Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for November, 2004

Tom DeLay: Playing Fast and Loose with Ethics

Thursday, November 18th, 2004
tom_delay.jpg

Tom DeLay (for a more comprehensive and less partisan biography, see Wikipedia‘s biographical entry) is a former exterminator who never saw a shady cockroach he didn’t love. So it’s no wonder that his fellow roaches in the House Republican caucus have given him his very own “Get Out of Jail” card in case he’s indicted in a brewing Texas political fundraising scandal (House GOP Acts to Protect Chief). Three of his cronies running his various PACs have been indicted and perhaps Tom is not far behind. At least that’s what Tom must be thinking otherwise why would he blackmail his caucus into overturning its own rule declaring that any Republican leader indicted for an offense carrying a penalty of two years of jail or more must step down?

Why did his House colleagues roll over and play dead for Tom? Certainly they know that a good exterminator knows how to squash bugs. Take Christopher Shays (Rep., CT) as an example. Shays is a long-term Congress member who came to Congress in the Gingrich landslide of 1994. He’s always been something of a maverick among the conservative bestiary in the House. Today, he eloquently denounced the caucus for its vote. He made clear that he knew that his chance to chair a powerful House committee was on the line. He understood that his statement against the vote could cost him this plum assignment. But he stated, I needed to weigh my political future against my ethical judgment. And my conscience is more important to me than political or personal gain. I’d say Chris is positioning himself to come out of this smelling like a rose when De Lay IS indicted and the rest of the country wakes up to the shenanigans his underlings are trying to pull on the rest of us. To continue our exterminator metaphor, Shays doesn’t want to be the last rat off the sinking ship–in fact he wants to be the first and that’s a credit to him.

What’s ironic about this development is that the original Republican rule dates back to the days of Democratic speaker Jim Wright, who himself faced ethics charges which eventually drove him from office. Newt Gingrich, in attempting to establish the ethical bona fides of House Republicans and to point out the Democrats shortcomings, championed this ethics rule.

How interesting that now that De Lay faces the same type of charges which toppled Jim Wright, Tony Coelho and Newt Gingrich, he decides to jettison the ethical niceties. This tells the world that House Republicans believe in ethics only when it’s convenient to them. The only bad behavior they ever see is on the part of Democrats. Certainly, no Republican could ever be guilty of such lapses, right?

Once De Lay is indicted (that phrase has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it?), there will be a hue and cry from the entire nation ridiculing this vote and the House Republicans for thinking that they should be allowed to hold themselves to a lower standard than their predecessors. There’s already enough moral turpitude in Congress and the body is held in terribly low repute by the average American. Today’s vote only makes this impression stronger.

Babies: Coming Down to the Wire

Monday, November 15th, 2004

It’s getting down to the wire with the twins.  They’re due December 7th and we’re hoping Janis makes it that far.  But we’re on tenterhooks.  We just came back from the OB and her blood pressure is hovering in the high 80s (anything 90 or above and they start looking for symptoms of preeclampsia and sentence you to the hospital).  Thank God, we’re not there yet.

Janis is on "almost strict" bed rest.  She can move around the house, but needs to strictly limit going up and down stairs.  She, of course, can only leave the house to go to the doctor’s office.  Dr. Levine says that every spare ounce of energy she can preserve (by not moving) helps the babies to grow stronger.

At our last visit, the babies gave us a bit of a scare though not a big one.  The girl had grown 8 oz and this was good.  But the boy had grown only 2 ounces and slipped from the 46th percentile (2 weeks prior) to the 10th.  Now, the 10th percentile still isn’t grounds for fear, but it is grounds for concern.  With a single pregnancy, when the baby gets to the 5th percentile or below, the OB begins to consider immediate delivery.  With twins, everything is smaller so the standards on which you base such a decision are different.  But if they stop growing when we do the next ultrasound (around Thanksgiving), then we might do an immediate delivery.

We’re now just over 35 weeks.  As 38 is considered full term for twins and 36 guarantees full lung development, we’re in a pretty good space.  But I’d love Janis to get close to 38 weeks.  We’ll see how it goes.  We’re a little rattled.  But in a year’s time I’ll look back on this post and see it as irrelevant (I hope).  But now, it feels like crunch time.

We’re doing all those things you do when you’re getting ready for a baby.  The room where the twins will live is getting cleaned out and painted this week.  I went out last week and…get this…bought a Nissan Quest mini-van.  Yes, the things we do that we’ve never before contemplated!  I definitely never thought myself mini-van material.  But things change.  We bought a Volvo V-70 station wagon in March.  Janis got pregnant in April.  If only I’d waited to buy that Volvo a few weeks, I wouldn’t now be stuck with a mini-van and a station wagon as my two cars.  I long for the day when the Volvo lease ends and I can buy the tiniest car available–perhaps a Toyota hybrid.

I just bought a Canon digital camera online so I can get lots of shots of the newcomers.  Now, lets hope the camera arrives before the little ones do!

Thanks to all those readers who’ve wished us well on reading my previous baby posts.  We’ll sure need all the love and good wishes we can get over the next year.

I haven’t blogged here in a while.  Which leads me to my next subject.  I can see that the frequency of my posting is going to have to go down.  When you’ve got three babies under four, something’s gotta give; and I guess it’s gotta be my blog.  I dearly love this blog and I’m gonna miss blogging.  But I’m not giving it up entirely.  I can just see that the frequency of my posting is going to decline and there may even be periods with nothing from me.

I’m looking forward to the day I can get back to this.  But it may take a while.

Ashcroft Resigns: Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish

Wednesday, November 10th, 2004

Either my mother or grandmother used to say about something or someone they really detested: "good riddance to bad rubbish."  Well, that’s about how I feel about John Ashcroft.  Not only was he a vicious, divisively ideological attorney general.  He was especially inept at his job.Ashcroft390

The New York Times wrote:

He also frequently went on television to announce the disruption of terrorist "sleeper cells" in the United States and to issue terror warnings.

But terrorism prosecutions in Detroit and elsewhere would crumble or come under withering criticism, and a report from the Justice Department’s own inspector general objected to the department’s prolonged detention – and occasional physical abuse – of hundreds of illegal immigrants with no clear ties to terrorism who were arrested in the period after the attacks.

His staff wrote memos justifying torture of terror suspects and advocating the irrelevance of the Geneva Conventions to the issue (a position soundly rejected by a recent Supreme Court decision which the Department continues obstinately to refuse to implement).  His prosecutors successfully prosecuted almost no one suspected of terrorist links.  He’s managed to goad his opponents by rubbing salt in the wounds he created–going to far as to say in Congressional testimony that those who raise the fears of the American people that their liberties will be endangered (that’s you and me, the ACLU and countless civil liberties groups) are" doing the work of Al Qaeda."  As the New York Times describes it:

Mr. Ashcroft himself set the tone for the division less than three months after the attacks when he said before a Senate panel: "To those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists, for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve.”

With Ashcroft, you can’t have an honest difference of opinion.  If so, you’re a traitor.  Plain and simple.

What’s Next? Outlawing Contraception?

Wednesday, November 10th, 2004

There are times in writing a blog about politics when it seems like all you do is right about the latest outrages, moral depredations and bankrupt ideas spewing forth from the Moral Majority.  Today is no exception.  My brother sent me the following article which really opens one’s eyes as to how far backward this country can go in reneging on women’s rights and how quickly.

But first a preface: my mother is a bitter, rather withdrawn woman.  She rarely, if ever shares her deepest personal feelings, even with those close to her.  So it was with infinite surprise I heard this story.  In the early 1950s, she was a new wife living in Washington Heights (New York City).  She went into the local pharmacy and asked for condoms.  The pharmacist replied that he couldn’t sell women condoms.  She doubtless felt terribly ashamed to be rejected in such a way.

Now, fifty years have gone by and women are still subject to such humiliation and it’s a crying shame.  But today, women don’t have to take such insults lying down as my mother did.Eckerd's refuses to sell contraceptives to women who won't take it 'lying down'

With George Bush’s re-election the Moral Majority is on the rise again.  Beating back gay marriage, abortion rights, and even contraception are high on the agenda of religious fundamentalists.  USA Today ran an eye-opening article, Druggists refuse to give out pill, describing an incipient movement by some of the nation’s pharmacists to refuse to sell contraceptives to women.  Strangely, the pharmacists’ professional association and impending state laws allow such outrageous behavior.

The American Pharmacists Association, with 50,000 members, has a policy that says druggists can refuse to fill prescriptions if they object on moral grounds, but they must make arrangements so a patient can still get the pills. Yet some pharmacists have refused to hand the prescription to another druggist to fill.

…States from Rhode Island to Washington have proposed laws that would protect such decisions.

I say, if you want to be a pharmacist you must sell the standard inventory of what customers want to buy.  If you don’t want to sell such items for whatever reason, well, you shouldn’t be a pharmacist.  Pick another profession that doesn’t involve making moral judgments about your customers.

The most outrageous behavior concerns the pharmacists who not only refuse to sell contraceptives, but actually confiscate the prescription form and refuse to return it.  This in turn forces the customer to return to the doctor to get a new one.

In Madison, Wis., a pharmacist faces possible disciplinary action by the state pharmacy board for refusing to transfer a woman’s prescription for birth-control pills to another druggist or to give the slip back to her. He would not refill it because of his religious views.

I say sue their ass.  Demonstrate as the courageous women in the accompanying photo have done.  Let the company which owns the pharmacy know that not only will this specific pharmacy be boycotted, but their entire chain might face a national boycott.  When this kind of outrageous morally aggressive behavior becomes the norm, there’s only one recourse–fight back!

Gary Hart Has a Thing or Two to Teach Us (and George Bush) About Religion and Morality

Monday, November 8th, 2004

HartWho’d have thought in 1984 that there’d come a future time when I’d actually welcome an opinion column (When the Personal Shouldn’t Be Political) from Gary Hart about ethics, morality and religion.  It just shows you how debased our politics have become that that tarnished human being, Gary Hart can breathe some animating spirit into the debate over the use and abuse of religion in American political life.

By the way, I think the editor who chose this title didn’t do a service to the article.  Clearly, the headline writer wanted to play off the phrase, "the personal is political."  But Hart’s article is about faith, religion and politics, not about something so vague as the word "personal."

Hart’s closing paragraphs are a clarion call for prudence, restraint, moderation and humility in American politics, all qualities that George Bush distinctly lacks:

There is also the disturbing tendency to insert theocratic principles into the vision of America’s role in the world. There is evil in the world. Nowhere in our Constitution or founding documents is there support for the proposition that the United States was given a special dispensation to eliminate it. Surely Saddam Hussein was an evil dictator. But there are quite a few of those still around and no one is advocating eliminating them. Neither Washington, Adams, Madison nor Jefferson saw America as the world’s avenging angel. Any notion of going abroad seeking demons to destroy concerned them above all else. Mr. Bush’s venture into crusaderism frightened not only Muslims, it also frightened a very large number of Americans with a sense of their own history.

The religions of Abraham all teach a sense of personal and collective humility. It was a note briefly struck very early by Mr. Bush and largely abandoned thereafter. It would be well for those in the second Bush term to ponder that attribute. Whether Bush supporters care or not, people around the world now see America as arrogant, self-righteous and superior. These are not qualities of any traditional faith I am aware of.

If faith now drives our politics, at the very least let’s make it a faith of inclusion, genuine compassion, humility, justice and accountability. In the words of the prophet Micah: "He hath shown thee, O man, what is good. What doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?" And, instead of "O man," let’s insert "O America."

This quotation from Micah (thanks Gary, I always knew the passage but forgot the author) is perhaps my favorite of all of the Prophets (and there are a lot of great ones); perhaps my favorite in the entire Tanach (Bible).  That quotation tells you all you need to know about how to live well and how to be a good human being.

Iranian Mullahs’ Vain Attempt to Put the Cyber Genie Back in Bottle

Monday, November 8th, 2004

The New York Times periodically delights and shocks me with the totalitarian antics of those wacky Iranian mullahs.  They give theocracy a very bad name by creating a particularly bad form of it.  The paper did it again today with a story (Iran Jails More Journalists and Blocks Web Sites) about the jailing of journalists and closing of hundreds of Iranian internet sites and blogs which advocate democracy.Mahmoud Shahrudi--Iran's chief justice

Jonathan Swift, the greatest literary satirist who ever lived, would’ve adored this statement from those guardians of all decency:

"The judiciary is drafting a law that will define cybercrimes. The chief of the judiciary, Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi, has said the law will define the punishment for ‘anyone who disseminates information aimed at disturbing the public mind through computer systems.’"

"Disturbing the public mind through computer systems."  Hmmm.  I can’t think of a much better definition of what good blogs should do, can you?

For the latest on this situation read this article at Reporters Without BordersCentral Asian & Southern Caucasian Freedom of Expression Network published the Human Rights Watch press release which gives quite a bit of detail about this Iranian internet/free press crisis.

Wanted: Comprehensive World Music Song Download Site

Sunday, November 7th, 2004

If you’re like me and love world music, then you’re likely disappointed by almost all the current online song download services like iTunes.  Finding even the most common world music songs on these sites is a hit or miss proposition.

Some are trying to fill the niche like Calabash Music, which offers a free song download each day.  You can learn more about the songs and the artists from their Free Song a Day blog.  Calabash also has a paid service with songs costing as low as 50 cents.  But the problem with Calabash is that they have a limited selection of material, essentially artists with which they have relationships.  There are some headliners and international stars, but the roster is filled with younger and lesser known acts.  Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying these artists aren’t compelling or worthwhile.  Just not quite what I’m looking for.

What I’m looking for is an iTunes for world music.  A service that licenses every world music title and serves as a compendium for the world music community.  In my world music mp3blog I’d love to have such a resource, rather than having to scrounge around the internet for songs I’d love to feature, but don’t own myself.  You’d think that some enterprising person somewhere in the world would’ve thought of this as a viable business model.  If I had the technical know how and capital to put this together, I’d sure take a stab at it.  As it is, I don’t have either.  So I can only hope…

When American Troops Are All ‘Jews’ to Iraqis…Look Out!

Sunday, November 7th, 2004

I don’t have much use for Tom Friedman as I’ve stated here before.  While I know he has his heart in the right place, he’s too fixated on entering the pantheon of great foreign policy columnists–Scotty Reston, Walter Lippman, etc.–to write solidly, simply and realistically about the Mideast.  I almost never learn anything new from him on the few occasions when I do read him.  I learn what Tom thinks, what Tom knows, who Tom’s met, to whom he’s writing imaginary letters.  But that’s not the same as learning something you didn’t know before or seeing a perspective you hadn’t considered previously.

But thanks to Israel Policy Forum’s M.J. Rosenberg writing in No More Excuses, I have learned something shocking and revelatory about the remarkable hole we Americans are in in Iraq.  Rosenberg quotes Friedman’s Jews, Israel and America in the October 24th edition of the New York Times:

Scott [Pelley of 60 Minutes] had gone around and asked Iraqis on the streets what they called American troops – wondering if they had nicknames for us in the way we used to call the Nazis "Krauts" or the Vietcong "Charlie." And what did he find? "Many Iraqis have so much distrust for U.S. forces we found they’ve come up with a nickname for our troops," Scott said. "They call American soldiers ‘The Jews,’ as in, ‘Don’t go down that street, the Jews set up a roadblock.’"

The combination of anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism inherent in that Iraqi colloquialism is a truly toxic cocktail which will lead to enormous future misery for Israel and the U.S.

What this means is that it is even more imperative than ever for George Bush to crack heads if he has to in order to get the Israelis and Palestinians talking seriously about making peace.  If Bush doesn’t negotiate most of a final status agreement before his term ends then he will earn the ultimate opprobrium of history and those on both sides who will have lost their lives due to his lethargy.  And if Bush surprises me and achieves what now looks impossible?  What then?  I don’t relish saying nasty things about Bush and Sharon.  I’d love to be proven wrong.  Please, prove me wrong.  But as I said in my previous post about Mahmoud Abbas and Israel’s golden opportunity for peace: "Just give me peace.  I don’t care who achieves it."

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE