Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Stupid Quote About Blogging of the Week

Jul 31st, 2004 by Richard Silverstein | 0

“I think that bloggers have put the issue of professionalism under attack,” said Thomas McPhail, professor of media studies at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, who argues that journalists should be professionally credentialed. “They have no pretense to objectivity. They don’t cover both sides.”

How much stupidity and ignorance has been spouted about blogging by those who either don’t understand it or fear it or both? A great deal.

This quotation comes from Jennifer Lee’s Web Diarists Are Now Official Members of Convention Press Corps in the New York Times. She was writing about the new phenomenon of bloggers covering a national political convention.

blogging at the democratic convention

Blogging at the Democratic National Convention (credit: Mario Tama/Getty Images)

To the Times’ credit, it does seem to be “getting it” about blogging. There have been two articles about bloggers at the Convention. The second is Blogged in Boston: Politics Gets an Unruly Spin. For a change, the writers of these articles didn’t introduce any condescension into their pieces though Lee did allow Professor McPhail to spout off in a clueless sort of way.

Getting back to the good professor’s comment about bloggers being unprofessional and lacking in objectivity: since when are these virtues so holy? What would he have to say about journalists who covered political conventions in the old days before there were journalism schools or so-called high journalistic standards of objectivity? Is the quality of journalism today so much better than in the past for all the professionalism and objectivity that now supposedly characterizes it?

In addition, I don’t think most bloggers at this Convention made any pretense they were professional journalists. There certainly were journalists at the event who blogged. But most bloggers there were probably not journalists. Does McPhail think that blog readers will be confused–when they read a tendentious, partisan blog–into thinking that the blog is objective? If so, he gives our readers so little credit for intelligence.

Happily the success and prevalence of blogging in our society (and in our political life) will not be dependent on the ignorant comments of people like McPhail. Jay Rosen in PressThink gives us further trash talk from the good professor about blogging.

Leave a Reply