<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Israeli Talks With Syria Concede Failure of Lebanon Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/</link>
	<description>Essays on politics, culture and ideas about Israeli-Arab peace and world music</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Silverstein</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/#comment-100530</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Silverstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 05:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/?p=3129#comment-100530</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Bill Pearlman:&lt;/p&gt;
I didn't make up the idea nor get it straight from Assad.  I read it in the MSM.  If you weren't so snarky so often I'd actually do the work to find the reference for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill Pearlman:</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t make up the idea nor get it straight from Assad.  I read it in the MSM.  If you weren&#8217;t so snarky so often I&#8217;d actually do the work to find the reference for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amir</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/#comment-100498</link>
		<dc:creator>amir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/?p=3129#comment-100498</guid>
		<description>Bill, Syria wanted the US to think it had a WMD program because that kind of disinformation worked out so well for Saddam Hussein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, Syria wanted the US to think it had a WMD program because that kind of disinformation worked out so well for Saddam Hussein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Pearlman</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/#comment-100488</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Pearlman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 14:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/?p=3129#comment-100488</guid>
		<description>And how do you know that the Syrian effort was a sham. Are you in touch with Assad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how do you know that the Syrian effort was a sham. Are you in touch with Assad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Silverstein</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/#comment-100465</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Silverstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/?p=3129#comment-100465</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@amir:&lt;/p&gt;
No, you misunderstood what I said.  Syria never intended to create a nuclear weapon.  It wanted to APPEAR as if it was doing so.  To go through the motions to make the U.S. &#038; Israel THINK it was creating such a program so it could give them pause to consider that it would be better to negotiate than consider a Syria that went nuclear.

At best, Israel prob. bombed an installation that was a nuclear Potemkin Village.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@amir:</p>
<p>No, you misunderstood what I said.  Syria never intended to create a nuclear weapon.  It wanted to APPEAR as if it was doing so.  To go through the motions to make the U.S. &#038; Israel THINK it was creating such a program so it could give them pause to consider that it would be better to negotiate than consider a Syria that went nuclear.</p>
<p>At best, Israel prob. bombed an installation that was a nuclear Potemkin Village.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amir</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/#comment-100449</link>
		<dc:creator>amir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/?p=3129#comment-100449</guid>
		<description>RS: "It is far more likely that Assad used the nuclear installation as N. Korea did–as a bargaining chip"

So if this true, by blowing up the installation Israel weakened Syria's bargaining position, which is what I said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RS: &#8220;It is far more likely that Assad used the nuclear installation as N. Korea did–as a bargaining chip&#8221;</p>
<p>So if this true, by blowing up the installation Israel weakened Syria&#8217;s bargaining position, which is what I said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Silverstein</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/#comment-100443</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Silverstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/?p=3129#comment-100443</guid>
		<description>@Bani: &lt;p&gt;
You may think a dirty bomb is a possibility but it is at best a distant possibility.  The complexity of building a nuclear weapon is not an 'assumption' it is a reality.  If were merely an untested assumption then Iran would have one already.  Look how long it took India, Pakistan, N. Korea &#038; any number of other nuclear powers to achieve their capability.  And what particular expertise do you have that nuclear experts--who've weighed in on this subject &#038; disagreed w. you--don't have??

It is far more likely that Assad used the nuclear installation as N. Korea did--as a bargaining chip &#038; that it never really intended to seriously pursue nuclear technology.  Assad built the facility to pressure Israel &#038; the U.S. into realizing if they didn't bargain w. him that he could pursue the N. Korea route &#038; go nuclear.  This theory has been published in the MSM &#038; I think it's highly credible.

"A year or 2 at most???!"  What planet are you on?  Iran would have the bomb if that were the case.  Or are Iranian scientists less capable than Japanese, Argentinian, Swiss?

