Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

The New Jerusalem: Spinoza in NY

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “The New Jerusalem: Spinoza in NY”.

6 Responses to “The New Jerusalem: Spinoza in NY”

  1. imjudy86 says:

    If all the Jews of his time had followed Spinoza. there wouldn’t be any “Hebrew Tribe” left today. Or maybe people dont’ think that would have been such a bad thing?

  2. The Golem says:

    Judy,

    Maybe, but maybe Reform and Conservative Judaism might have started two centuries earlier.

  3. Gene says:

    I, too, wish I could attend the play.

    Last summer, I got hold of two books on him: Steven Nadler’s Spinoza: A Life and Jonathan Israel’s Radical Enlightenment. An extraordinary journey and a wonderful experience!

  4. The issue isn’t whether all the Jews of his time would have become his followers since that would be an impossibiilty. The issue is whether the Jewish community could have allowed have room for debate about theological (& in today’s world, political) issues that it didn’t need to ostracize one of its most brilliant and thoughtful members for an alleged infraction.

    Interesting that imjudy favors herem against theologically treif Jews. Prob. also favors putting those of us who don’t see things politically as she does in herem as well.

  5. imjudy says:

    Richard-do you believe in “Herem” for those you don’t like, such as AIPAC, West Bank settlers, Lev Leviev, etc? It seems to me that the “herem” is alive and well today and a pan-Jewish phenomenon, visible among all groups—by this I mean intolerance for those who oppose one’s views and attempts to silence them.

  6. Imjudy: No. The diff. bet. the Jewish right & me is that they don’t believe I’m a Jew & I believe that they are. They are just Jews whose views I disapprove of. But I wouldn’t write them out of the tribe as Spinoza’s peers did. If you look at any Kahanist or settler site or Masada 2000 you will see quotation marks around the word “rabbi” for any individual whose views they detest. That’s not an approach I approve of.

Leave a Reply