≡ Menu

Ukrainian Newspaper Identifies Abusisi Kidnap Witness, Charges Deputy Intelligence Chief With Complicity

NOTE: After originally publishing this post, two Russian-speaking readers (thanks to Leonid Levin and another reader) provided a more precise translation of the Pravda article and I’ve expanded and updated it  accordingly.

The Ukrainian independent newspaper, Pravda published a major new story (Google Translate version) on the Abusisi kidnapping, in which it identified a new witness to the event who was was sleeping in the bunk just under the victim when he was snatched.  The witness, Andrej Makarenko, saw two heavy-set men who looked like beat-cops, and accosted Abusisi taking him away.  The abductee was going to follow them in bare feet, but knowing they planned to remove him from the train, they told him to put on his shoes.  Later, a third individual returned to the car and began rifling through Aubisi’s belongings.  Makarenko, thinking he might be a thief, demanded to see his ID.  Makarenko says that he got a good look both at the man and his ID and says that he was an officer of the Ukrainian SBU (successor to the KGB), or equivalent of the FBI:

“He wore a short leather flight-jacket.  He was a thin man with sunken cheeks. Hair color light brown, maybe a little red…about 40 years old. If I was shown a photo, I might be able to recognize him.

…I asked him to show me his ID. He took a card and showed it to me for five to seven seconds.  The only thing I remembered was that it was an SBU ID. I even flashed the thought that if he was with the Security Service, then the whole matter was better left alone.

There it stated he was with SBU. I do not remember his job title. I didn’t record and don’t remember the name.  It’s enough for me and what I saw that it was the SBU.”

A representative of the SBU would only comment that the investigation of the incident was a police matter.

A separate Pravda Ukraine article quotes a former SBU officer saying it would very well be possible for the Mossad to pay a lower-ranking SBU official at the oblast (county) level to participate in the abduction.  This individual would have only thought about the money to be earned and not understood the national implications involved in the act.

Makarenko also saw the train conductor who witnessed the abduction and spoke freely about it at first, only to recant what he’d first said upon likely being pressured by authorities.  This railway officer, according to Pravda, has gone on leave for a month and is no longer at his home.

vladimir rokitsky

Deputy SBU chief Vladimir Rokitsky, accused of masterminding Abusisi kidnapping

The article also includes accusations supported by claims of a Ukrainian MP, Anatoly Gritsenko, to the BBC Ukraine service, that the SBU orchestrated the abduction on behalf of the Israeli Mossad:

“According to what I know unofficially, but that has yet to be confirmed, counter-intelligence services of the SBU have been involved in rendering this man to the Israeli side.”

A confidential Ukrainian source involved in politics told an Abusisi family member that the deputy head of the intelligence agency, Vladimir Rokitsky, personally organized the abduction and rendition.  This publication of his name here is the first time a specific Ukrainian official has been implicated in this incident.  If any readers can identify a photo of him I’d like to honor him here accordingly.

The Pravda story also is the first MSM mention of the Jordanian connection to this story, which I reported a few weeks ago.  Jordanian intelligence detained Abusisi during an airport layover and refused to allow him to board his flight to the Ukraine for seven days.  During this time, I maintain Israel was organizing the subsequent abduction of Abusisi that would take place on the train outside Poltava.  Or else it was bargaining with the Jordanians in the hope that they would transfer him directly to Israel.

The Jordanian newspaper Assabil (Arabic) queried a Jordanian government spokesperson, who asked the paper not to report it prematurely and to wait for an official government response.  Unsurprisingly, one was not forthcoming.

The Pravda article closes with an ironic quotation from the mission statement of the SBU:

The statement lists among the SBU’s responsibilities “counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism activities, as well as countering other activities of special services of foreign states.”

I didn’t notice among its responsibilities serving the interests of foreign intelligence agencies within Ukraine’s borders.  If this article isn’t a smoking gun, I don’t know what is.

I don’t know who keeps spinning these fictions concerning Abusisi’s alleged intelligence value to Shabak.  The latest is that he spilled the beans on the Hamas weapons routes that bring Iranian weapons to Gaza via Sudan.  This, according to the claim, allowed IAF drones to attack a weapons convoy there and kill, supposedly, the Hamas arms dealer who’d assumed the former role of Mahmoud al-Mabouh.  Except that it’s not true.  An Israeli source tells me of a briefing by a senior IDF commander, who told him that the target of the attack was a SUDANESE arms dealer instrumental in such shipments.

The claim that Abusisi, who’s been away from Gaza for over two months and in custody for seven weeks or more, would have any information about an arms convoy traveling through Sudan last week is beyond ludicrous.

The fact that Abusisi is accused of enabling every major Israeli intelligence achievement related to Gaza signals two things: Shabak and Mossad are using him as a cover for whatever intelligence assets they do have; and Israelis treat Palestinians as if they are the bogeyman, guilty of every possible sin against Jews and the Jewish state.  They’ve turned Abusisi into a Palestinian monster, a Golem, if you will.  He’s no longer a real person, but a cipher onto which to project whatever fear you feel as an Israeli regarding Palestinians.

There will be a demonstration tomorrow outside the Ukrainian foreign ministry in which Abusisi’s wife, Veronika will participate.

Bufferfacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedintumblrmailfacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedintumblrmail
youtubeyoutube

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Job April 12, 2011, 1:58 PM

    Given that the information is correct, and it does seem reliable, I think Abu Sisi’s detainment can be considered legal. While the validity of the charges against him can be disputed, he was arrested by an official security service (SBU), presumably after Israeli authorities presented their Ukrainian counterparts with the evidance in the case. He was then handed over to the authorities that sought him, I would imagine after an official request. As I see it, putting aside the secrecy which goes along with the accusations in the case, it would have been a similar procedure if we were dealing with a money launderer or a common thief.

    Now I agree that secrecy isn’t humane, but I don’t think you could expect intelligence agencies to wash their dirty laundry in public. Israel considers this man a terrorist (whether rightly or not isn’t relevant to my point), as such it had to take precautions. The fact is that his family did know eventually where he was kept (although not soon enough) and that he has access to legal representation.

    • Richard Silverstein April 12, 2011, 8:39 PM

      What utter nonsense. If this was done legally both government’s would be saying precisely that. The fact that Ukraine claims to know nothing & Israel says nothing as well about this aspect of this sordid mess of a case shows they’re both in it up to their eyeballs. No Israeli official has said that it presented any papers or went through any formal procedure. Your maundering hasbara is pathetic & persuades no one. Perhaps not even yrself.

      Israel considers this man a terrorist (whether rightly or not isn’t relevant to my point)

      Of course it’s not relevant to yr point because yr point is defending Mossad come what may. He had no access to legal representation during his interrogations & torture sessions. Perhaps you’d like a taste of that yrself to see how much access you’d be given to yr attorney while tied to a chair & beaten to a pulp?

      • fuster April 26, 2011, 1:08 PM

        asking people if they would like to be tied to a chair and beaten to a pulp?????

        Richard, what ARE you thinking?

        two governments agree to work together to arrest a man, often there’s a reason.

        if the man was arrested wrongfully, that’s still not grounds for you to abuse somebody thinking that there probably was cause and that the man might have committed a crime or two.

        ease up on folks politely raising questions or offering opinions that differ with your not necessarily well-founded opinions.

        governments often do things that they do not publicized and
        have quite various reasons for not publicizing.

  • dickerson3870 April 12, 2011, 3:22 PM

    RE: “Pravda Identifies New Witness in Abusisi Kidnapping, Charges Senior Ukrainian Intelligence Official With Orchestrating Scheme” – R.S.

    “OLDE SNARKY” SEZ: Wow! I’m glad things like that don’t ever happen here in the good, old US of A. At least, not often.

  • conf April 12, 2011, 3:51 PM