Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for April, 2004

An Arab Land (1950): Natan Alterman

Sunday, April 25th, 2004

alterman_record_cover

Natan Alterman pictured on a record cover
for his Magash Hakesef (“On a Silver Platter”)

(credit: Israeliscent.com)

Palestine is an Arab land. Strangers have no share in it.
–a public broadsheet

A clear night. Trees wave
Their boughs in an airy whisper.
From above, Arab night stars
Sparkle over an Arab land.

The night-stars sparkle and blink
Sowing their trembling light
Upon the quiet city, El Kuds,
Where King Daoud dwells.

From there, they gaze
To the far-off city, El-Chalil,
The city where Father Ibrahim is buried–
Ibrahim who bore Ischak.

From there, their sharp line of light
Hastens to paint with radiance
The waters of the river, El-Urdun
Which Yakub with his crook crossed over.

A clear night. With an airy wink
Night-stars sparkle as is their custom
Upon the Arab hills
Which Musa saw from afar.

When I first read this poem, while studying Hebrew Literature at the Hebrew University in 1979, I was attracted by its knowing and bitter use of irony in satirizing the Palestinian sense that they merited exclusive proprietary ownership of Israel. While within the poem, Alterman savagely satirizes Palestinian exclusivist nationalism; he indirectly causes us to examine the same ugly phenomenon among Zionist exclusivists. In the current Israeli political debate, the 40% of Israelis who support population transfer (read ‘ethnic cleansing’) should rightly be called exclusivist.

The beauty of the poem is that it makes us realize that claims of exclusive “ownership” of the land by either side are preposterous. Though it takes a sixty year old poem to remind us of this, we can never hear the message often enough.

With the Setting of the Sun: Chaim Nachman Bialik

Sunday, April 25th, 2004

At the setting of the sun, approach my window,
Embrace me,
Hold fast to my neck, put your head on mine,
And so cling fast to me.

As we cling closely, we silently lift our eyes
To the terrible radiance.
We will set all our hearts’ yearnings free
On the seas of light.

They will rise up to the heavens, a yearning flight of doves.
In the distance they will sail and become lost;
And upon the purple mountain tops–radiant red islands–
They will fall in silent flight.

They are the distant islands, the elevated worlds
Which we saw in dreams;
Which made us strangers under the heavens
And our lives–into Hell.

They are the islands of gold for which we have thirsted
As for a native land;
And which the night stars shadowed forth
With a flickering beam of light.

Upon them we remain, friendless and alone,
Like two flowers in the wilderness;
Like two stray souls seeking something lost for all eternity
In a strange land.

First You’re Pregnant, Then You’re Not, Then You Are Again!

Saturday, April 24th, 2004

“First there is a mountain,
Then there is no mountain,
Then there is…”

Juanita, Donovan

You read lots of horror stories in the newspapers about doctors operating on the wrong kidney or the wrong side of the brain. Last week, Janis and I had our own mini-horror story to contend with thanks to a lab technician at Pacific Gynecology here in Seattle.

You may have read an earlier post here (First We Take Manhattan: We Visit New York City and Have a Baby!) which recounted our success in an egg donor procedure which concluded with Janis getting pregnant last month. NYU asks Janis to go in each week for an HCG level test to ensure she’s still pregnant. Last Monday, a few hours after Janis took the test Dr. Hickock’s nurse called to tell me that Janis’ level was “under 1.0.” I asked her what this meant. She asked if Janis had had any blood in her urine or cramps or any other discomfort to which I replied, “No.” Then she said, “then that’s strange because this level indicates she’s not pregnant.” I was dumbfounded and VERY upset. The nurse asked me if I wanted the results tested again. I, of course, said “Yes.”

Then I had the happy task of informing Janis that she’d miscarried. I don’t even want to go into how hard this was and how confused and shocked we both were. Then, I called a few good friends who I turn to during my hours of trouble to tell them the horrible news.

When Janis returned home from work that night, she cried both for the loss of the baby and because she knew how important this second pregnancy was to me. Though we mourned in our way, it was hard to know how to feel about a fetus which aborts after only a month’s gestation. It didn’t feel like we’d lost a child (though thankfully I haven’t known such pain myself). In fact, I remember saying to myself: “The loss of this fetus does not feel the same as the loss of a life. And those on the right side of the abortion debate who contend that a fetus is the same as a life are dead wrong. A one-month old fetus is the promise of life, but not life itself.” And there is a big difference between them. I’m not saying that the “promise of life” is less than life or somehow worth less. But they aren’t the same and those in the anti-abortion movement who tell you they are are dead wrong.

When we went to bed on Monday night we were terribly sad and depressed. Everything seemed lousy. But little did we know how much lousier things could get.

At 1:30 AM, a mere forty minutes after I went to bed, Janis and I woke up to a huge crashing sound in front of our house. After racing downstairs, and taking a few moments to get my wits about me and wake up out of a deep sleep I heard the deep, rumbling sound of an old car or truck with a very bad muffler “peeling out.” I realized that cold air was rushing into the house through a huge hole where the glass in our French door used to be. I immediately called 911. But since I didn’t know at the time that we’d been burglarized, the call was low priority and it took SPD 20 minutes to arrive. When Janis finally came downstairs with Jonah, she was the one who realized that our wallet and purse had been stolen (they’d been sitting near the front door–one of the biggest No-nos in burglary prevention). Needless to say, the patrol car that went looking for the burglars didn’t find them.

The police officer also located the 50 lb. rock on our living room floor which had made the terrible noise as it crashed into our French door. The force of the rock had severed the shutter from the door and gouged a large hole in our floor.

Then, at 2 AM we began the ‘welcome’ task of cancelling all of our credit cards, ATM cards, cell phone service (Janis’ cell phone had been in her purse), etc. That morning we’d begin the process of trying to recover our life.

So what did the thief earn from his haul? $150 cash!! The cards were cancelled, the cell phone disabled. He got nothing. And what’s the damage? We still don’t know but I’m guessing it will be in the many thousands. Now you know why your insurance rates go up.

I fell asleep around 4 AM that morning. Janis got about 2 hours sleep after the burglary.

At 9 AM that morning, Dr. Hickock’s nurse called to tell us that their lab tech had retested the lab sample and realized that “she’d tested the wrong assay” (whatever that means). She told me that the the lab tech had “come to her in tears” to tell her of the mistake (I should think so–but don’t ask me to feel much sympathy!). I told the nurse that I was horrified and deeply upset at the mistake and that I wanted her to bring this mistake to the attention of the medical staff who supervised the clinic’s lab.

A few days later, I called the clinic manager to continue this conversation. After leaving a message and not hearing from him for TWO DAYS I decided to call again. We finally spoke and I made clear how aghast I was with this wrong result. I said I wanted to know how the mistake occured, why it occured and what was being done to ensure it wouldn’t happen to Janis or their other patients again. When I offered to write a letter to this effect, he suggested I send an e mail which he’d share with the medical staff.

I don’t know about you, but I’d like to think that a medical instiitution that makes such a mistake would be on the phone immediately to the wronged patient in order to apologize and try to make things right. That didn’t happen here and I think it’s a shame. Needless to say, my confidence in the medical care provided by Pacific Gynecology and Dynacare has been shaken.

This incident reminds us of why we chose to leave Seattle for the egg donor procedure (which was performed by Dr. Jamie Grifo of NYU Medical Center). We just didn’t have confidence that a Seattle infertility clinic would have enough experience or a high enough success rate to justify doing the procedure here. I think our judgment has been more than validated both by the two successful pregnancies via NYU and our unhappy history with Pacific Gynecology.

But I really must end this post on a positive note. None of us was injured during the burglary. And Pacific Gynecology has just given us back our pregnancy. Life is becoming good once more.

U.S. Iraq War Dead: the Picture the Pentagon Didn’t Want You to See

Friday, April 23rd, 2004


coffinsThe Seattle Times ran this photo by Tami Silicio as the lead story of its April 18th edition (see pdf version), The Somber Task of Honoring the Fallen.

Since Sunday, both Silicio and her husband David Landry have been fired by Maytag Aircraft (see Woman loses her job over coffins photo), their employer for violating “corporate policy” (read “for getting Don Rumsfeld pissed as hell at our company”). While Silicio certainly doesn’t share my view of the war or my politics, I think she got a raw deal. What is thorougly inexplicable about the incident is why was she fired when a week earlier the Air Force itself opened the floodgates by releasing 330 images of Iraqi war dead arriving at Dover Air Force Base? If the Air Force can take a photo and release it to the American people, why can’t Tami Silicio?? I think we all owe her a round of thanks for sticking her neck out in an effort to honor the fallen dead.silicio

Tami Silicio (credit: Seattle Times)

What is also inexplicable about the Air Force release is why would a Pentagon that has clamped a lid of absolute secrecy on information and images of America’s war dead now release hundreds of hitherto forbidden images?

Let’s be clear, the Seattle Times is not one of America’s great newspapers. It isn’t especially courageous or progressive. But you do have to give them credit for having the journalistic sense to run with the photo and give it the play they did. They knew they’d take flack from the Pentagon brass (keep in mind that the Pacific Northwest is a BIG military hub).

Take Me Under Your Wings
Chaim Nachman Bialik

Friday, April 23rd, 2004

Hachnisayni Tachat Knafayich (Hebrew)

Take me under your wings,
Be mother and sister to me.
May your lap be a shelter for my head,
A nest for my desolate prayers.

At twilight, the time of compassion
Lean down and I will reveal to you a secret of my sorrows;
‘They say there is youth in the world…
Where is my Youth?’

Another mystery I will confess to you:
My soul is singed by flame;
‘They say there is love in the world–
Where is Love?’

The stars lied to me,
There was a dream–but it too is past;
Now I have nothing in the world–
Not a thing.

Take me under your wings,
Be mother and sister to me,
Be your lap a shelter for my head,
A nest for my desolate prayers.

This poem, as with many of Bialik’s finest works, recounts the desperate predicament of Russian Jews in the first decades of the 20th century as they faced savage pogroms, mass emigration, and privation. I found a deeply moving reference to this poem in a memorial account of Rabbi Abel of Dubossar (d. 1925):

I will never forget his visit to our house on Simchat Torah (holiday) 1921. As was typical of him, his conversation was sprinkled with wisdom and Torah. Suddenly he stopped talking and began to sing with a sweet voice Bialik”s “Hachnisini Tachat Knafayich” (Take Me under your wings). He sang with great emotion while hot tears fell from his eyes. We were startled by the depth of his soul. We sat like stone and could not move a muscle. We felt that this time the man had revealed the sense of suffering and tragedy that he felt so deeply but had kept hidden from everyone. Such a “Hachnisini” we never heard before nor in the days to come until this present time.

(All poetry translations on this site by Richard Silverstein)

Monsoon: Seattle Pan-Asian Cuisine

Tuesday, April 20th, 2004

MonsoonLast Tuesday night, my family was recuperating from two hard blows–a burglary/break-in the previous night and news that a medical lab had erroneously told my wife that she’d miscarried (when she hadn’t). We all thought it was time to get away from the house for a nice, easy, delicious meal in the neighborhood. I suggested Monsoon. My wife felt that our less than adverturesome three year old wouldn’t find much to eat there. But I persisted because I had a hankering for their cozy, informal cuisine. We’ve been eating at Monsoon almost since it opened. But a few years ago we found that they weren’t changing their menu often enough and that if you ate there too often enough you could become quite jaded with the offerings.

Monsoon is a Capitol Hill restaurant owned by Sophie and Eric Banh. While StarChefs.com describes the cuisine as “Vietnamese,” I think I’d call it Southeast Asia meets the Pacific Northwest. In 2002, Bon Appetit named it among the nation’s Best Neigborhood Restaurants. Check out this link for two of the Banh’s recipes.

So last night we returned after an absence of many months and the menu is not only new (from the last time we were there), but it shines. While several old standbys remain on the menu, much of it is new. We ordered asparagus soup with enoki & lobster. It came in a slightly viscous broth that was delicious. The lobster meat was wonderfully tender. We ordered soft noodles with wild mushrooms, green onion & duck egg. Another wonderful dish. The scallops over crunchy wild rice risotto were quite fine. My favorite style of scallop preparation is to saute them over very high heat. While they’d been prepared this way, they were then doused with a sauce which, while very tasty, caused the scallops to lose that crisp, slightly crunchy exterior texture that is so wonderful. The sticky wild rice risotto is a preparation I’ve never seen before and it was quite good. For dessert, I ordered bannana cake which was soaked in butter and perhaps a liqueur as well. It had a dark, slightly crusty exterior that gave it an unusual flavor. With such a banal dish as this, one needs to change it to relieve its ordinariness and the Banhs have done this well. There are many other dessert offerings which are new to me which I’ll have to return to savor.

I asked the waitress for a recommendation of a white wine and she suggested the Albert Mann Alsatian Pinot Blanc and it did not disappoint. It had a pleasing yellow gold glow and was smooth, complex, and neither too dry nor too sweet.

Our meal made us feel as if we’d become reacquainted with an old friend we hadn’t seen for years.

Monsoon Restaurant
615 19th Avenue East
Seattle, WA 98112
206.325.2111

Childrearing: From Pathos to Bathos in Seconds Flat

Saturday, April 17th, 2004
jonah_with_cookie_tp.jpg

Jonah holds one of his
favorite foodstuffs

A couple of today’s vignettes from life with Jonah (our 3 year old):

1. Nothing quite brings you down to earth (nor makes you more humble) than cleaning up your son’s throwup which he’s spewed in at least 14 different locations over 100 square feet or more (incuding my own glasses and face!)!! I guess, though, that if I were truly humble I wouldn’t even be telling you about my great sacrifice today for the greater family good. I’d just swallow my gut and go on.

In a way, I don’t deserve too much sympathy because I’m probably the culprit who gave the virus to both him and my wife (who’s sicker than both of us right now).

2. Jonah has a placemat at the dinner table which contains graphic representations of the numerals 1 to 10. At every meal, he points at one or more numbers and asks what it is. Tonight, he pointed at the number 10 and said: “Ut is dat?” (“what is that?”). “Ten,” I answered. Then he giggled: “At two nummahs!” (“That’s two numbers”) Then he really started to chuckle. Imagine my son wondering at the absurd (to a 3 year old) possibility that a single number (10) can consist of two numbers! Should I get ready his application to the Institute for Advanced Study, anyone (just kidding)?

The Rantisi Assassination:
How Can It Be Justified??

Saturday, April 17th, 2004

Recently, Yonatan Dror Bar-On of Dutchblog Israel e mailed a hearty mazel tov to me on my wife’s pregnancy (five weeks now!), which began an interesting personal exchange on various subjects which I hope will continue. He pointed me to a post he wrote about his daughter’s recent hospital visit to a Haifa area hospital for an infected finger.

While reading this post, I noted his post from today (April 17th) announcing Israel’s assassination of Abd el-’Aziz Rantisi, the Hamas chief leader (see the Haaretz story, Hamas leader Rantisi killed in IAF strike in Gaza City). Yonatan is, as I know him from his blog, a progressive who supports Israeli-Palestinian peace wholeheartedly and the Palestinian right to self-determination.

rantisi.jpg

Palestinians rage as rescuers attempt to free Rantisi’s body
from wreckage
(credit: AP)

So I was a little surprised and perplexed to read his justification for the assassination:

It must be quite frustrating to be an insurance agent for Hamas leaders these days. Abd el-’Aziz Rantisi has become the second ex-Hamas leader in less than a month. In contrast with the assassination of Ahmad Yassin, I have no serious problem with the timing or execution of this killing. No innocent people seem to have been killed or wounded (at least no foreign news agency reported such casualties, whereas if there is any collateral damage – I hate that expression – it is always mentioned right away). More than half an hour after the first reports I finally heard some Gazan doctor on the BBC talk about the “many, many women and children” who were supposed to be wounded or killed. Only hours before was an Israeli checkpoint attacked by a Hamas-Fatah terrorist, claiming the life of an Israeli Border-policeman.

Besides, Dr Rantisi was certainly not a frail man in a wheelchair, whose death had mainly a symbolic value. He fought a real short power struggle to receive the leadership of the terror organization, and he knew what he was getting into when he did that. I still wonder why it took so long for Israel’s security services to kill the man – after several political and military leaders had claimed before and after Yassin’s death that all terror leaders are potential targets for assasination -, but in the war against terror arresting or killing those responsible for acts of terorrism has proven effective in many ways.

