Comments on: Anti-Muslim Film Produced by Pro-Israel Partisan Boosts McCain

By: NYT’s Bronner To Speak At Clarion Fund Iranophobic Event - OpEd

NYT’s Bronner To Speak At Clarion Fund Iranophobic Event - OpEd — Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:20:26 +0000

[...] Clifton reports that the NY Times’ Ethan Bronner will speak at a panel discussion hosted by the Clarion Fund on November 7th at the 92nd Street Y in New York. It will mark the premier of the latest Clarion [...]

By: Voices without Votes » A Global Review of the U.S. Election

Voices without Votes » A Global Review of the U.S. Election — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:34:14 +0000

[...] Silverstein at Tikun Olam covers the controversy of what he calls “the right-wing, pro-Israel crowd” distributing [...]

By: Who’s Behind ‘Obsession’? « Back Towards The Locus

Who’s Behind ‘Obsession’? « Back Towards The Locus — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:34:53 +0000

[...] is an employee of Aish HaTorah, an organisation that “is dedicated to revitalizing the Jewish people by [...]

By: Richard Silverstein

Richard Silverstein — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:10:35 +0000

@Christopher: I don’t believe LEHI proposed actually fighting on the side of the Nazis. They were primarily interested in fighting against the British if the Nazis would guarantee to allow for a Jewish state in the event that Germany won the war. They would in effect have become Nazi allies w/o out actually physically fighting alongside them. At least that’s my understanding.

By: Christopher

Christopher — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:16:37 +0000

During WW2, the Israeli Jewish terrorist group LEHI proposed fighting on the side of Nazi Germany. One of its leaders, Yitzhak Shamir, went on to become prime minister of Israel.

By: Richard Silverstein

Richard Silverstein — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:05:39 +0000

@Edward: Do you think that the only thing that a writer has to do all day is Google to find out which crazies have exploited or stolen their work to further their own poisoned agenda???

You set the rules for your own blog. I set the rules for mine. If you don’t like my rules set up yr own somewhere else. I don’t run this blog for your benefit or to satisfy yr sense of fairness.

By: Edward

Edward — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:35:55 +0000

@Richard, Karin Friedemann has the same ability to find her article prominently featured on the nazi/klan david duke website as anyone else. It’s called Google.

In her earlier message Karin Friedemann posted a link to a Google hosted video entitled “Zionist War Crimes”.

You post the disclaimer “I have absolutely no interest in, nor sympathy for the film she’s recommending”.

Will you also permit a link to the YouTube hosted video of “Obsession” as you do to Karins recommended video?

You can post the same disclaimer for “Obsession” as you did for “Zionist War Crimes”.

By: Richard Silverstein

Richard Silverstein — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:09:56 +0000

@Edward:

Karin Friedemann shares views with david duke.

Or so you would have us believe. David Duke tried to post one of my Comment is Free pieces on his website. I don’t share a single belief in common w. him. So there goes yr theory that sharing a website w. him means I agree w. him. David Duke has an agenda. He wants to show Jews & others that there are other Jews who think as he does. What David Duke thinks or believes has no relevance to anything or anyone except himself & his followers. Those like you who make a mountain out of this molehill are being histrionic.

The only way you will know whether Friedemann “permits her article to be posted on dukes [sic] website” is by asking her. I requested he take my article down. He refused. How do you know she hasn’t done the same thing. I had to threaten him with a lawsuit before he removed my article. Maybe she doesn’t know about the article. Maybe she doesn’t know enough about copyright law as I do. WHo knows what the reason is. Yet you, in yr infinite wisdom believe you know the reason. Because you’re just so damn smart, aren’t you??