Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for May, 2008

Avrum Burg’s Latest: ‘The Holocaust is Over’

Saturday, May 31st, 2008


About a year ago, there was a huge cultural/political dust-up in Israel over the Hebrew-language publication of his latest book in which he made a total break with Israeli Zionism. Considering that Burg is a scion of a distinguished Orthodox Zionist family, his radicalism scandalized almost everyone. Just one indication of how provocative Burg hoped his book would be can be found in his original (since abandoned) title, Hitler Won. Ever since reading about the book in Haaretz, I’ve awaited the English translation with bated breath. Now, reader Gene Schulman, living in Geneva, informs me that LeMonde Diplomatique has reviewed the English edition titled, The Holocaust Is Over; We Must Rise From its Ashes.

Here are some interesting passages from the review by Eric Rouleau, Judaism is Universal:

The views he expresses in his latest book The Holocaust Is Over: We Must Rise from Its Ashes (to be published by Macmillan in autumn 2008) are brutally frank. On the occupation of the Palestinian territories he writes: “For years I tempered my position to avoid a breach within Israeli society. I have now changed. Today I ask: are [all Jews] my brothers? My answer is no… Since the Shoah, I believe there is no such thing as genetic Judaism, only Jewish values… Even if they are circumcised and respect the Sabbath and the Ten Commandments, the wicked occupiers are not my brothers.”

Throughout the book Burg contrasts the “Judaism of the ghetto”, whose racism he deplores, with “universal Judaism”, whose humanism he supports. He rejects the Old Testament notion that the Jews are God’s chosen people, as that amounts to a claim of racial superiority.

…Burg accuses Zionist leaders of having appropriated the Shoah – a tragedy not only for the Jews but all humanity – for often shameful ends. He takes issue with the fact they have turned it into an essential part of Jewish identity, which they’ve thereby reduced to a litany of past persecutions. In Burg’s view, this distorts Jewish history and conceals centuries of peace and good relations with other peoples.

…Burg is against the use of the word Shoah (catastrophe) for the Holocaust, since it gives it a unique character, beyond comparison with other genocides. This exclusivity, he believes, undermines compassion and solidarity with non-Jewish victims. It also feeds the paranoia that anti-semitism is a universal, timeless phenomenon: “The whole world is in league against the Jews.”

Zionist leaders have made use of the Holocaust in a variety of ways. It can be used as emotional blackmail to bring both political and financial advantage. Or serve as a reminder to the Germans of their criminal guilt and to the Americans and Europeans that they looked the other way while the Jews suffered at the hands of the Nazis. The Israeli authorities thereby guarantee themselves impunity, whatever their violations of international law and human rights, and whatever war crimes they carry out, such as targeted executions of Palestinians.

Burg takes issue with Israeli scholars who ignore all genocides but those suffered by the Jews, and with laws which punish only crimes against Jews. He opposes Jewish immigrants being automatically granted Israeli citizenship on religious and genetic grounds. A committed secularist, he has also criticised the “religious fundamentalists” who show contempt for national sovereignty. Noting that his country often picks its leaders from members of the military or the secret services, he has warned that “the nightmare of a state run by rabbis and generals is not impossible”.

…Burg does not consider himself anti-Zionist, except when the principles of Herzl and the values of the declaration of independence are betrayed. That is what happens when Israel is transformed into a “colonial state run by an immoral clique of corrupt outlaws”, as he put it in his Yedioth Aharonoth interview. In the same article he went on: “The end of Zionism is nigh… A Jewish state may endure, but it will be a state of a different sort, dreadful and alien to our values.”

Such views unsurprisingly provoked an outcry in Israel. But they also drew enthusiastic support from those Israelis who are eager to see root and branch reform of their country. Avraham Burg, who is in his early 50s, can hope that his dream may one day become reality. And, like the wave of iconoclasts in the Israeli intelligentsia who have absorbed the work of the new historians, he is living proof that his society is undergoing profound change.

Unfortunately, we’ll have to wait till October 28, 2008 to read it.

Sharansky Coming to Seattle to Flog New Book

Friday, May 30th, 2008
Bush awards Sharansky Medal of Freedom for life of “courage and conviction” [gag] (Eric Draper)

I just noticed that the inimitable, indomitable Natan Sharansky, protege of our beloved president, will be speaking this summer at Seattle’s Town Hall, which undoubtedly means to my readers “coming soon to a theater near you.” And if any of you can figure out what the gobbledy-gook below actually means, you’ll win a prize of a week’s stay at the glorious Shalem Center or the American Enterprise Institute, whichever you prefer. I really like the phrase “valueless cosmopolitanism.” It has a nice ring to it, don’t you think? Maybe it’s something like that other Godless phenomenon “secular humanism?”

Wednesday, July 16 at 7:30 pm

Natan Sharansky: ‘Defending Identity’

Who is better prepared to confront challenges and defend principles in a volatile modern world? Those with strong national, religious, ethnic, or tribal identities who accept democracy; or democrats who renounce identity as a kind of divisive prejudice? The author of the bestselling The Case for Democracy, Natan Sharansky builds on his personal experience as a dissident, arguing that valueless cosmopolitanism, even in democracies, is dangerous. In Defending Identity: Its Indispensable Role in Protecting Democracy, he argues that it is better to have hostile identities framed by democracy than democrats indifferent to identity. Presented by the Town Hall Center for Civic Life, with University Book Store.

Do you think Natan is willing to ‘defend’ Palestinian identity or democracy?

Rice Silent on Finkelstein Deporation, Livid at Israeli Refusal to Allow Palestinian Fulbright Scholars to Study in U.S.

Friday, May 30th, 2008

The N.Y. Times has embarrassed Condi Rice into getting Israel off its ass to allow seven Gazan Fulbright winners to leave and pursue their studies in the U.S.:

The United States pressed Israel on Friday to let seven Gaza Strip Palestinians travel to the United States to study on coveted U.S. government Fulbright fellowships and Israel said it was working on the issue.

…The U.S. State Department this week told the seven that their Fulbright grants had been withdrawn and it has taken steps to be able to direct the money to other Palestinians in the West Bank because of the trouble getting the exit visas from Gaza.

However, after The New York Times published a report on the issue on Friday, U.S. officials said they were redoubling their efforts to get the Israeli exit visas for the students.

Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns, the third-ranking U.S. diplomat, spoke to the Israeli ambassador to the United States on Friday to emphasize the U.S. desire to see the matter resolved, the State Department said.

“Frankly, a decision to let people that have been vetted for what is perhaps the most prestigious foreign educational program run by the United States … it ought to be falling off a log for them to be able to do this,” said U.S. State Department spokesman Tom Casey.

“I expect that we’ll have some positive outcome for this in the not-too-distant future,” he told reporters.

Until then, the IDF was content to prevent the children from leaving so they would lose their academic opportunity for this year. Until the Times embarrassed her, Condi didn’t seem to care enough to do anything. Amazing what a little bad PR can do to a government bureaucrat. She actually got up off her tush and did something.

Israel, of course, had no excuse for its disruption of the students’ lives. What, were they terror threats? Were they all Hamas activists who would polish their bomb-making skills while studying here?

Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Arye Mekel said, “We’re trying to get them out. Obviously the situation, with Hamas shooting at the border crossings, it is not such an easy thing to do.”

No, of course it’s a major security operation to get seven Gazan teenagers safely out of Gaza. It must require, say, an entire paratroop battalion.

What’s ironic of course is that Condi cares so much about these seven Palestinian students, but couldn’t care less that Israel violated its democratic principles in imprisoning and deporting Norman Finkelstein because they don’t like him criticizing them in the world community. I’m pleased that she cares about Palestinian children, but caring a bit more for her own U.S. citizens and violations of their right to travel to the Occupied Territories would be nice (not to mention Palestinian-Americans routinely deported merely for wishing to visit their families in the Occupied Territories).

M.J. Rosenberg Supports Finkelstein Deportation

Friday, May 30th, 2008

In my recent Comment is Free column, Shut Out of the Homeland, I implicitly criticized some Jewish progressives for supporting Israel’s decision to deport Norman Finkelstein last week because of his criticisms of Israeli policy. I didn’t name names because these individuals stated their views in a semi-public e mail exchange and I didn’t feel it was right to do so.

Now, Murray Polner informs me that one of them, M.J. Rosenberg has written publicly about his views and I can criticize them explicitly. Though M.J. was far more dismissive and vituperative in the e mail thread than he is publicly, I’ll confine myself to quoting what he’s written:

This column is written in grays, not in black and white. So, while I’m at it, I want to comment on the Israeli government’s decision not to permit Norman Finkelstein, a virulently anti-Israel American Jewish professor, to enter the country. Finkelstein was arrested at the airport and questioned by the Shin Bet security service for several hours on Friday. He was then expelled and told he could not return for ten years. This has become a big issue on the web and has occasioned much criticism of Israel.

Finkelstein is stridently anti-Israel and literally cheers on its enemies. During the 2006 Israeli war with Hezbollah, he addressed a rally in New York to express solidarity with Hassan Nasrallah and to say, “right now, we are all Hezbollah.” This past January, Finkelstein went on Lebanese television to chide his hosts for opposing the destruction Hezbollah helped bring on their country.

Read his words. This is an American Jew, who lives in the comfort of the United States, going on Lebanese television to criticize anti-Hezbollah Lebanese for their reluctance to die in the struggle against Israel!

…I often criticize arm-chair right-wing warriors here who are always ready to fight to the last Israeli. Finkelstein will fight to the last Israeli, Palestinian, Lebanese in his own perverse holy war.

Pretty incredible stuff.

Nonetheless, I don’t much like banning people because their ideas are noxious.

But if Israel does evict the likes of Finkelstein, let it also expel those right-wing fanatics who land at Ben-Gurion airport every day, are welcomed at passport control, and go off to the West Bank settlements to plan attacks on Palestinians and incite against the Israeli government.

The same rule should apply to all hatemongers, right or left. Let ‘em in or send ‘em back. In the meantime let Finkelstein take his vacation elsewhere.

Rosenberg implicitly supports Finkelstein’s deportation (he did so explicitly in the e mail exchange) but pulls his punches a bit publicly.

Several things bother me about Rosenberg’s claims here. But first, let me say that I agree with Rosenberg’s sense that Finkelstein is a bit of a ranter and that some of his views are offensive. I too thought it was outrageous for Finkelstein to claim on the one hand that he had no right to tell Lebanese what to do, and on the other to shame the interviewer for not putting up more of a fight against Israelis.

But Rosenberg is dead wrong about Finkelstein’s overall views about Israel. M.J. has fallen into Finkelstein’s own trap by adopting the sweeping, black and white judgments (I thought you wrote your column in grays, M.J.) the latter uses in his rhetorical arguments. Finkelstein is not “anti-Israel.” He is anti-Israeli policy. He is anti-Lebanon war. In fact, Finkelstein supports a 2-state solution just as M.J. and I do. In calling him “anti-Israel,” M.J. makes precisely the same mistake that right-wingers make when they call people like him and me anti-Israel. We’ve both been victims of these slurs and shouldn’t fall prey to them merely because Finkelstein espouses views somewhat more vehement than our own.

I challenge M.J. to come up with any statements of Finkelstein’s that are truly anti-Israel; that proclaim a one-state solution or are anti-Zionist. He can’t. So M.J., a little more precision is called for especially since you have a public platform and the ears of so many liberal Jews.

In my Comment is Free piece, I conceded that Finkelstein’s formulations can be annoying and offensive at times. He loves to go for the jugular. That’s not how I debate or argue. But unlike M.J., I’m not willing to turn my back on Finkelstein because he’s not a nice, elegant, smooth-talking debater.

If M.J. remembers his Martin Niemoller, he’ll recall that when tyrants come for their enemies they don’t distinguish between who is most and least offensive. They come for us all sooner or later. If we don’t stand together we hang alone as a signer of the Declaration of Independence famously said.

M.J. is applying his political principles selectively and inconsistently and he should know better. Unlike M.J. I don’t believe anyone should be denied entrance to Israel unless they advocate physical harm against specific individuals or groups. If Finkelstein is eligible for Israeli citizenship (as he is since he is not a criminal), then he should be kosher enough to visit the country. In supporting his deportation, M.J. is depriving Israelis of engaging with his views. And those views are ones espoused by Israeli citizens so there’s no reason Finkelstein should’ve have his own opportunity to espouse them too. Not to mention that Finkelstein wasn’t even visiting Israel. He was visiting the Occupied Territories which Israel hasn’t yet annexed. Therefore, it had absolutely no legal right to bar Finkelstein from travel there.

M.J. you didn’t keep your eye on the ball on this one. You allowed your intense dislike for Finkelstein to cloud the bigger issues. It’s not like you to do this since on so many other issues your analysis is superb.

Livni Calls for New Elections

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

After Ehud Barak called yesterday for Ehud Olmert to resign or take a leave of absence as prime minister, Tzipi Livni, Israel’s foreign minister, called for him to prepare for new elections. The way she formulated her statement is interesting since she would be the likely person to become the next prime minister if Olmert resigned, but new elections were NOT called. It’s interesting that she specifically didn’t call for his resignation, and called instead for new elections. Perhaps she doesn’t want to be seen to be too grasping for political power since calling for new elections doesn’t necessarily entail Olmert resigning. Though everyone knows that this is what she meant.

As usual in Israeli politics, people seem to be performing Kabuki dances which reveal a slight amount of their true intention and mask the rest.

I realize that Olmert is the consummate Israeli political survivor, and have never, till now counted him out no matter how dire the crisis he faced. But this one seems insurmountable. With a fellow Kadima minister now calling for him to go (albeit indirectly) this will give other Kadima MKs a heksher to join in the chorus. Olmert will eventually go. When and how remains to be seen.

I’m deeply apprehensive about who will assume the leadership. If Netanyahu, all is lost. I don’t even want to think about how dire the situation will become on all counts. If Livni, there is hope. As I’ve said here she seems to be a principled moderate. One also has to give her respect for traveling a long way from her family legacy as a doyenne of the nationalist far-right. Olmert in some senses was a pragmatist who never had the courage of his convictions. Livni is a pragmatist who just might have the courage of hers. The jury’s out on that one. Barak is a hopeless case as are Labor’s chances of doing well in the next election. The party seems to be a doddering corpse. It will be lucky to gain 5 seats in the next Knesset. The battle, unfortunately, is for the political center. The left is virtually lost. Though if Labor disintegrates this might bode well for Meretz which might pick up a few seats.

Haim Watzman of South Jerusalem believes that Bibi will be Israel’s next prime minister.  He may be right thought I  hope to God he’s not.  I think that if Olmert will step aside and allow Livni to take over and she can lead the country for six months or so and gain political traction and display leadership skills, she just might win over enough Israelis that she could get elected in her own right.  It would not be easy since Bibi and Likud would be breathing down her neck and formidable adversaries.  Anyway, this is my dream.  It’s a pragmatic dream rather than a visionary dream.  But it’s a far better dream than the nightmare of another bout of Bibi.

I watched a Haaretz video which makes a new claim that Uri Messer had access to a Talansky bank account from which he withdrew huge amounts of cash at will. The account contained over $350,000 according to the report. I can’t find any trace of this story in any of the Israeli English-language press. The story must be in Haaretz’s Hebrew language version. Stuff like this will sink Olmert. I’m astounded at not only his venality, but the sophomoric ways in which he concealed his money-grubbing. For an Israeli prime minister to be such a venal Keystone cop is embarrassing to say the least.

Joltin’ Joe to Break Bread With Holocaust Hagee

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

To continue the reference to Mrs. Robinson: “Anyway you look at it, you lose.”

Joe Lieberman is in the delicious position of being damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t. He’s just announced that he plans to address Hagee’s Christians United for Israel annual conference:

Sen. Joe Lieberman said Wednesday he will address a conference hosted by the Rev. John Hagee, who was spurned by Republican John McCain for his claim that God sent Adolf Hitler to help Jews reach the promised land.

”I believe that Pastor Hagee has made comments that are deeply unacceptable and hurtful,” Lieberman, I-Conn., said in a statement. ”I also believe that a person should be judged on the entire span of his or her life’s works. Pastor Hagee has devoted much of his life to fighting anti-Semitism and building bridges between Christians and Jews.”

Joe, if you judge Hagee on the “entire span of his life’s work” and don’t declare him a bizarre figure who wants to love Jews to death, then you should have your own head examined. Hagee wants to build bridges between CERTAIN Christians and CERTAIN Jews. He doesn’t want to build bridges to secular Jews (who after all make up the vast majority of American Jews), who he blames for bringing the Holocaust on the Jewish people in an interesting and twisted bit of theological mumbo-jumbo. He doesn’t want to build bridges to secular Israelis. He wants to build bridges to AIPAC, the Israel-First crowd, the Orthodox, and the settlers. Those are the Jews he loves and a relatively slim cross-section of the overall Jewish community.

But as I wrote above, Joe would be damned if he didn’t as well. If he withdrew from speaking, he’d be conceding to those liberals critics he detests so much that their judgment about Hagee’s perniciousness is accurate. He wouldn’t want to do anything like that, oh no. So that puts him in the incredibly awkward position of chumming it up with a preacher with whom John McCain has just broken all ties. If McCain doesn’t feel uncomfortable with all this then we in the political blog world should help him understand it better than he does.

This is a delightful new development for Obama, who can hammer home that John McCain and his strongest ally are still wallowing at the trough of Jew haters (can someone who predicts the death of 2/3 of the world’s Jews in Holocaust II be described any other way?) disguised as lovers of Zion.

If Obama wins in November and the Democrats, as expected, make further gains in the Senate, then poor Joe will become a total political irrelevance. And once the people of Connecticut get the message, perhaps they will finally send Ned Lamont to the U.S. senate, where he belongs.

Separation Wall: Ctrl-Alt-Del

Thursday, May 29th, 2008
separtion wall ctrl-alt-deleteSeparation Wall separating G.ho.st’s Ramallah office from its Modiin office (Rita Castelnuovo, NYT)

I have to say I’ve been disappointed at the N.Y. Times coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict lately, especially some of the work of its new bureau chief, Ethan Bronner. But today’s report (not written by Bronner) on an Israeli-Palestinian internet startup, was delightful and produced this wonderful, incisive image portraying computer geek graffiti slamming Israel’s Separation Wall.

I especially enjoy the way in which the computer-speak has been transferred from the technical realm to the political. You’ll note that the actual purpose of the technical command Ctrl-Alt-Del has nothing to do with the political commentary. But if you return the actual words to their English meanings it sharpens the satire: control (the purpose of the Wall); alt (alter the status quo); delete (self-evident). Kudos to the graffiti artists.

Here’s some color about the company, G.ho.st, and the difficulties it faces in having Israeli and Palestinian computer engineers collaborate on this project:

The Palestinian office in Ramallah, with about 35 software developers, is responsible for most of the research and programming. A smaller Israeli team works about 13 miles away in the central Israeli town of Modiin.

The stretch of road separating the offices is broken up by checkpoints, watch towers and a barrier made of chain-link fence and, in some areas, soaring concrete walls, built by Israel with the stated goal of preventing the entry of Palestinian suicide bombers.

Palestinian employees need permits from the Israeli army to enter Israel and attend meetings in Modiin, and Israelis are forbidden by their own government from entering Palestinian cities.

When permits cannot be arranged but meetings in person are necessary, colleagues gather at a rundown coffee shop on a desert road frequented by camels and Bedouin shepherds near Jericho, an area legally open to both sides.

I especially enjoyed the fact that the actual product being developed mirrors in technological terms the project’s attempt in political terms to transcend the barriers erected to defeat such cooperation:

The goal of G.ho.st is not as lofty as peace, although its founders and employees do hope to encourage it. Instead G.ho.st wants to give users a free, Web-based virtual computer that lets them access their desktop and files from any computer with an Internet connection. G.ho.st, pronounced “ghost,” is short for Global Hosted Operating System.

“Ghosts go through walls,” said Zvi Schreiber, the company’s British-born Israeli chief executive, by way of explanation…

“I felt the ultimate goal was to offer every human being a computing environment which is free, and which is not tied to any physical hardware but exists on the Web,” he said. The idea, he said, was to create a home for all of a user’s online files and storage in the form of a virtual PC.

Instead of creating its own Web-based software, the company taps into existing services like Google Docs, Zoho and Flickr and integrates them into a single online computing system.

Haaretz on Finkelstein

Monday, May 26th, 2008

Haaretz has weighed in with a cogent defense of Norman Finkelstein’s right to travel to Israel in Who’s Afraid of Finkelstein?

In Finkelstein’s case, the disturbing issue is neither the legality of keeping him out nor the authority to do so, but the reasonableness of the decision. Considering his unusual and extremely critical views, one cannot avoid the suspicion that refusing to allow him to enter Israel was a punishment rather than a precaution

True, the right to enter Israel is not guaranteed to noncitizens, but the right of Israeli citizens to hear unusual views is one that should be fought for. It is not for the government to decide which views should be heard here and which ones should not.

The decision to ban Finkelstein hurts us more than it hurts him.

…It is…reasonable to assume that Finkelstein is persona non grata, and that the Shin Bet, whose influence has increased to frightening proportions, latched onto his meetings with Hezbollah operatives in order to punish him.

And the decision is all the more surprising when one recalls the ease with which right-wing activists from the Meir Kahane camp – the kind whose activities pose a [real] security threat – are able to enter the country.

There has been a disturbing new development in the online discussion of the Finkelstein affair. At Mondoweiss, Bill Pearlman, writing under the pseudonym, Sword of Gideon, wrote this:

“It’s too bad that they didn’t shoot the scumbag.”

I also note that Finkelstein, at his own site, features this personal e mail from Pearlman:

To: normangf[at]hotmail.com
Subject:
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:46:22 -0400
From: wpearlman@aol.com

Aren’t you dead yet. Bill Pearlman

I know Bill to be an ignorant, essentially harmless bigot. So the point isn’t that Bill might perpetrate violence against Finkelstein. Rather, there are Kahanist zealots out there who would target fellow Jews for violent attack. I’m not sure how much we should worry for Finkelstein’s safety. But the problem with odious rulings like the one made by the Shin Bet is that it declares open season for Jewish wingnuts on the victim.

That’s all the more reason that Finkelstein, in this particular fight, deserves the support of all Jewish progressives, including those who disagree with his political views.

My own Comment is Free piece will be published at the Guardian 7AM eastern time (Tuesday).