Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

New York Times AWOL Over Miller-Libby Story

While Bill Keller continues to proclaim that Times readers (and staff) should just sit tight and be patient for the Pulitzer that will surely come their way when they finally get around to telling all about the Miller-Libby CIA leak investigation story, the rest of the news world is actually covering the story:

Bill Keller, The Times’s executive editor, said: “It’s a great relief to have Judy out of legal jeopardy. And it should clear the way for The Times to do what we’ve been yearning to do: tell the story.” Mr. Keller had said in an earlier message to the paper’s staff that once Ms. Miller’s “obligations to the grand jury are fulfilled, we intend to write the most thorough story we can of her entanglement with the White House leak investigation.”

Take the Times latest story yesterday which essentially was a rehash of details that anyone following this story already knows (except for the report that Miller’s contempt citation had been lifted). What’s worse about this article though is that it omits important details about this story that have already been reported at Editor & Publisher and Newsweek (see my post). I just don’t get the Times’ diffidence. Did they refuse to include these developments because they couldn’t verify them themselves? If so, then why not at least allude to the other stories while noting that they aren’t sourced or proven. Whatever, but at least say something real instead of rehasing what we already know.

This approach makes one begin to suspect what we’ll read when the paper finally does get around to telling us what it knows. Will it tell us all? Will it fudge facts that may make Miller, Keller or the Times look bad? Given Times coverage up till now, I don’t have a lot of faith that their finished product is going to be much more satisfying than what we’ve gotten till now.

Leave a Reply

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE