But I’ve been banned by left bloggers and right bloggers and big websites and small websites.

I am not Atheo, but yes, the best bans are the ones where I can post one comment, and boom, immediate bannination.

FARK hasn’t banned me. Jonathan Turley hasn’t banned me. The Volokh Conspiracy hasn’t banned me.

I consider myself a mostly liberal Jew from LA grew up in the sixties, became an engineer, fill in your own stereotypes, you’re probably accurate.

Anyway.

It seems using that certain individual words alone may be all that it takes.

Perhaps Zionism or a phrase such as “Palestinian resistance”.

I’m glad you’ve moved on, because most of what Moulitsas says doesn’t merit our time or attention. However, your expressed credulity for Moulitsas’ responses to the questions about his CIA involvement leads me to doubt your sanity and/or sincerity. I’m sorry to say that in such an unpleasant way, but it’s what I think.

MAMZ has outright lied about the economic resources he had available when he started DailyKos. His family is among the upper crust of the Salvadoran oligarchy, with international influence and paid rolls in globalization. He has not commented on the fact that a family member received a one million dollar loan guarantee for globalization work from the Overseas Private Investment Council (OPIC), according to an OPIC press release.

It’s possible that MAMZ is not a CIA agent, but the fact that he looks like one, even without his confession at the Commonwealth Club, troubles me. This is about the infiltration and manipulation of the American Left and the media’s refusal to cover real American leftists. MAMZ is important politically and negatively because he claims to the media and to politicians that he represents the American Left, which drowns out and distorts the voices of real leftists.

And you’re telling me that we should ignore his admission to CIA contacts because he can’t remember when he entered the CIA orbit and when he left? If he doesn’t remember when he left, maybe it’s because he never left the CIA at all, or never stopped being a CIA asset.

I believe that his Netroots Nation conferences and secret Townhouse Group (and undoubtedly many other secret engagements) are for the purpose of developing CIA assets and then misdirecting them. I was recently contacted by one of those assets, whose interaction with him is public knowledge, and this contact asked me to join a secret group that would make secret political decisions.

I will not join any group until at least those within the group who are suspected of CIA connections have conclusively disproved their connections with the CIA. MAMZ cannot disprove his connections because he has already confessed to them. I will not be a CIA asset through MAMZ or a MAMZ asset, and Truth About Kos warns and discourages others from playing that role.

I was also contacted by Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign’s e-mail guru (can’t remember his name right now), who told me, “We want you to work to elect Hillary Clinton . . . . You know that Markos and I are friends, right?)

What was he trying to tell me that he didn’t come out and say? That if I wanted to be in the Clinton inner blogging circle then I would have to stop writing critically about MAMZ? Was this a back-channel communication from MAMZ himself?

The reason you can’t get anyone to listen to your criticisms of Israel is that there is a massive program of misinformation and obliviousness going on in the United States to convince Americans to accept the relationship with Isreal and forget about the Palestinians. As you have come to realize, MAMZ participates, to the extent of his blog’s abilities, in that massive effort to forget about Israel’s cruel hegemony over the Palestinians and the Lebanese as well. MAMZ little part is the attempt to shut down discussions of Israel (and also shut down doubt of the incredible explanations of 9-11).

I have been contacted by various people who tell me in a friendly way that I might as well stop criticizing MAMZ. One woman claimed to be MAMZ’s neighbor in California and said she didn’t care about him politically, but he was a nasty neighbor. I told her that if she was MAMZ’s neighbor then I wanted her to take his garbage from the curb, put it into a box, and mail it to me, so that I could review its contents. I never received any of MAMZ’s garbage, so I guess that contact’s story was garbage.

The fact that MAMZ was compelled to acknowledge that a lot of people believe he is involved with the CIA is proof positive that the work of the Truth About Kos blog has had the desired effect: to discredit him in the eyes of the public. The media continues to cover him because they know that a lot of the people they cover are CIA agents, and it is an accepted rule that the media should not consider CIA contacts (or should favor them) when deciding whether to cover a media event or not.

MAMZ’s 2% Black and 0% Latino participation at his blog is also an attempt to marginalize Blacks and Latinos as part of the American left. Black bloggers thought this didn’t matter until they found out that no Black or Latino bloggers would be allowed on the floor of the Democratic National Convention, because that privilege was held by MAMZ’s “state bloggers.” MAMZ was effectuating a plan to lock Blacks and Black bloggers out of contact and exposure, using the infrastructure of the Democratic Party. When MAMZ’s actions result in an all-white Democratic Party media floor blogging pool, the MAMZ has become to malignant to ignore.

If he can convince the media that Black Kos represents Blacks, then why would or would the media need to contact us Black bloggers. Thankfully, Black Kos is such a transparent ruse that even the media won’t cover them. They don’t do anything or represent anyone worth covering.

Most of the time I spend on The Truth About Kos is when I daily review the hits in order to see where Truth About Kos has been cited and quoted and used by others to prove that MAMZ is a liar whose views and concocted appearance of leftist leadership are fallacious.

When people use the Truth About Kos to discredit Kos, simply by placing a link in the comments at another blog, I know that this part of my efforts has been well done, even if I don’t do anything more.

It is a pleasure, though, that MAMZ acknowledges that he is widely suspected of being CIA. That suspicion started with Stu-Piddy and me and it limits the harm that MAMZ can cause to the American left and American politics in general.

This I can tell you with certainty. MAMZ will never run for public office (although he once suggested that he wanted to) because his opponent would access the Truth about Kos blog and use reams of evidence to show that there is something very incredible about MAMZ and he can’t be trusted. I feel I’m doing the public a significant service, even if I never update Truth About Kos again.

Francis

“But the truth is that Markos hates I-P & thinks it detracts fr the goal of electing Dems, which is what DK exists to do.
“

Don’t kid yourself. Markos C. Alberto Moulitsas (MAMZ) told an audience that he was trained for two years at the CIA after being a lifelong Republican, until he says that he voted for Clinton in 1996 (but for George H.W. Bush in 1992).

Incredibly, MAMZ says he moved away from the Republican Party when they stopped supporting state’s rights (like the right to discriminate against the disabled, the right to discriminate against women and Blacks). That’s why he was a Republican. The explanation strains credulity and adds insult to injury.

MAMZ says he spent 2 years training at the CIA. Whatever the CIA trained him to do, I don’t believe that it was to elect more Democrats to the US Congress. I wonder if their goal was not to convince Democrats to elect pro-military “(veterans)” to the US Congress. Does anyone remember MAMZ’s push to get military veterans to run for office in the Democratic Party?

Whatever the CIA trained MAMZ to do, I don’t think it was to help Democrats get elected. Perhaps it was to legitimize the CIA within liberal or leftist people. Maybe they just wanted him to steer the conversation away from Guantanamo Bay, the incredible official explanation of September 11, and other topics that make the CIA uncomfortable.

Remember the Valerie (sp.?) Plame hysteria at DK and the outrage at the outing of a CIA agent? When did protecting the secrecy of CIA cover stories become a leftist goal? I think it was right around the time that ex-military and then-current CIA trainee Moulitsas started Daily Kos. That when we suddenly realized that leftist energies should be spent on a case where Republicans outed a secret CIA agent.

And why all of the secrecy at DailyKos. Is anyone doing anything so important at DailyKos that their broken anonymity would threaten the Left? The secretive nature of DaiilyKos participants enables the MAMZ to hide the truth about CIA involvement in DailyKos.

If we could Google the real names of DK members, we might decide that we didn’t want to be associated with such people. If the Civil Rights Movement was able to proceed with greater success as more people put their lives on the line, it’s hard to understand why a group of middle-aged white guys need anonymity.

Either MAMZ lied about his CIA training, o . . . MAMZ lied about his CIA training.

If MAMZ is such a great tactician, then how did the Teabaggers grab hold of the momentum and take over the Congress last year? Why didn’t he see it coming and chart a counter-course? It seems to me that MAMZ proved pretty much irrelevant to the results of the 2010 election. And one of the Congressman he helped to elect was forced to step down in a massively bad PR re:sex scandal.

In a 2010 Politico.com article, MAMZ said:

“Your relevance is directly proportional to the amount of chatter you generate about yourself. Given that I’m trying to have an impact on the American political system, I’m more than happy to tolerate crazy CIA conspiracy theories about me. “

http://www.politico.com/click/stories/1008/answer_this_moulitsas.html

It seems to me that MAMZ’s “chatter” helps MAMZ more than anyone else and, in this case, the chatter was started on June 2, 2006, when MAMZ said that he had spent two years training at the CIA.

http://truth-about-kos.blogspot.com/2011/08/moulitsas-acknowledges-that-many.html

How can he call it a “crazy CIA conspiracy theory” when it is HE who asserted that he spend two years training at the CIA between 2001 and 2003? It makes me think that a lot of MAMZ’s reason for hating conspiracy theories is that he, himself, is involved in so many conspiracies that he doesn’t want to acknowledge. Who most hates conspiracy theories? The person with the most active conspiracies.

A lot of people say MAMZ made a huge tactical error by banning me, because I then put considerable energy into researching and exposing him and his family, with startling results:

http://truth-about-kos.blogspot.com/2007/08/indictment-of-markos-ca-moulitsas-ziga.html

I never expected to find so much information showing, e.g that he is from a Salvadoran oligarchy family one member of which got a one million dollar loan guarantee from the Overseas Private Investment Council (OPIC) aimed at globalization of business in Central America. I didn’t know MAMZ’s family was for globalization, but now I do.

I wonder if MAMZ will still be a advocate for Democratic constituencies (NOT), when his mother dies and he inherits a substantial portion of Club Joya del Pacífico, whose website says that they own the largest uninterupted stretch of beach in El Salvador and where they charge $140 US Dollars per night for a hotel room back in 2007.

MAMZ just ain’t what he says he is. Getting banned from DK is like losing a job at a hotdog stand that is secretly, really selling cocaine. Banned is better.