You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Arafat: Why Did He Die?”.
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Arafat: Why Did He Die?”.
Richard — In light of all the mystery surrounding Arafat’s death, I don’t find your speculations particularly ghoulish. For me, though, the mystery lies just as much in the timing of his death as the nature of the illness that killed him. If he contracted AIDs from volitional sexual behavior, it seems to have brought him down at a propitious time. I’m leaning toward the poisoning theories myself, but there’s nothing to say he couldn’t have contracted AIDs through a deliberately contaminated blood transfusion or other method. It would be a particularly diabolical method of assassination that might insure the murder never would be publicly exposed or investigated.
Now that I’m sharing my own speculations I do feel a bit ghoulish. It’s just that the circumstances seem so odd . . .
Actually, he may have died of cirrhosis of the liver.
That would explain the secrecy too…
Richard — And yet, with help from David Frum’s Diary at National Review, the AIDS theory wends its way through the press . . .
http://tinyurl.com/7xbpr
With all the liver stuff, it might have been hepatitis C, too. C can be spread via sexual contact and is very destructive to the liver.
Since he was seeing liver specialists, cirrhosis might have been a less explosive answer. And his terrible coloring and weight loss are consistent with some sort of liver thing.