But what about Dennis Ross working for a Jewish group affiliated with the Israeli government? If Freeman poses a problem so should Ross. But Ross, you see, is kosher & Freeman is treif.

It’s say it’s Mike P. who’s an enemy of the people and of the good.

And when one of those countries is Saudi Arabia, that’s about as traitorous as one can get.

Good riddance to an enemy of the people.

No the other person commenting is Grant F. Smith.
I doubt there is a more biased observer. His whole life is devoted to getting the likes of Steve Rosen.
Smith’s argument: “it would probably advantage the prosecution to show how AIPAC acquired and used NDI and commercial information in the past.” Is just plain stupid. Aipac is not on trial.
With Leonard, who has 30 years of government experience determining what is classified testifying for the defense, it’s pretty much over.

If the “experts’ are right the AIPAC case is almost over

You mean the “experts” like Malcolm Hoenlein & Mort Klein? Actually, you’ve linked to a post by Steve Aftergood who I know personally. Steve has an axe to grind in this case as a anti-nuclear activist who has championed the use of government information in order to advance the cause of nuclear disarmament. Because of this Steve MUST argue that Rosen & Weissman are not guilty. If he takes any other position he would be betraying all his previous work.

So Steve is not a disinterested observer & his view of the case is highly skewed. If you read the comments in the thread you’d note that not everyone even at the FAS site agrees with Steve’s analysis.

I wouldn’t count my chickens if I were you. Steve Rosen, Doug Feith, Wolfowitz if they aren’t spies are so useful to Israel they might as well be. And notice I didn’t say they WEREN’T.

Accused doesn’t mean guilty. If the “experts’ are right the AIPAC case is almost over with a full acquittal in store for Rosen.
http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/02/aipac_case-2.html