Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Arens Disinvited From Israeli Academic Conference

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Arens Disinvited From Israeli Academic Conference”.

Tags:

4 Responses to “Arens Disinvited From Israeli Academic Conference”

  1. imjudy says:

    I don’t think it is Arens’ political views that bothered the BGU people. Arens’s position is considered quite radical in Israel, but BGU has numerous people on its staff who are no less controversial (e.g. Neve Gordon) and no one muzzles them, so I would think there is so other reason for it.

  2. I would think there is so other reason for it.

    No. There is one critical diff. bet. Gordon & Arens. Arens is an expert in the extremely sensitive field of computer security & terrorism. At the conference, he would rub shoulders with Mosad & IDF intelligence analysts who are known for their extremely close-minded & intolerant views both regarding free expression of ideas & the Palestinian “menace” to Israel. In their close-minded universe, contact w. Arens would somehow lead to compromising of Israeli security.

  3. imjudy says:

    Can you clarify how he would be perceived as being a danger to Israeli security, in this case?

  4. You might want to inquire of the conference organizers at Ben Gurion, the Mosad & IDF as to why they refused to attend if Arens would be there. I’m not the one who made that decision.

    There are 2 reasons he might be considered persona non grata by the government. First, his views are extremely critical of the Occupation & the intelligence services are notoriously unwilling to engage w. ideas they consider anathema. Second, since Arens is an expert in computer security related to terrorism issues they might feel that sharing information w. him might compromise Israeli security. This is just a surmise on my part since, thank God, I’m not an Israeli spook. But if the Shin Bet can consider Azmi Bishara an Arab spy, then I have no doubt the Mosad could easily consider Arens a security risk. It would be a preposterous supposition, but one I’m fully confident the Mosad might make given their past history.

Leave a Reply

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE