Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for April, 2004

Bush and Sharon: Birds of a Feather

Friday, April 16th, 2004
sharon_bush.jpg

Fat Man and Little Boy (credit:
Stephen Crowley/New York Times)

After reading about George Bush’s cave-in to Ariel Sharon in their Washington meeting this week, I was horrified to think that over fifty years of U.S. and UN policy and resolutions were being thrown out the window. While all parties to the conflict have tacitly recognized that the points Bush agreed to (end of Right of Return and Israeli retention of some West Bank settlements) would be included in an eventual peace agreement, none of the parties has, until now, had the temerity to announce BEFORE negotiations what the other side must give up. In other words, practically everyone knew that Palestinians would give up the Law of Return and that Israel would exchange West Banks settlements for other Israeli-held lands. But never before have these positions been conceded BEFORE negoations even begin. This is a terrible development and precedent. It is as if the judge (in this case, Bush) in a major criminal case met beforehand with the prosecutor (Sharon) and agreed on behalf of the defendant that he would serve ten years in prison for his crime. If this scenario sounds bizarre in a legal context, it is even more so in the arena of intenational relations.

Or imagine, if you will, that after fighting the War of 1812, Britain and Canada jointly agreed (and without US consultation) that New York would be annexed to Canada. No doubt, American patriots would’ve been on the warpath to prevent such a national humiliation. Should we doubt that Palestinians will do the same?

Though no doubt some historian will point out my error, I can’t remember a previous instance in which one party to international conflict ignored the opponent, refused to negotiate and imposed its view of things by force of might. The Palestinian response to this charade will undoubtedly come in blood and tears on the streets of Israel’s cities. After the assassination of Sheik Yassin, it is a wonder that the response has not come already. But the only sure thing is that vengeance will be wrought. That will be the Palestinian answer to Bush and Sharon’s White House Punch & Judy show.

Before I continue with this line of thought, I must say that Israeli withdrawal from Gaza is an undoubtedly good thing. It advances the possitiility of peace by removing one more obstacle in the way of future agreement. No matter what his motives, Sharon deserves credit for formulating this plan and pursuing its implementation against an array of right-wing pressure groups and members of his own Cabinet.

It seems to me that James Bennet in Sharon Coup: U.S. Go-Ahead got it slightly wrong. This may apprear to be a coup for the Israelis. But there is less there than meets the eye. Sharon undoubtedly got most of what he wanted and the Palestinians are more aggrieved than ever. So in that sense, the Bush concession is a “coup” of sorts. Sharon and most Israelis certainly see it that way:

Israel’s largest daily newspaper headlined its main news story “Sharon Got It All.” Speaking of the Palestinians, Mr. Sharon told the newspaper, “They were dealt a lethal blow.”

But I maintain that such delusionary thinking will only bring added suffering for both Israelis and Palestinians. In a war, you can never in the end bring peace without including your enemy in the process. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is no exception. Bush and Sharon can jabber all they want and agree to whatever they want. But it all “doesn’t amount to a hill of beans in this world” without direct Palestinian participation and agreement. As Bennet posits:

For Israel, the risk is that the Palestinians will now reject as imposed on them any peace plan along the lines Mr. Bush laid out, in his White House statement and a letter he gave Mr. Sharon. For the United States, the risk is that, with Arabs and Muslims already suspicious of American motives, the Bush administration will be seen as teaming with Israel to void Palestinian rights.

It must be noted that there is no “risk” of Palestinian rejection or deepening Arab mistrust of America; both of these are a certainty.

The member States of the European Union who opposed the Bush declaration and tried to talk him out of issuing it should be commended. Again as with Iraq, Bush refused to listen to the wise counsel of Europe. Again as in Iraq, he will learn his lesson.

I think that it’s no accident that this statement comes from two leaders who face political turmoil at home. If Sharon is indicted by Israeli authorities, he will probably no longer be Prime Minister. And if Iraq and the economy continue heading south, George Bush may no longer be President. So the Bush-Sharon agreement appears a Hail Mary pass attempting to pump a little air into their flagging political fortunes. As with many another Hail Mary pass, this one will fall incomplete.

George Bush on Iraq: “No Regrets”

Thursday, April 15th, 2004
bush_press_conference.jpg

“‘Je ne regret rien.’ Damn, gotta stop thinking in Frog!!”
(credit: Reuters/Larry Downing)

One of the journalists on Charlie Rose’s panel discussing the President’s Iraq/9-11 news conference yesterday said Bush was asked at least five times whether he regretted any of his actions or decisions regarding 9/11. His first thought before he held himself in check was Edith Piaf’s memorable: “Je ne regret rien.” He must’ve learned this bit of Frog on one of his Continental finishing tours with Barbara. But he realized just in time it would be a betrayal of his manliness to quote the language of Chirac, his mortal enemy.

Bush’s expression in this photo is priceless. The cluelessness, the pursed lip and furrowed brow, the deer caught in the headlights stare says it all. Apparently George never makes mistakes or so he’d have the American people believe.

Israel through the Eyes of Contemporary Singer-Songwriters: Steve Earle and Rosanne Cash

Tuesday, April 13th, 2004

Israel holds a deep place in the Jewish psyche. But few non-Israeli songwriters seem to write about Israel (gospel and spirituals are a different story of course). But here are two profound songs written within the last decade by two of the great American songwriters: Jerusalem by Steve Earle and The Western Wall by Rosanne Cash. Jerusalem takes on the current stalemate in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict (That I believe that one fine day all the children of Abraham/ Will lay down their swords forever in Jerusalem) while Western Wall focuses on the spiritual symbolism of Jerusalem’s Kotel Ha-Maaravi (“western wall”): It’s a crumblin’ pile of broken stones/ It ain’t much but it might be home/ If I ever loved a place at all/ It’s the Western Wall.western_wall.jpg

Jerusalem (hear it here)
(Steve Earle)

I woke up this mornin’ and none of the news was good
And death machines were rumblin’ ‘cross the ground where Jesus stood
And the man on my TV told me that it had always been that way
And there was nothin’ anyone could do or say

And I almost listened to him
Yeah, I almost lost my mind
Then I regained my senses again
And looked into my heart to find

That I believe that one fine day all the children of Abraham
Will lay down their swords forever in Jerusalem

Well maybe I’m only dreamin’ and maybe I’m just a fool
But I don’t remember learnin’ how to hate in Sunday school
But somewhere along the way I strayed and I never looked back again
But I still find some comfort now and then

Then the storm comes rumblin’ in
And I can’t lay me down
And the drums are drummin’ again
And I can’t stand the sound

But I believe there’ll come a day when the lion and the lamb
Will lie down in peace together in Jerusalem

And there’ll be no barricades then
There’ll be no wire or walls
And we can wash all this blood from our hands
And all this hatred from our souls

And I believe that on that day all the children of Abraham
Will lay down their swords forever in Jerusalem

This song appears on Jerusalem (2002). Lyrics provided by The Original Unofficial Steve Earle Site.

Western Wall (hear it here)
(Rosanne Cash)

I stand here by the Western Wall,
Baby, look at that wall, standin’ silent an’ tall.
An’ I shove my prayers in the cracks.
Got nothin’ to lose, no-one to answer back.
All these years I’ve brought up for review,
Wasn’t taught this but I learned somethin’ new.
Had to answer a distant call,
At the Western Wall.

An’ I’ve got a heart full of fear,
An’ I offer it up on this altar of tears.
Red dust settles deep in my skin.
Don’t know where it starts or where I begin.
It’s a crumblin’ pile of broken stones;
It ain’t much but it might be home.
If I ever loved a place at all,
It’s the Western Wall.

Instrumental break.

I don’t know if God was ever a man,
But if She was, I think I understand.
Why he found a place to break his fall,
Near the Western Wall.

The song appeared on Ten Song Demo (1996). Lyrics provided by Coquet-Shack.

WARNING: This mp3 blog exists to spread the wonder and genius that is traditional music. It does NOT exist to enhance your private mp3 collection. So by all means come, listen, enjoy, then follow the links to buy the music. If you come, listen, download, then leave—you’re violating the spirit behind this blog and doing nothing to support the artists featured here. And if you link to my mp3 file at your own site, then you’re stealing my bandwidth and being pretty uncool. So please don’t do it.

First We Take Manhattan: We Visit New York City and Have a Baby!

Monday, April 12th, 2004

How many nights I prayed for this, to let my work begin
First we take Manhattan…

First We Take Manhattan, Leonard Cohen

I took a long enforced hiatus from my blog at the end of March because we left for New York City on March 23rd and didn’t return till April 2nd. It’s amazing what not blogging does to your blog hits. My visitor stats declined by half to one-third. I’m hoping that in resuming my blogging eventually I’ll get back to my previous level.

We had a mixed trip. While we accomplished all of our major personal and business objectives, we had to stay three more days than planned and that took a lot out of all of us. It was a drag to be forced to stay in New York so much longer. We were so glad to return home when we did.

Normally, we stay at the Brooklyn Marriott, whose staff is among the most responsive and attentive of any New York hotel I’ve ever stayed at. We just love this hotel. It’s near Jonah’s cousin, Sam. It’s near some great restaurants in Cobble Hill and Smith Street. And finally, it’s near the Promenade, Prospect Park and the Brooklyn Museum. How cool can you get?

However, as Jonah gets bigger, we decided that we need to stay in a suite hotel in order to give Jonah his own room. It’s such a drag (as it was at the Brooklyn Marriott) for Janis and me to have to sit on the bathroom floor until Jonah falls asleep because we’re all sleeping together in one room.

So we located the Battery Park Embassy Suites Hotel opposite the World Financial Center. It’s a very nice facility and the harbor view of the Jersey City skyline from our hotel window was superb.

jersey_city_office_building_tp.jpg

Jersey City office building gleams at twilight

jersey_city_skyline_from_embassy_suites_tp.jpg

Jersey City skyline from Embassy Suites 14th floor

jersey_city_skyline_sunset_tp.jpg

Jersey City skyline before sunset

ny_waterway_ferry_from_hotel_window_tp.jpg

New York Waterway ferry
at Battery Park terminal

The price is reasonable and you get a decent amount of space plus that wonderful extra room for the kid. There is also a splendid playground and pond at the riverfront just outside the hotel. But the hotel staff often seemed clueless. Whenever I either called or visited the Concierge desk, the concierge wasn’t available.

But there was one shining staff exception: the doorman, Willie, befriended my son in a big way and that made all the difference both for Jonah and us, his parents. Willie is a big, tall guy with a wonderful smile and hearty laugh. Whenever he saw Jonah he bounded over to him, gave him a big laugh and said: “Here’s my boy. I just love this kid.” If only Embassy Suites could teach the rest of their staff that sort of attitude toward their customers!

Another big minus for kids and parents is that the hotel does not have its own in-house restaurant (but it does have good room service). While there are several independent chain restaurants in the building, none are very good. The selection is also meager across the street at the World Financial Center. You can either eat fast food or tremendously expensive luxury food (Hudson River Club). In order to find the type of restaurants that we liked you had to walk 5-6 blocks to Tribeca. Doesn’t sound like a long walk, but when you’re with a toddler whom you’ll invariably have to carry at least part of the way; and when you must cross West Street (the West Side Highway downtown extension) as part of the bargain–then every trip can be long and exhausting.

And finally the worst thing about the Embassy Suites was the hotel maid who stole my wedding ring from the bedside table. At the Marriott and other hotels, I’ve sometimes accidentally left my wedding ring in the hotel room and I’ve never had a problem. Apparerently, the Embassy Suites has a serious security deficiency and does not hire reliable staff. While we might stay at this hotel again (simply because we don’t know of other good quality suite hotels like it there), if you do you should be aware of the light-fingered housecleaning staff.

We enjoyed two excellent meals: one was at Vine Restaurant in the Financial District and the other at the Duane Park Cafe in lower Tribeca. I highly recommend both places but Duane Park is especially lovely with a quiet, elegant, but informal atmosphere and wonderfully inventive, fresh food.duane_park_cafe.jpg

We found New York to be a tough town for kids. Yes, there are nice attractions for children. But getting to and from them by subway or walking can be tremendously exhausting. In fact, whenever I returned from a day in town with Jonah I felt beat. Unlike Seattle, where you can drive with your child to a park, beach or museum and save your exertion for your destination–in New York you have to exhaust yourself getting to and from your destination as well.

Each day, with Janis’ helpful suggestion I took Jonah to a different interesting child-friendly venue. We went to Central Park Zoo (a hit though it is a small zoo), the circus (another hit though the music is deafening), the Children’s Museum of Manhattan (a big yawn–Seattle’s Children’s Museum is far superior), the Liberty (N.J.) Science Center (a huge hit), the Times Square Toys ‘R Us (a great Ferris wheel and Thomas train track), Central Park carousel and Museum of Natural History (possibly the greatest museum of its kind in the world).

New York is undoubtedly a big, sprawling, brawling place, full of dirt, noise and excitement. While some New Yorkers were very nice and kind to Jonah (like on the subway), there were so many surly, taciturn and just plain odd interactions with New Yorkers that they well-earned their reputation for disdain or indifference toward their fellow human beings.

New York seems clueless when it comes to accomodating the needs of children. Why do New York City restaurants not realize that they need booster seats for children? We ate out ten times during our stay and only two restaurants had booster seats. In Seattle, EVERY restaurant we’ve ever brought Jonah to has had a booster seat. Why do New York City waiters think that a high chair will work for every child regardless of size or age? Which brings me to another critique of New York City life: it’s not for kids. New York is designed for and by adults. Those adults don’t spend much time thinking about how to make the place suitable for children. Children seem pretty much an afterthought. They just have to muddle their way through city life.

I don’t feel the same about Seattle. This is a great town to raise children in. Restaurants, businesses and city government agencies all go a long way to try to satisfy the needs of parents and children.

Jonah and I felt hyperstimulated by 11 days in the Big Apple. We were happy to finally return to the relative calm and tranquility of Seattle.

The main reason for our visit was to perform an egg donor procedure at NYU Medical Center so that Janis and I could have our second baby. Jonah was conceived in the same way three years ago by Dr. Jamie Grifo and the NYU Fertility Clinic. See this post about Jamie’s extraordinary work, The Infertility Scourge and the Nuclear Transfer Dream. It took much soul searching, but we decided several months ago to try to have a second and the embryo was implanted on April 1st.

Going through the endless injections, early morning sperm retrievals, pregnancy tests, etc. makes one realize how wonderful and miraculous natural conception is. But it is still worth all the trouble for the outcome: a wonderful child of one’s own.

Jonah and I waited in the Clinic reception area while the fertility staff performed the embryo implantation procedure. Here’s yet another idiotic anti-child directive: the Clinic will not allow children to accompany their mother into the room where implantation occurs. Here you have a child who’s expelled from the company of his mother when he most needs to be near her to be reassured by her–and he can’t see her. The supposed reason: it’s for their own good. The Clinic fears that children might touch a needle or some other piece of equipment that might harm them. Sorry, but I just don’t buy it. If you’re in the business of helping people have children and you can’t accomodate properly the needs of those children (many of which were created in this very facility) then you’re doing a poor job both for the parents who are your patients and for their children.

Minding Jonah while waiting was a surreal and intense experience. I told Jonah that the doctor was putting an egg inside mommy’s tummy so we might have a second child like him. I don’t know how much of this he grasped though he did repeat the words to me. But I think in some innate way he comprehended and was either terrified or tremendously agitated. His play during the wait was incredibly focussed and intense. He repetitively and continuously approached the clinic door behind which Janis had disappeared saying: “Want to go in dere” or “Mommy in dere.” It was all I could do to prevent him from barging right in. In 75 minutes, he must’ve repeated these phrases 75 or 100 times! By the end I was emotionally drained. Since our return from New York, Jonah seems to have forgotten all his toilet training and refused this past weekend to take any naps (a horrible experience for his parents). So we know he’s absorbing some of this information. But we don’t know why (though you hear about this type of regressive behavior in this situation all the time) it’s having such a strong negative impact on him.

As I wrote the above paragraph, I began to understand why Jonah is so terrified of the future: we haven’t done enough to reassure him and make him understand how special he is to us and tell him that we’ll always love him dearly even when the new baby comes. Jonah is amazingly receptive and responsive to such talks. And I’m sure when we talk to him tonight, this will make him feel more secure about what lies in store.

Though you may’ve already read this between the lines above, Janis had a pregnancy test yesterday and she is indeed pregnant! I’m overjoyed. She’s apprehensive (especially of the possibility of twins which is about 30% when two embryos are implanted). I’m hoping that she’ll gradually grow into the news and feel as joyful as I.

Bush’s Excuse for Failing to Stop 9/11: “But Nobody Told Me, Honest!”

Monday, April 12th, 2004

The New York Times reports today in Bush Says Brief on Al Qaeda Threat Was Not Specific that Bush repeated for what seems like the 100th time his ridiculous apologia for his failure to detect the Al Qaeda 9/11 attack:

“I am satisfied that I never saw any intelligence that indicated there was going to be an attack on America — at a time and a place, an attack,” Mr. Bush said after attending Easter services in Fort Hood, Tex. “Of course we knew that America was hated by Osama bin Laden. That was obvious. The question was, who was going to attack us, when and where, and with what.”

I hope I’m not the only one to label this for what it is: a pathetic, self-serving and useless excuse. Here’s the type of Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) on August 6, 2001, which would’ve caused George to ‘move heaven and earth’ (to use George’s hackneyed phrase):

Condi Rice: Mr. President, I have here your daily briefing materials. I refer you to the title of today briefing: “Osama’s Coming on 9/11.” Looks like Al Qaeda plans to hijack four planes taking off in New York City and Boston and plans to fly them into the two World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon and the White House. We understand these attacks will take place on September 11, 2001. Whadya think we should do?”

Gee, wouldn’t it be nice if every terrorist warning could be that specific. But how many are? So George means to tell us that a PDB entitled Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States isn’t specific enough for him to take urgent action to protect our shores? Give me a break! And this guy wants us, the American people to give him another four years? He screwed up on 9/11, he’s screwed up Iraq, if he’d devoted any serious effort to it he would’ve screwed up the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he’s screwed up the economy–imagine what more he can screw up with another four years!

The Iraq Quagmire: Time to End It Now

Friday, April 9th, 2004

I wanted to write this post after the bestial attack in Falluja last week which killed four U.S. security guards. But I was away in New York and didn’t get any time to write until now. Sorry to say, but subsequent events have borne out what my predictions for the future would have been after the horrible Fallujah ambush: a widening crescendo of violence against the Occupation.

fallujah lynching

Carousing mob celebrates
ambush and slaughter of four
U.S. security guards
(credit: AP)

The drumbeat of headlines in the New York Times tell the whole sordid story of ever intensifying and unified Iraqi opposition to American occupation: Americans Are Jolted By Gruesome Reminders Of the Day in Mogadishu (April 1); 7 U.S. Soldiers Die in Iraq as a Shiite Militia Rises Up (April 5); 12 Marines Die in Raid as Fierce Fighting With Sunnis and Shiites Spreads to 6 Iraqi Cities (April 7); Iraq Uprising Spreads (April 8); Marines Battle Insurgents in Streets of Falluja (April 9)

The U.S. cannot win this fight. There are 30 million people in Iraq. While not all 30 million want us out, the tide is turning against us and soon–if events continue to spiral out of control–there will be a raging minority, if not majority, who will be demanding that we leave. Of course, we shouldn’t have gone in to begin with and we shouldn’t have even stayed this long. But the key point now is to get out before a tide of blood sweeps the entire countryside and swallows us with it.

iraq attack

Supporters of Shiite firebrand cleric
Al Sadr celebrate as flames engulf Army truck
in Baghdad
(credit: Reuters)

The New York Times reports in Signs That Shiites and Sunnis Are Joining to Battle Americans that Sunnis and Shias are making commong cause in their fight against the U.S. While this is certainly shocking and almost unbelievable considering the level of hostility between the two groups–there is nothing for us to brag about in finally making mutual allies of two ethnic groups who’ve never seen eye to eye on any significant issue before.

I say we will have to withdraw and unfortunately leave the Iraqis to their own devices. The Arabs seems to have a habit, as Abba Eban used to say of the Palestinians to “never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.” And this will certainly be the case if we withdraw and an interethnic bloodbath (Shias against Sunnis, Kurds against Sunnis, etc.) ensues (how can it not?). I don’t know whether it’s pride, nationalism or a sense of deep inferiority that causes them to turn their backs on opportunities that knock on their door. But they are in the process of doing this and our role cannot be to force down their throats a solution they reject.

That being said, the longer Bush stays in Iraq the bloodier the headlines and the worse his chances come November. While Bush is a shrewd and wily politician, his stubborn streak may compel him to draw this agony out far past the breaking point. Many greater men than he have allowed such hubris to bring ruination upon themselves, their friends and allies. Perhaps Bush will be yet another example. I wish no man or woman’s blood spilled over this useless war. But I would grasp hold of almost any opportunity to rid this nation of George Bush and his cronies.

Ford’s Escape Hybrid SUV and Sham “Green” Marketing Campaign

Wednesday, April 7th, 2004
Ford_escape_hybrid

Ford Escape Hybrid SUV–example of sham green marketing? (credit: Fordvehicles.com)

I periodically do blog posts about corporate advertising campaigns that are particularly smarmy, hypocritical and self-serving. Now, Ford Motor Company has entered my marketing Hall of Shame. The company has rolled out its new “green” Escape Hybrid SUV and it’s yelling from the rooftops how great it is. In the New York Times, April 7, 2004, (pages C12-13), it trumpets this ad text (please excuse the poor quality scan):

ford_escape_ad.jpg

What kind of environmentally aware consumer believes that by driving their SUV into a previously remote or inaccessible backcountry site that they’re helping to preserve it?? The very act of driving to such locations helps to destroy–not preserve–them.

I haven’t been able to find this ad anywhere on the internet so I’ll quote the ad copy here (if anyone knows how I can locate an online version of this ad, please send me an e mail):

Introducing Earth’s first hybrid SUV. As the first and only gas/electric SUV, the Escape Hybrid compromises nothing…[It] deliver[s] engine performance that makes it the most fuel-efficient SUV ever…Which means that this SUV, by nature, is kinder and gentler on nature. Greener vehicles. Cleaner factories. It’s the right road for our company…

So let’s examine what’s problematic about this text. Who believes that the new hybrid SUV “compromises nothing?” If you do, I’m afraid you’re being quite gullible.

What can we say that’s positive about this new product? Well, it’s better than the hundreds of thousands, if not millions of the gas guzzling behemoths that constitute the bulk of Ford’s SUV/truck sales and profits.

But how many of these “green” SUVs will be sold compared to the gas guzzlers? 100? 1,000? What good is the Escape Hybrid’s being “the cleanest SUV ever” when the vast majority of Ford SUV sales will continue to be some of the most environmentally damaging (not to mention dangerous) vehicles on the road? What kind of “green” statement is the company really making? Ford wants to take credit for being “green” by selling a handful of environmentally “friendly” vehicles, while overlooking the fact that its other vehicles completely obliterate any environemental benefit provided by the new Escape Hybrid.

Anyone planning to buy this sucker will be helping to validate Ford’s self-serving “green” marketing campaign and sticking a undeserved feather into the company’s environmental cap. And whatever you do, if you buy it don’t follow the stupid advice of the ad slogan by taking to into the remote back country and helping to ruin previously unspoiled vistas.

In addition, Henry Clay Ford announced with great fanfare a few years ago that Ford was improving fuel efficiency for its SUVs by 25%, only to withdraw this statement shortly afterward. So where’s the much-vaunted Ford commitment to environmentalism? I guess it just went up in smoke. I don’t think this commitment is worth the paper the press release is printed on.

For more Ford smarminess and environmentally conscious marketing, visit its Environmental Initiatives site. Geoffrey Johnson of The Green Life has written a very sharp analysis of the Ford marketing campaign in his ‘Greenwashing’ Leaves a Stain of Distortion.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE