<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Haaretz Insists on No Holds Barred Debate Over Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, What About U.S. Media?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2007/10/18/haaretz-insists-on-no-holds-barred-debate-over-israeli-palestinian-conflict-what-about-us-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2007/10/18/haaretz-insists-on-no-holds-barred-debate-over-israeli-palestinian-conflict-what-about-us-media/</link>
	<description>Essays on politics, culture and ideas about Israeli-Arab peace and world music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne Capozzoli</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2007/10/18/haaretz-insists-on-no-holds-barred-debate-over-israeli-palestinian-conflict-what-about-us-media/comment-page-1/#comment-49058</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Capozzoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2007/10/18/haaretz-insists-on-no-holds-barred-debate-over-israeli-palestinian-conflict-what-about-us-media/#comment-49058</guid>
		<description>I have always heard that there is a no holds barred debate on all issues in Israel -- you provided an example.  I admire Israelis for that kind of &quot;all is acceptable&quot; controversy.  And I hear that they argue issues constantly with each other.  It must be a very stimulating place to live. Americans are so nationalistic that it is difficult to honestly examine all sides of most issues--especially international issues. Most Americans are conviced that we are always right.   And we certainly are not able to honestly examine all sides of the Palestinian/Israeli dispute -- it is an unwritten rule in the TV media to never allow the Palestinian side to be heard.    I greatly admire the Peace Now advocates in Israel who so eloquently defend Palestinian rights or, should I say, lack of rights.   I wonder if Americans would be so tolerant in the same situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always heard that there is a no holds barred debate on all issues in Israel &#8212; you provided an example.  I admire Israelis for that kind of &#8220;all is acceptable&#8221; controversy.  And I hear that they argue issues constantly with each other.  It must be a very stimulating place to live. Americans are so nationalistic that it is difficult to honestly examine all sides of most issues&#8211;especially international issues. Most Americans are conviced that we are always right.   And we certainly are not able to honestly examine all sides of the Palestinian/Israeli dispute &#8212; it is an unwritten rule in the TV media to never allow the Palestinian side to be heard.    I greatly admire the Peace Now advocates in Israel who so eloquently defend Palestinian rights or, should I say, lack of rights.   I wonder if Americans would be so tolerant in the same situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.richardsilverstein.com @ 2012-02-12 23:57:11 by W3 Total Cache -->