Bombing the Syrian installation wasn't a 'service to humanity.'  It was service to Ehud Olmert &#038; the IDF's popularity ratings which had taken a severe beating in the past 2 yrs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bani:
<p>
You may think a dirty bomb is a possibility but it is at best a distant possibility.  The complexity of building a nuclear weapon is not an &#8216;assumption&#8217; it is a reality.  If were merely an untested assumption then Iran would have one already.  Look how long it took India, Pakistan, N. Korea &#038; any number of other nuclear powers to achieve their capability.  And what particular expertise do you have that nuclear experts&#8211;who&#8217;ve weighed in on this subject &#038; disagreed w. you&#8211;don&#8217;t have??</p>
<p>It is far more likely that Assad used the nuclear installation as N. Korea did&#8211;as a bargaining chip &#038; that it never really intended to seriously pursue nuclear technology.  Assad built the facility to pressure Israel &#038; the U.S. into realizing if they didn&#8217;t bargain w. him that he could pursue the N. Korea route &#038; go nuclear.  This theory has been published in the MSM &#038; I think it&#8217;s highly credible.</p>
<p>&#8220;A year or 2 at most???!&#8221;  What planet are you on?  Iran would have the bomb if that were the case.  Or are Iranian scientists less capable than Japanese, Argentinian, Swiss?</p>
<p>Bombing the Syrian installation wasn&#8217;t a &#8217;service to humanity.&#8217;  It was service to Ehud Olmert &#038; the IDF&#8217;s popularity ratings which had taken a severe beating in the past 2 yrs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Silverstein</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/#comment-100440</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Silverstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/?p=3129#comment-100440</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@amir:&lt;/p&gt;
Not at all.  You seem to be forgetting that Israel actually occupied sovereign Lebanese land for 18 yrs. &#038; before that assassinated Palestinian leaders in Beirut almost at will.  Not to mention Shebaa Farms which Israel concedes it has no claim to but so far refuses to return to Lebanon or Syria (one of which actually HAS sovereignty depending on who you ask).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@amir:</p>
<p>Not at all.  You seem to be forgetting that Israel actually occupied sovereign Lebanese land for 18 yrs. &#038; before that assassinated Palestinian leaders in Beirut almost at will.  Not to mention Shebaa Farms which Israel concedes it has no claim to but so far refuses to return to Lebanon or Syria (one of which actually HAS sovereignty depending on who you ask).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bani</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/#comment-100434</link>
		<dc:creator>Bani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/?p=3129#comment-100434</guid>
		<description>Technical Observation
Every body assumes after Hirosh. and Nagasak. that an atomic bomb is the only form of
NWMD. A dirty bombs into the sea of Galili or several + some dirty suicide bombers in TA
and Jerusalem is always a possibiliy. The scond assumption about complexity and materials etc. is an assumption. Sorry but El-baradi or what is his name is totally useless or on the pay. Also this week Russia and China announced nuclear coop. Also North Korea could have used Syria to store and play with all kinds of nuclear technologies.
Today a country like Japan, Germany, Switzerland and Argentina can produce Atomic bonb in about a year or two at the most.  Bombing this place is Syria was a service to humanity any way you put it. Just to identify my self the Jewes in El-Halil should be bulldozered out totally now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technical Observation<br />
Every body assumes after Hirosh. and Nagasak. that an atomic bomb is the only form of<br />
NWMD. A dirty bombs into the sea of Galili or several + some dirty suicide bombers in TA<br />
and Jerusalem is always a possibiliy. The scond assumption about complexity and materials etc. is an assumption. Sorry but El-baradi or what is his name is totally useless or on the pay. Also this week Russia and China announced nuclear coop. Also North Korea could have used Syria to store and play with all kinds of nuclear technologies.<br />
Today a country like Japan, Germany, Switzerland and Argentina can produce Atomic bonb in about a year or two at the most.  Bombing this place is Syria was a service to humanity any way you put it. Just to identify my self the Jewes in El-Halil should be bulldozered out totally now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Pearlman</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/#comment-100432</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Pearlman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/?p=3129#comment-100432</guid>
		<description>You have got to be kidding. Syria is an Iranian proxy in all but name. Assad himself is a weak leader and a member of a minority sect. And you think that Israel should sit on its ass and wait until it has the bomb. The only reason Olmert is doing this is to divert attention from his legal troubles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have got to be kidding. Syria is an Iranian proxy in all but name. Assad himself is a weak leader and a member of a minority sect. And you think that Israel should sit on its ass and wait until it has the bomb. The only reason Olmert is doing this is to divert attention from his legal troubles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amir</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/05/22/israeli-talks-with-syria-concede-failure-of-lebanon-policy/#comment-100418</link>
		<dc:creator>amir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 09:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/?p=3129#comment-100418</guid>
		<description>Your confusing the goose for the gander. Israel's sovereignty is violated constantly by Syrias proxys/allies Hamas and Hizballah (Hizballah before the war).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your confusing the goose for the gander. Israel&#8217;s sovereignty is violated constantly by Syrias proxys/allies Hamas and Hizballah (Hizballah before the war).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
