Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for November, 2006

KGB on Warpath Against ‘Enemies of the State?’

Thursday, November 30th, 2006

British authorities seem to be tracing an ever more inexorable and tightening link back from Alexander Litvinenko’s assassination directly to the Russian KGB/FSB. Lugovi, a former KGB agent who met with Litvinenko that day he fell ill has admitted what the British no doubt already knew, that he flew on one of the planes on which radioactivity has since been detected:

In Moscow, the newspaper Kommersant reported that Andrei Lugovi, one of the two Russians who met with Mr. Litvinenko at the Millennium hotel on the day he became sick, said he had flown on one of the contaminated British Airways jets on Nov. 3.

Mr. Lugovi has denied poisoning Mr. Litvinenko.

I’ll bet he has. But will he take a lie detector test to help ascertain that fact? He has admitted flying on November 3rd after the dead agent fell ill. But no doubt the police will find that he flew TO London on another plane that will be found to have radioactive traces.

And in a further widening of the gyre of weirdness, Yegor Gaidar, a former Russian prime minister and one-time Putin rival appears to have been similarly poisoned at an academic conference at the University of Ireland:

Doctors treating [the] former prime minister and academic who fell ill in Ireland the day after Mr. Litvinenko died, concluded that he had been poisoned, though the substance remained unknown, a spokesman for Mr. Gaidar said.

“They can say he was poisoned, but they cannot say what the substance was,” the spokesman, Valery A. Natarov, said by telephone. “It was not natural. It was not some sort of food or drink.”

Yekaterina Y. Genieva, director general of Russia’s State Foreign Literature Library, traveled with Mr. Gaidar to Ireland and shared breakfast with him on the morning he became ill.

She said he had fruit salad and tea, served by an elderly woman at the site of the conference, the National University of Ireland, Maynooth. “I say this because this was the only other person he encountered” who was not part of the group, she said in an interview on the telephone.

Ms. Genieva said Mr. Gaidar had complained that he felt ill and made arrangements to return to Moscow, but proceeded to give a lecture, then excused himself from the discussion.

Ms. Genieva said she found him in a corridor, vomiting and bleeding from his nose, and waited with him until an ambulance came. He was hospitalized and returned to Moscow two days later on Nov. 26.

The Russian security services seem to be favoring exotic poisons as their chosen method of assassination or intimidation. We’ll have to wait a few more weeks to see whether they fed Gaidar a lethal dose. I certainly hope that this second assassination attempt will make any western security service who may’ve discounted the rogue-like behavior of the KGB sit up and take notice. Litvinenko was not a one off exception to the rule. His death threatens to become the rule unless urgent and forceful diplomatic-security measures are taken to fight back.

The FSB has shown itself perfectly able to silence its critics at home. These new assaults outside of Russia seem to be saying to dissidents (that is, any Russian citizen who refuses to bow their knee to the oligarchs) that those of you who wish to vent your spleen against the Motherland outside our borders will have no protection. While the security services have proven their supremacy at home, they have had less control over events affecting Russia abroad. Think about the Ukraine, which appeared to have outfoxed Gazprom last year by siphoning gas off the latter’s lines when the energy company attempted to freeze an entire nation into submission to its greedy rate-gouging. The Litvinenko murder and Gaidar attempted murder seem to broadcast the message that anyone who bucks the Kremlin will be in danger–and this could include even non-Russians who may have business or political disputes with favored Russian interests. So beware any nation or individual having a such a dispute. Russia is willing to defend its interests by all means necessary, including poisoning and political assassination.

This reminds me a bit of Stalin’s use of terror as a political tool in his battle with his internal enemies. But even Stalin largely knew there were international borders beyond which he could not export his tactics. The one exception being the assassination of Trotsky. The only sign of “progress” is that the new Stalins have found methods more subtle than an ax in the head. And like Bush-Cheney, they seem to chafe at the limits imposed on them by political precedent and say we will pursue our interests outside our borders and even with lethal means.

Thankfully, Dick Cheney has not (yet) slipped Pat Leahy (remember the “fuck you” incident on the floor of Congress?) a radiation cocktail. But after reading about the FSB’s “success” who knows?

UPDATE: I’ve just read an earlier article about the Gaidar poisoning which throws a different light on the incident than my theorizing above. Yesterday, a Times reporter wrote that a number of Russian sources are claiming that while the deaths of Anna Politkovskaya, Alexander Litvinenko and Yegor Gaidar may be connected, it may NOT be governmental figures who are to blame. Though the article deliberately left vague who the responsible parties might be:

Anatoly B. Chubais, a longtime political ally who now heads the country’s electric monopoly, said that Mr. Gaidar appeared to have narrowly escaped an attempt on his life. He said there was a link not only to Mr. Litvinenko’s death but also to the murder of the journalist, Anna Politkovskaya, in October.

“This miraculously incomplete lethal construct — Politkovskaya, Litvinenko and Gaidar — would have been extremely attractive to those seeking an unconstitutional and forceful change of power in Russia,” Mr. Chubais said in televised remarks from St. Petersburg. He did not elaborate, but his remarks suggested he did not believe that the Russian authorities were involved.

In other words, those currently in power may not be responsible, but those who wish to take control when Putin’s reign ends might be.

Gaidar’s daughter appears to share Chubais’ view of the matter:

His daughter Maria, a prominent activist and critic, who was arrested in a protest near the Kremlin last week, said…she did not suspect that her father had been targeted by the authorities.

“I am absolutely sure it was not done by the Russian government,” Ms. Gaidar said.

The Russian Nezavisimaya Gazeta further amplifies Chubais’ theory:

[It] interviewed some analysts who speculated that the recent spate of high profile murders, along with Mr. Gaidar’s suspected poisoning, could be linked to an internal Kremlin power struggle between those advocating a transfer of power and those who wish for President Vladimir V. Putin to remain in office for a third term.

Foxman Calls Beit Hanun UN Fact-Finding Mission Headed by Tutu ‘Kangaroo Court’

Thursday, November 30th, 2006

God Has a Dream: A Vision of Hope for Our Time
It must be Hate Nobel Peace Laureates Month for Abe Foxman and other Jewish leaders who first denounced Jimmy Carter’s allegedly ‘anti-Israel’ book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. Now, Foxman is on the warpath against another Nobel Peace laureate, Archbishop Desmond Tutu. The latter was appointed by the UN Human Rights Council (remember, in the Jewish greybeard leadership playbook all UN bodies hate Israel and are up to no good as far as it is concerned) to investigate recent incidents of IDF brutality in Beit Hanun. Here’s what Abie had to say:

“The appointment of Desmond Tutu as head of the fact-finding mission to Beit Hanun is an extension of the anti-Israel kangaroo court tactics used by the UN Human Rights Council…

“No fact-finding mission can produce balanced and trustworthy results if its leader professes to know all the answers beforehand.

“Tutu has already publicly expressed his anti-Israel views and his opinions regarding what happened in Beit Hanun, and combined with the one-sided anti-Israel mandate provided by the resolution, the results of the mission are all-but preordained…”

And what was Tutu’s sin? What “unbalanced,” “anti-Israel views” has he expressed about Beit Hanun?

“It is an outrage that cries out to heaven and we must condemn it unequivocally as we do the atrocities committed by suicide bombers against Israeli civilians.”

Could it be that in that Evelyn Wood speed reading class Abe took they never taught him to read complete sentences? Or is ANY criticism of Israel, even if balanced by criticism of Palestinian terror ipso facto unfair and biased?? C’mon all you ‘defenders of the faith,’ you know Tutu could’ve danced the hora and sang Hatikva, but if he still denounced IDF massacres of Palestinians he’d be a ‘perfidious Israel-hater,’ at least as far as the Foxmans of the Jewish world see it.

I am not defending the overall work of the UN Human Rights Council which people like Foxman detest as being heavily biased against Israel. There may be valid criticisms of the body’s work. But as far as I’m concerned Desmond Tutu is a towering moral figure who has earned, through his courage in fighting injustice, my trust that he will conduct a fair-minded inquiry. That’s all I’m saying here.

Actually, it is Foxman who not being fair-minded in this instance. It is Foxman who is being overly defensive and downright churlish. Let’s wait till Abie wins his own Nobel before we accord him the right to denounce the world’s towering moral figures. Oh, and in case Mr. Foxman or one of his major domos is reading, I don’t have any upcoming speaking engagements you can sabotage like you did Tony Judt’s.

$2-Million to Muslim-American Lawyer Wrongly Suspected of Terror

Wednesday, November 29th, 2006

Now, add to the long list of botched “Muslim terror” investigations pursued and prosecuted by the Justice Department and FBI the case of one Brandon Mayfield. The counter-terror happy warriors in our government have just made Mr. Mayfield $2-million richer by botching an FBI fingerprint identification which wrongly linked him to the Madrid train bombings carried out by a European Al Qaeda cell:

The federal government agreed to pay $2 million Wednesday to an Oregon lawyer wrongly jailed in connection with the 2004 terrorist bombings in Madrid, and it issued a formal apology to him and his family.

The unusual settlement caps a two-and-a-half-year ordeal that saw…Brandon Mayfield, go from being a suspected terrorist operative to a symbol, in the eyes of his supporters, of government overzealousness in the war on terrorism.

“The United States of America apologizes to Mr. Brandon Mayfield and his family for the suffering caused” by his mistaken arrest, the government’s apology began. It added that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which erroneously linked him to the Madrid bombs through a fingerprinting mistake, had taken steps “to ensure that what happened to Mr. Mayfield and the Mayfield family does not happen again.”

And well do the feds owe this man an apology for the wringer they put him through:

At an emotional news conference in Portland announcing the settlement, Mr. Mayfield said he and his wife, an Egyptian immigrant, and their three children still suffered from the scars left by the government’s surveillance of him and his jailing for two weeks in May 2004.

“The horrific pain, torture and humiliation that this has caused myself and my family is hard to put into words,” said Mr. Mayfield, an American-born convert to Islam and a former lieutenant in the Army.

“The days, weeks and months following my arrest,” he said, “were some of the darkest we have had to endure. I personally was subject to lockdown, strip searches, sleep deprivation, unsanitary living conditions, shackles and chains, threats, physical pain and humiliation.”

Keep in mind that this is an American citizen and former U.S. military officer who was treated similarly to a top-drawer Al Qaeda operative at Guantanamo. This is what our “war on terror” does to our nation’s citizens, let alone to non-citizen/enemy combatants who share none of the currently feeble protections we citizens are guaranteed.

It is quite instructive to learn about the underlying motivations that spurred the government’s zealotry in pursuit of Mayfield:

Despite doubts from Spanish officials about the validity of the fingerprint match, American officials began an aggressive high-level investigation into Mr. Mayfield in the weeks after the bombings. The fact that he had represented a terrorism defendant in a child-custody case in Portland spurred further interest in him. Using expanded surveillance powers under the USA Patriot Act, the government wiretapped his conversations, conducted secret searches of his home and his law office and jailed him for two weeks as a material witness in the case before a judge threw out the case against him.

This is what the John Yoos, John Ashcrofts and Alberto Gonzaleses of the Bush Administration have provided as a legacy to us. In their heyday, all you needed was a flimsy fingerprint ID and representing the wrong client to turn you into Al Qaeda.

This settlement marks yet another significant shift politically away from the national security state created by Bush since 2001 and toward what I hope will be a more tolerant and restrained exercise of government power to protect our citizens from terrorist threat.

British Authorities Investigating Litvinenko Murder Detect Radiation on British Airways Planes

Wednesday, November 29th, 2006

Blowing up Russia : Terror from Within
Ah, the plot thickens on the Litvinenko assassination case. You knew it would. Anything likely stirred up in the murky recesses of the Russian KGB has to have a byzantine plot and lots of dark shadows.

British authorities investigating the case detected radiation traces on three British Airways planes:

The case of the poisoned former K.G.B. agent took a bizarre twist when British Airways said that traces of radiation had been detected Wednesday on jets that flew between London and Moscow, establishing a possible Russian link and indicating that more than 30,000 people might have been exposed to the radiation.

The airline said tests had found “very low traces” of radioactivity so far on two of three Boeing 767s, which were singled out because the police suspected that passengers included people linked to the investigation. At least one of the planes flew between London and Moscow days before the former agent, Alexander V. Litvinenko, fell ill from the radioactive poison, polonium 210, that doctors say killed him.

Gee, I’d say if the police suspected that passengers on board those planes “included people linked to the investigation” they’ve just about busted the case wide open. Those would be the guys who brought the poison from the FSB or government lab in Russia and transported it to London so it could be off-loaded onto the unsuspecting Litvinenko. The British police haven’t solved the murder authoritatively since they need hard evidence for that. But they certainly know by now who really did the poor fellow in.

As many as 30,000 people might’ve been exposed to the radiation. Imagine a spy service willing to potentially harm that many people in order to rid itself of one meddlesome ex-agent. It’s quite breathtaking. Imagine if Putin and his spy cronies ever felt really threatened. What might they then be willing to consider??? It’s not too much of a stretch (at least not for the latter day KGB/FSB) to move from poisoning a single man to poisoning say an entire city of a country whose leaders you detest. Or you could even drop the big one–but that might be going a tad too far for even these overreaching goons.

I’m curious to find out what the Brits will do in response to this egregious violation of national sovereignty. I know they won’t recall their ambassador, but I truly wish they would. Events prove, I’m sorry to say, that the only thing the brutal Russian government understands is brute force (diplomatic, not military) in response to their thuggish acts. Short of that they could expel every single FSB/KGB agent operating under diplomatic cover in England. That would send a message. They could suspend economic agreements and mete out other repercussions which would hit the oligarchs running the country (Russia) where it hurts. But doing nothing or little would be a terrible mistake which would lead to much worse “mischief” down the road not just potentially in London, but Washingtion, New York, Berlin, Paris, Rome, etc. Either reign them in sharply now or regret a missed opportunity later.

Jonah Summer-Fall Photos

Tuesday, November 28th, 2006

Since I’ve uploaded photos of our twins, how could I leave out our new star pupil in the TOPS kindergarten? Here are a few things Jonah did on his summer vacation: he graduated from the Pre-K class at Secret Garden Pre-School and danced in a Pacific NW Ballet children’s program.

first day kindergarten drawing first day kindergarten secret garden pre-k graduation
child in dance costume child ballet recital

1. Janis and Jonah enjoy a moment on the first day of kindergarten.
2. Jonah drawing on his first day of kindergarten
3. Jonah with Laurie Smith after graduating from Secret Garden
4. Jonah wearing dance costume
5. Waiting for dance program to begin

Twin on Horseback, Twin in Sudsy Bubble Heaven

Tuesday, November 28th, 2006

baby on horseback
I know, I know, I’ve been remiss. It’s been far too long since I uploaded any photos of my kids to this blog. My only excuse, and it is a feeble one I concede is that someone (who shall be nameless), who was beloved in every other way, took scores of pictures of the twins and didn’t seem to edit the shots. So I’d find over 100 images in the camera and the idea of editing and uploading them was too much to bear. That’s why it took so long.

There’s been far too much dreariness written here about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I can write a post about it and sparks fly, readers let loose vicious insults or praise. Such conflict!
baby with sudsy bubblebath
But upload a few pictures of the kids and it brings out the best in people. Or perhaps it’s that the best people truly appreciate children, all people’s children including my own and the comments they leave are so uplifting. Anyway, children draw out the best in this blog which is why I like to show off my boychiks and girlchik.

The photo of Miriam is from the Lane Powell family picnic at Remlinger Farms during the summer. She looks entirely too wise and knowing for a 1 1/2 year old, but gorgeous nonetheless (if I do say so myself). The image of Adin is from the Seattle Science Center Bubble Festival also this past summer. He sudsed himself up with bubble bath while having a rollicking good time with his bubble wand.

WordPress Contact Form Spam

Monday, November 27th, 2006

In the past week or so I’ve noticed serious levels of spam coming through my WordPress Contact Form plugin. Even though Ryan Duff’s description of the plugin says that it has anti-spam protection (“Improved Spam Handling– now rejects bot generated spam messages”), the spammers have exploited some sort of weakness in getting their messages through.

I could not understand why a spammer would want to send a spam message through a contact form. I asked Michael Hampton about this and he replied that the bots that spammers use are not smart enough to tell the difference between a contact and a comment form. Which is a reasonable explanation. But it doesn’t explain why for over a year I received no spam using Ryan’s plugin and just now started receiving a serious spam using it.

secure mailer plugin screenshotSecure form mailer screenshot

Anyway, searching the WordPress support forum, Sushubh recommended the Dagon Design Secure Form Mailer plugin since it includes an image verification feature which should foil most bots. I installed it yesterday and have had no spam since then.

There are a few suggestions I’d have for anyone installing. First, I wish the author would’ve packaged the installation files as a zip file to make downloading/uploading a little more convenient. This would’ve avoided having to rename files from .txt to .php plus having to save them individually to one’s hard drive before uploading them. But that’s a minor carp.

Second, after uploading files to their appropriate folders, the installation instructions tell you to “go to Options -> DDFM-Main” and set how many copies of the plugin you want (most users will leave the default setting at one). Here is where the instructions get a little hazy.

After saving the DDFM-Main setting determining the number of copies you want, you must go back up to the Admin control panel and note a new button titled “DDFM1.” This controls the settings for the plugin and it must be configured properly for the plugin to work. My reading of the instructions didn’t make clear that a new DDFM1 button would be created and I hunted high and low for this in a long search until I finally found it.

Also, do not forget to fill in the Recipient Data field which should read something like this: “onerecip|your-e-mail-address.”

Israeli-Palestinian Ceasefire Holds–So Far

Sunday, November 26th, 2006

Almost 24 hours after Israel and the Palestinians agreed to a Gaza ceasefire, it appears to be largely holding. All Israeli forces have withdrawn from Gaza. Mahmoud Abbas has deployed 13,000 security officers throughout the area to deter rocket attacks. This should silence those rightists who continually claim that Palestinians leaders have never done anything to enforce calm in their areas. While Prime Minister Haniye says that all militant groups agreed to the truce, a representative of Islamic Jihad, in explaining why his groups launched rockets after the ceasefire said his group was not party to it. Haniye immediately disputed this characterization. Haaretz claims that three rockets were fired after the ceasefire by Hamas and Islamic Jihad (NY Times claims nine).

The Israeli government appears guardedly optimistic and Olmert announced that he’d ordered the IDF not to fire on Palestinian rocket crews. He also announced that his goal was to create an atmosphere that would lead to peace talks with the Palestinians. All this is excellent news. Some of it is unprecedented as I noted above.

But apparently, there are elements of both the IDF and the far-right political scene who are gnashing their teeth and already mouthing the expected imprecations. What I find strange is that Haaretz notes that IDF officers in the Southern Command have objected to an explicit civilian order coming from no less than the prime minister:

In army circles, and particularly at IDF Southern Command, there is a great deal of skepticism about the agreement. Senior officers have warned that without enforcement and an end to the smuggling of weapons through tunnels from Sinai to Rafah, the cease-fire is a dangerous development.

The officers maintain that Hamas is making enormous efforts to arm itself. They add that when the organization thinks it is ready, its members will resume the violence and then its military capabilities will pose a greater threat to IDF troops.

Senior security sources in Israel pointed out Sunday that leaders in militant groups spoke of a cease-fire only in terms of the Qassam rocket attacks from the Gaza Strip, and did not commit themselves to stopping other forms of attacks in other parts of the territories.

What is ridiculous about this statement is that Israel did not offer a West Bank ceasefire as far as I know. So why would you blame the militants for not observing a West Bank truce if you weren’t observing one yourself?

I think this IDF chuffing and puffing underlies the tenuous relationship between civilian and military authority. In reality, Israeli security policy is run by the IDF with very little control exercised by civilian officials. After all, can you imagine the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff telling the Washington Post that he objected to a policy initiative of his commander in chief? Douglas MacArthur tried that ploy with Truman and it didn’t work for him. There has rarely if ever been such a MacArthur moment in Israeli history because the IDF essentially gets its way on most matters.

The rightist political parties are performing their usual stalking horse role for the military by echoing its carping about the ceasefire:

[They] warned that the militant organizations would take advantage of this hiatus to grow stronger in advance of a renewal of violent actions against Israel.

MK Silvan Shalom (Likud) said,…”We are playing make believe. The cease-fire is imaginary. It will give the Hamas time to get reorganized.” MK Yuval Steinitz (Likud) called on the government to rescind its agreement to a cease-fire, saying: “Israel is missing a golden opportunity to carry out a Defensive Shield 2 [broad ground offensive] in the Gaza Strip, and is in essence enabling the creation of a threat, Hezbollah-style, in the south of the country.”

Imagine, if you will, George Bush announcing a peace initiative for Iraq and the Democrats immediately rejecting it and saying we should carry on till the bloody end. Even if there were such pro-war Democrats remaining, I doubt even they would dare to denounce presidential policy. They might if the policy were tried for a period and it failed. But for the denunciation to come within 12 hours of its initiation seems the height of chutzpah. You know, the right always accuses the left of treason. You could make a reasonable argument that in this case it is the right that is acting in a manner injurious to the interests of the State.