I believe I can also explain why Soviet ethnic Ashkenazi commissars believed the Ukrainian peasantry were animals that only understood the gun or whip. It does not mean that I consider the brutality directed against Ukrainian peasants to have been justified.

This type of historical process is active at all times. If we want to stop it, we have to understand it.

The NY Times approach “(1) We know that Jews are disproportionately represented among Soviet mass murderers and genocidaires. (2) We will have Walter Duranty lie about it” simply does not work.

The Times then continued this stupidity by burying stories about mass murders of Jews during WW2 (see Buried by the Times by Laura Leff).

Nowadays the Times and its columnists like Thomas Friedman consistently misreport and misanalyse Palestine [link deleted] and the ME in general to the harm of Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, the USA and the world.

We have to understand processes that turn people in mass murderers and avoiding reporting the facts (as the Times has consistently done for nearly 100 years — actually more if one reviews the Times coverage of the Sudanese Mahdi in the 19th century) makes understanding impossible.

In short, we have to stop talking about the mass murder of Jews or ethnic Ashkenazim during WW2 as the most heinous crime in the history of humanity. We need to recognize that because of historical processes since the collapse of the Polish Republic after 1648, ethnic Ashkenazim became a toxic minority hated for completely understandable reasons throughout Eastern Europe and Russian territories.

Unfortunately, one of the activities that human beings perform esp. well is mass murder. It’s happened throughout human history. That doesn’t excuse Israeli practice. But places it into context. There must be amends made for crimes against Israeli Arabs and Palestinians. Though I eliminating Israel both will not happen & would be compounding the original crime.

Joachim: I know how important these issues are to you. But I warn you that I don’t plan on exhausting myself or my readers arguing over them. In other words, have your say & let’s go on to another subject. I don’t plan on making my blog a forum for discussion about genocide & psychotic ethnic Ashkenazis. That’s why you have your own blog to discuss those issue to your heart’s content.

Article 2

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

——————————————–

Note that items a, b, and c clearly have applied to Palestine since racist Eastern European Ashkenazim began to invade Palestine for the purpose of stealing it from the native population at the end of the 19th century.

You can find my position on the relative significance of the Holoexaleipsis versus the Holocaust in…[link deleted]

This is a “national myth” that just isn’t true. Like most (all?) wars, the “Civil War” was ultimately fought for economic reasons; specifically, the South was not setting, collecting, and remitting to Washington tariffs at the rates that Washington wanted. Had the South done this, then there would have been no war. Whereas it’s true that the end of slavery was a fortunate outcome of the war, that’s not why it was fought. (Even if there had been no slavery in the South, the South still would have seceded for the aforementioned economic reason, and the war was fought to prevent that secession.)

Israel supporters typically point to the history of the USA to justify their support for Zionist genocidaires even though there is no logical argument to justify Zionist crimes on the basis of historical misdeeds in N. America.

For the first 87 years of the existence of the USA, slavery was legal and then we Americans fought a war over the abolition of the slave system. By the logic and precedent of US history, we Americans should now use military force to abolish the Zionist system, which is just as wrong as slavery.

I am not surprised that Gore Vidal recounts a story of Norman Podhoretz’ lack of interest in the US conflict over slavery and the American Civil War.