Of course, all that does not relieve Sharon and his government of the obligation to try and find a true, more or less just and long-term solution to the conflict.

Aside from the macabre attempt at black-humor in the opening line (a characteristic of Israeli survivor/gallow’s humor), I couldn’t disagree more with his thinking on this subject.

I responded to Yonatan with these thoughts (some of which I expanded upon for this post):

I hadn’t heard about Rantisi’s killing until I’d read your post. I don’t disagree with you from a tactical perspective (he’s undoubtedly a murderous swine), but from an ethical & legal one. Perhaps the difference is that you’re on the front lines (in Israel) & I’m not but…how can we posit a future in which both peoples will live in peace & harmony & under the RULE OF LAW, when both sides and, almost to the same degree, flout both international law, their own local & national laws, and the basic laws of man?? Though some of my Orthodox brethren disagree, I don’t even find such a justification for extra-judicial, state-sponsored murder in our own halacha.

Certainly, there is a famous Talmudic passage which declares: Im ba l’hargecha, hashkem l’hargo,” “If one comes to kill you, rise up earlier [than he] to kill him.” In deference to George Bush’s justification of the Iraq War, we might call this dictum pre-emptive murder. [For a fuller halachi discussion of the meaning of this phrase in the context of modern terrorism, read the interesting, but troublesome discussion at the American Jewish Committee website, If Someone Comes to Kill You, Rise Up and Kill Him First.] Some of Israel’s most respected leaders including then Foreign Minister Shimon Peres have used this statement to justify killings like those of Yassein and Rantisi.

Perhaps not many may wish to engage in this halachic debate, but I would disagree with this interpretation of the Talmudic verse. In an e mail to an Orthodox American-Israeli friend who raised this passage as justification for an earlier such assassination, I wrote:

One might argue that the murdered militants intended to commit future murders & therefore their killing was justified. The IDF spokesperson argued just that & clearly felt no remorse whatsoever for the killing. I will never accept killing an unarmed man (no matter what his future intentions might be) as valid military policy. It is flat out immoral to me. I know you will argue that the Torah or Talmud permits us to murder those who intend to murder us. But I do not live by this law. What gives me the right to make this murderous judgment? A different Talmudic passage declares that when given a choice between murdering another or being murdered oneself, one must give up one’s own life. The statement concludes with a powerful moral: “Is your blood redder than his?” I do not think I could make the choice that Yonatan apparently can.

If a Palestinian schemes to kill an Israeli that certainly is a crime. But a conspiracy to commit murder does not rise to the level of permitting you to murder that person. If you do this then you become judge, jury and executioner. I would NEVER arrogate that right to myself.

While I understand that Israel feels it is acting in self-defense and only in response to great provocation, Israel is a State: as such a State has a deeper burden and faces greater constraints on State-sponsored behavior than non-State entities. If Sharon & his ilk would only allow the Palestinians their own State then I believe it would place much heavier legal, ethical & moral constraints on Palestinian behavior as well.

At any rate, what I mean to say is that Israel does not have to right to act in the way that the Stern Gang, Lehi or Etzel (pre-State Israeli terrorist gangs) acted pre-1948. And I see very little difference between Yitzhak Shamir & his thugs assassinating Count Bernadotte & the IDF assassinating Rantisi & Yassein. Well, of course there is some difference since Bernadotte was an internationally recognized diplomat and respected UN mediator while the Palestinians were both out & out thugs (but still respected, revered & admired within their political constituencies). But that makes little difference as to the meaning of the acts of assassination themselves. That in my opinion is treif, pasul & flat out wrong in both cases (Bernadotte & Yassein/Rantisi).

I also cannot understand how you can state that such assassinations have “been effective.” How do you measure “effective?” No doubt, you’ll point to the “lull” in lethal attacks since Yassein’s murder. But do you really believe that in the near to short term that such attacks WILL NOT occur and when they do, be spectacularly lethal to Israelis?? Please understand that I’m not saying that I wish this to happen or that it would cause me anything less than terrible pain to hear of it–but it seems almost an incontrovertible fact of nature that such killing will resume and resume with a vengeance. I hope I am wrong but know I am not.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE