, though the competition for this award would be fierce.  There are just so many politicians who think it’s their duty to distort the historical record for partisan political gain.

I chortled a bit when I read the mission statement for the new Institute:

We therefore seek to aid those habitually engaged in generating historical reasoning (or reporting it to the general public after a cursory reading of a commissioned think-tank position paper) to channel their ideas toward only those parallelisms which affirm that the U.S. and its close ally Israel stand outside the laws of causality that have governed the fates of other peoples on the earth.”

Yaalon Looks to Fascist Right for Support in Likud Leadership Struggle

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

Bibi Netanyahu is facing no particular internal political threat (though he faces an external one in the shape of Barack Obama), yet his competitors for Likud party leadership are still jockeying for position.  Bogie Yaalon, former IDF chief of staff and current minister of strategic affairs, sees himself as a future prince of the Likud.  To become party leader, he apparently sees his best chance by allying himself with fascist right.  That’s why he spoke at an event this week honoring Moshe Feiglin, leader of the Manhigut Yehudit far right faction of the party.  In case you’re wondering where to place Feiglin on the political spectrum, think an amalgam of Geert Wilders, Meir Kahane, Jean Marie Le Pen and Jorge Haider:

Here is but a single statement out of many that I could offer:

“Hitler was an unparalleled military genius. Nazism promoted Germany from a low to a fantastic physical and ideological status. The ragged, trashy youth body turned into a neat and orderly part of society and Germany received an exemplary regime, a proper justice system and public order. Hitler savored good music. He would paint. This was no bunch of thugs. They merely used thugs and homosexuals.”

Feiglin’s views are so extreme that the British foreign office declared him persona non grata there, meaning he can’t fundraise among his fellow British Kahanists.

Here is a selection of Yaalon’s more offensive statements at the event:

“I, for one, am not afraid of the Americans,” Ya’alon said in the speech, which was reported by Channel 2′s Amit Segal. “I believe that Jews have the right to live anywhere in the land of Israel forever.”

In the speech, Ya’alon also denounced the power of the press and other “elites” in Israel to make or break politicians and lashed out at the extreme Left. He also called Peace Now “a virus.”

Feiglin praised Ya’alon at the rally and committed to him the support of Feiglin’s Manhigut Yehudit ideological forum in Likud, which has become increasingly powerful in the party’s institutions. That support could aid Ya’alon in an eventual run to lead the party.

Most observers of Israeli politics will not be surprised at any of this. Likud has long been the home of some of the most stridently nationalist politicians in the country. But it is still somewhat unusual for a Likud party leader to support overtly those who ardently espouse the political views of Meir Kahane.  After all, while he was alive the man was considered persona non grata and practically a Jewish terrorist by most of the nation.

This development indicates to me that had Kahane lived he would not be in jail, but rather a minister in the current government and a potential Likud party leader. Those who care about Israel must be alarmed by the alliances made by politicians such as Yaalon.  We are rapidly losing the Israel some of us once knew.  It is being replaced by a state lapsing into proto-fascism.

Not a Settlement Freeze, Just the Pause that Refreshes

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

An Israeli friend of this blog, Zvi Solow, sends this wonderful bit of Hebrew linguistic dexterity:

Hamtanah: this is the latest buzz word of the Bibi-Barak government. Under intense U.S. pressure re the settlements – [and] facing increasing contrary pressure from the ideological / populist members of his government (Bogy Yaalon, Eli Yishai, etc), the ”solution,” it turns out, is to declare – as Atias, the Shas minister for housing just did – that the government “of course” supports settlements in Eretz Israel; but just now, because of the delicate negotiations with the US…temporarily no building permits are issued. The government, says Atias – hasn’t decided – has vehalila – on a settlement freeze–as it upholds our “right” to settle in all of Eretz Israel–but now we are in a period of “hamtana” – waiting. For Godot ? The Messiah ? How convenient that Ivrit is so rich.

Hamtanah is apparently the ‘pause that refreshes.’  Political circumstances are not conducive to a continuing massive influx of Israeli settlers, so we take a break and wait for the opportune moment to resume our heavenly duty to repopulate the Holy Land.  My reply to Zvi was that I didn’t care what rationale Israelis used to justify a retreat on this issue as long as they got to accepting a freeze.  But I fear that, as in so many past Israeli statements on these issues, that this is all linguistic gamesmanship and signifies very little.  The hamtanah is a fig leaf, or a bone thrown to Obama to get him to think Israel accepts the freeze when it doesn’t.

It’s up to Obama to see through this and plow forward.

Tom DeLay to Join Cast of ‘Dancing With the Felons’

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

Well, not exactly.  You guessed it was Dancing with the Stars all along, right?  Yup, The Hammer is going to be trading in his implements of political suasion for some dancing shoes.  I’ve never watched the show that America seems entranced by.  But watching a washed up former Congressional leader on his way to trial on political corruption charges might turn me into a viewer.

Tom has made some interesting career choices: first he was an exterminator, then a Republican hit man, and now a washed up pol seeking to extend his shelf life.  I suppose I should be happy Tom’s on TV dancing up a storm rather than slashing Democrats, which was his last incarnation.

There were a few unintentionally humorous bits in the N.Y. Times’ TV critic’s report on this story:

It turns out Mr. DeLay “watches the show all the time,” Mr. Green [Dancing's producer] said. “He likes dancing with his wife, and his daughter is a professional country-and-western dancer.”

You mean line dancing can be a PROFESSION??  I suppose it’s a better and more honest one than being a corrupt, power-hungry politician who helped drive your Party into political oblivion.

One thing you’ve got to give Dancing though, at least this time they chose a recently washed up Republican politician.  Apparently, at one time they were scraping even lower in the barrel:

Mr. Green said the show had previously given serious thought to former Vice President Dan Quayle. He declined to say whether Mr. Quayle had been formally invited to participate.

Quayle couldn’t spell, could barely string together articulate sentences.  He was so wooden I can’t even imagine the man dancing.  You wonder what goes through the heads of these producers.

Given the above choices, this claim from the producer really broke the laughometer:

He…said the show wanted to steer clear of any partisan posturing. “We don’t want to get into that morass,” he said.

Posturing?  Who said hiring two of the most right-wing American politicians to grace the American political stage in the past 20 years was “partisan posturing?”  I guess this tells you a lot about what their audience demographic is, huh?  But not to worry, the producer’s dream booking is Bill Clinton.  It makes perfect sense in a totally weird way.  But they’ll have to wait until he becomes a true has-been like DeLay.  Right now, he’s still somebody especially thanks to Hillary’s role as secretary of state.

Israel Absolves Itself of Responsibility for Brain-Damaged American Peace Activist

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009
This is what an act of war looks like--to others it looks like cold-blooded murder

Tristan Anderson: one person's "act of war" is another's cold-blooded murder

If it weren’t so tragic, it would actually be entertaining to watch Israel work every possible legal and political angle to get its way in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The IDF, intelligence agencies, and military lawyers would put those of Kafka’s The Trial to shame. And they’ve worked their magic once again in the case of Tristan Anderson, American peace activist who was shot in the head at an anti-Separation Wall demonstration several months ago, suffering serious brain injury for which he is still hospitalized.

It simply would not do for Israel to accept any responsibility for assaulting and nearly killing an unarmed, non-violent protestor who posed no threat to Israeli personnel. As a matter of principle, Israel believes it must refuse comfort to its enemies, even if Israel itself has inflicted the suffering. Thus we learn that the government has informed Anderson’s Israeli lawyers that he was shot under an “act of war.” This seems to be the equivalent in insurance lingo of an “act of God.” In other words, in the midst of war all sins are excused and no one is responsible no matter how heinous the act. Just witness the IDF’s approach to the Gaza war. Plenty of incidents verging on war crimes but somehow the army comes out smelling like a rose: it was an act of war, don’t you know.

The idea that an Israeli army facing a melange of Palestinian and international demonstrators armed with nothing more than the shirts on their backs and the sounds of their own voice constitutes an act of war is an insult to the world’s intelligence. Yes, some demonstrators at Bilin do throw rocks at heavily armed IDF soldiers who have rarely endured so much as a scratch. But Tristan Anderson was not one of these and there was absolutely no violence in the area when he was attacked.


Further, after B’Tselem admonished the IDF and insisted it direct its forces NOT to fire high velocity tear gas canisters at demonstrators’ bodies (heads, actually) as is its custom, no action has been taken. This would be the equivalent in a civil action where a defendant not only causes injury to the plaintiff but refuses to correct the dangerous condition that caused the injury. Any lawyer fresh out of law school could tell you that’s a recipe for a major financial penalty.

Israel has already agreed to pay the filmmaker James Miller’s family a $2.2-million settlement after the British attorney general threatened legal action against the government if it didn’t take heed. I expect the same thing will happen in this case, especially if the U.S. government acts as boldly as the Brits did (and they should). And I say more power to the Anderson family. If Israel can’t be made to see reason through moral suasion then stick it to them in the pocketbook. Enough of these settlements and maybe a few Israelis will begin to wonder why maintaining the Occupation is so costly. Whatever it takes.

Uphold Our Heritage: Jobs’ Jackling House Agreement Sweetheart Deal

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

Recently, Steve Jobs reached an agreement with the town of Woodside supposedly to preserve the California historic landmark Jackling House.  Prior to this, the historic preservation group, Uphold Our Heritage, had battled with Jobs over his plan to demolish the home and replace it with a new home.  The group had prevailed in Superior Court in its attempt to force Jobs to preserve the home under requirements of California law.

There’s only one problem with media reports about the deal: they’re wrong.  Yes, there was a deal–but only between two of the three parties involved.  Uphold Our Heritage was not party to the deal and in fact filed papers with the Court to oppose it last week.  The proposed deal does not guarantee the preservation of Jackling House.  It merely requires that Gordon Smythe, the prospective new owner, dismantle the House, put it in storage and seek an alternate location for it.  If he does not find one within five years the House becomes the property of the Town.  Smythe does not yet have a suitable location for the House nor does he have financing to buy such property.  It’s basically a sweetheart deal that allows Jobs to pay a paltry $600,000 for taking the House down.  Then it’s entirely off his hands and he gets to build the latest Apple McMansion in its stead.

A Court hearing is scheduled for September at which the judge who ruled in favor of preservation the first time will hear UOH’s arguments against the deal.  If she decides not to accept the deal Jobs negotiated, then Jobs will continue his fight to get the California Court of Appeals review the lower court ruling.  This could take years.  In fact, Jobs may be retired or even dead before the case is resolved.  But one thing is for sure, Steve Jobs, one of the most stubborn, obtuse and monomaniacal figures in modern American corporate life, will never back down or compromise in any meaningful way.  This House will be preserved in its current location over his dead body.

I note that a flagship Apple store being built in Melboure, Australia will force the demolition of that city’s finest art deco landmark, Lonsdale House:

One of Melbourne’s finest examples of art deco architecture from the 1930s looks set to be knocked down to make way for an iconic new Apple Store. Lonsdale House, on Lonsdale Street near Caledonian Lane, will be bulldozed…

Robin Grow, president of the Art Deco & Modernism Society, vehemently opposes the development…[and] said Lonsdale House needed to be saved to preserve Melbourne’s cultural heritage.Grow, and other supporters of the “Save Lonsdale House” campaign, said the only reason Lonsdale House was being knocked down as part of the Myer redevelopment was to make the lane wider for trucks.

The entire debacle is eerily similar to another Apple-related heritage battle that has been waging for eight years over company founder Steve Jobs’s plans to knock down a historic 14-bedroom Californian mansion.

Steve Jobs may be a marketing/technology genius.  But like many of the robber barons of old he is a cultural barbarian.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE