Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Bush Praises His ‘Multilateralism,’ Claims Historians Can’t Judge Him Objectively

Jun 18th, 2008 by Richard Silverstein | 3

Mr. Bush…told reporters at a press conference with Mr. [Gordon] Brown that “one of the things that I will leave behind is a multilateralism to deal with tyrants, so problems can be solved diplomatically.”

New York Times

It’s statements like this that will force me to create a new “Say What?” category for this blog. The guy’s clearly starting to believe his own rancid PR. “Multilateralism?” Solving problems through diplomacy? Is he kidding?  What problem has he ever solved through diplomacy?

Or maybe he’s been reading Obama’s speeches and thinks they have a nice ring to them. So he’ll steal some of Barack’s thunder. But whatever Bush is smoking, he ought to give it up and face facts.

It’s also interesting to note that Bush has essentially conceded he will not be viewed favorably by historians. But he dismisses this by noting “there’s no such thing as objective short-term history.” In other words, all those judging him will be hopelessly biased. Only those who judge him say, in about 1,000 years will possibly have enough distance to truly appreciate the gifts he bore western civilization.

Bush is starting to remind me of Orson Welles’ doddering Citizen Kane looking back in his dotage with deluded fondness over his wretched past.

3 Comments on “Bush Praises His ‘Multilateralism,’ Claims Historians Can’t Judge Him Objectively”


  1. Dan Sniderman said:

    No surprises here. Of course, I hope Obama is elected as are more Democratic Congressmen and women who won’t be timid with investigations. For the short-term - I”m more intersted how the courts judge him than historians…


  2. Daga1 said:

    Bush never ceases to amaze me

    Such statements you can expect from a self anointed czar of former soviet republic Fara-way-istan or an African Jungle potentate, but an American president selected by US supreme court ? that’s hard to understand.-but it shows how deeply flawed your democratic system is
    His legacy is an isolated America. Not only has he been unable to cooperate, He has been unwilling. Clearly demonstrated as he sidestepped the Senate and installed embattled nominee John Bolton as ambassador to the United Nations
    Creative people, like composers, painters and writers are best judged in posterity. Politicians by their contemporates. Maybe Woodrow Wilson is an exception..his plan at Versailles might have prevented Hitler’s raise to power.
    What can possibly happen in the future that vindicates Bush’ lies, illegal war, torture,moral and financial bankruptcy. What can absolve him from his crimes against humanity ?


  3. zhu bajie said:

    Somehow, I don’t think the millenia will improve GWB’s reputation. It hasn’t worked for Nero or Elagabalus.

    Zhu Bajie

Leave a Reply

Tikun Olam-תקון עולם: Make the World a Better Place is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!